sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 25th 09, 03:53 PM posted to alt.usenet.kooks,sci.geo.meteorology,alt.idiots,alt.talk.creationism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Default Scientific data does not agree with the 'consensus'. Sorry greenie weenies, but no cigar!!!

On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:11:48 -0800 (PST), Ed
wrote:

On Jan 24, 11:13*pm, wrote:
§tarkiller© wrote:
Lie #1: AGW is a scientific fact
Care to cite it them?


Go back to school and get an education. Then you'll be in with a
chance.




Some Republican faithful say that If it's not on Limbaugh's website,
it just isn't true so it can't be happening. They're still looking
for cites proving evidence that the earth isn't flat and the Theory of
Evolution. Gravity is also a theory, thus many right wingers don't
believe it to be true.


Funny how all you dolts ever come back with is rhetoric and ad hominem
attacks.
Seems if you knew your ass from a hole in a ground you'd be happy to
provide all the great scientific evidence you claim to have.
Instead you continue to come back with no cites, no formulas, nothing
but more rhetoric.
Gravity does have constants and laws. such as terminal velocity and
such. But so far none of you have presented anything proving man made
GW other than "the consensus says".
Get back to us when you have something other than name calling and
stupid assed comments.




So far it is still only a theory.


...just like the "Theory of Gravity". Do you deny that one as well?

Hell you dolts can't even produce a simple formula backing up your
silly assed claims.


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Here's a simple formula for you:
Where Dk represents the sum total of Denialist knowledge:

Dk=0

Simple enough for you?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!


  #2   Report Post  
Old January 25th 09, 05:05 PM posted to alt.usenet.kooks,sci.geo.meteorology,alt.idiots,alt.talk.creationism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Sep 2006
Posts: 7
Default Scientific data does not agree with the 'consensus'. Sorry greenie weenies, but no cigar!!!


"§tarkiller©" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:11:48 -0800 (PST), Ed
wrote:

But so far none of you have presented anything proving man made
GW other than "the consensus says".


Hey moron, go to google scholar and look at all the cites for yourself.
Google James Hansen and read about how the Bush administration, people with
no credentials, altered his testimony to Congress in an all-out war on
science.
****wit.


  #3   Report Post  
Old January 25th 09, 05:26 PM posted to alt.usenet.kooks,sci.geo.meteorology,alt.idiots,alt.talk.creationism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Sep 2006
Posts: 7
Default Scientific data does not agree with the 'consensus'. Sorry greenie weenies, but no cigar!!!


"§tarkiller©" wrote in message
...

And before you whine about ad hom attacks I'll preempt with an explanation
of why people like you are ****wits. First of all, you listen to that venom
that spews out of bull**** "news" channels that are really just vulgar (ss)
entertainment based on validating stupid people's opinions.* Why anyone
would pay any attention to a Rush Limbaugh or that idiot O'Reilly is beyond
me. They have nothing positive to offer the public debate; they are
incapable of offering anything constructive, they merely deny and attack.
Worse, people like you, *laypeople* routinely question science you don't
****ing begin to understand. I deal with this all the time with evolution. I
have a post-graduate level education in biology and I have to listen to
Rush-watching mouthbreathers who can't even define evolution without ****ing
it up tell me I'm wrong about a subject I've made my life's work.
Here's a new concept - if you don't know **** about a subject, shut the ****
up about it. If you just have to scratch that itch, as it were, watch
football and second guess the coaches. If you can't even tell the difference
between climate and weather, shut the **** up about climate change. If you
don't know what the mechanisms of allele change are, shut the **** up about
evolution. If you don't know what a credit default swap is, shut the **** up
about economics.
People who don't know something are ignorant. I'm ignorant as all **** about
economics. But people who pontificate their opinions about such subjects are
stupid.
Get it?




*I include all corporate news, not just Fox. Corporate news is killing
America. They merely endeavor to sell advertising space, and in that
endeavor they shape the form of the public debate.


  #4   Report Post  
Old January 25th 09, 10:47 PM posted to alt.usenet.kooks,sci.geo.meteorology,alt.idiots,alt.talk.creationism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2009
Posts: 4
Default Scientific data does not agree with the 'consensus'. Sorry greenieweenies, but no cigar!!!

TimK wrote:
"§tarkiller©" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:11:48 -0800 (PST), Ed
wrote:

But so far none of you have presented anything proving man made
GW other than "the consensus says".


Hey moron, go to google scholar and look at all the cites for yourself.
Google James Hansen and read about how the Bush administration, people with
no credentials, altered his testimony to Congress in an all-out war on
science.
****wit.

Ive found its a zero-sum game to try and educate the flat-earthers in
the GW deniers camp.

^_^



--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\__\ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \
/:/ _/_ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /::\ \ _____\:\ \ ___ \:\ \ ___ /::\ \
/:/_/:/\:\__\ /::::::::\__\ /\ \ \:\__\ /\ /:/\:\__\
\:\/:/ /:/ / \:\~~\~~\/__/ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\/:/ \/__/
\::/ /:/ / \:\ \ \:\ /:/ / \::/__/
\/_/:/ / \:\ \ \:\/:/ / \:\ \
/:/ / \:\__\ \::/ / \:\__\
\/__/ \/__/ \/__/ \/__/
http://www.bds-palestine.net/
http://shoebush.org/
+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+
|S|a|y| |D|u|h| |t|o| |A|y|n| |R|a|n|d|
+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+

  #7   Report Post  
Old January 26th 09, 03:40 PM posted to alt.usenet.kooks,sci.geo.meteorology,alt.idiots,alt.talk.creationism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2009
Posts: 3
Default Scientific data does not agree with the 'consensus'. Sorry greenie weenies, but no cigar!!!

Kali pinched out a steaming pile
:

In article ,
says...
TimK wrote:
"§tarkiller©" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:11:48 -0800 (PST), Ed


wrote:

But so far none of you have presented anything proving man made
GW other than "the consensus says".

Hey moron, go to google scholar and look at all the cites for

yourself.
Google James Hansen and read about how the Bush administration,

people with
no credentials, altered his testimony to Congress in an all-out

war on
science.
****wit.

Ive found its a zero-sum game to try and educate the flat-earthers

in
the GW deniers camp.

^_^

Same here, but fortunately, with science given the respect it
deserves over the next (at least) eight years, there will be less
and less flat earthers In the future.


In terms of legislation and government perhaps.
But most of the public gets their memes from the likes of Limbaugh et
al...
So the masses will remain willfully, gleefully ignorant and proud of
it.

^_^

--
http://www.bds-palestine.net/?q=node/9
___ ___ ___ ___
/\__\ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \
/:/ _/_ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /::\ \ _____\:\ \ ___ \:\ \ ___ /::\ \
/:/_/:/\:\__\ /::::::::\__\ /\ \ \:\__\ /\ /:/\:\__\
\:\/:/ /:/ / \:\~~\~~\/__/ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\/:/ \/__/
\::/ /:/ / \:\ \ \:\ /:/ / \::/__/
\/_/:/ / \:\ \ \:\/:/ / \:\ \
/:/ / \:\__\ \::/ / \:\__\
  #8   Report Post  
Old January 26th 09, 06:42 PM posted to alt.usenet.kooks,sci.geo.meteorology,alt.idiots,alt.talk.creationism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2009
Posts: 3
Default Scientific data does not agree with the 'consensus'. Sorry greenie weenies, but no cigar!!!

In article ,
says...
Kali pinched out a steaming pile
:

In article ,
says...
TimK wrote:
"§tarkiller©" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:11:48 -0800 (PST), Ed


wrote:

But so far none of you have presented anything proving man made
GW other than "the consensus says".

Hey moron, go to google scholar and look at all the cites for

yourself.
Google James Hansen and read about how the Bush administration,

people with
no credentials, altered his testimony to Congress in an all-out

war on
science.
****wit.

Ive found its a zero-sum game to try and educate the flat-earthers

in
the GW deniers camp.

^_^

Same here, but fortunately, with science given the respect it
deserves over the next (at least) eight years, there will be less
and less flat earthers In the future.


In terms of legislation and government perhaps.


That's a big step in the right direction. Also there will be a
demand for science and engineering educated individuals in a
multitude of projects for green energy and infrastructure.

But most of the public gets their memes from the likes of Limbaugh et
al...


It seems like a lot, but consider Obama's 77% approval rating now. I
think the percentage of true hold-out knuckledraggers in our country
is about 20%. The problem is that they have louder voices sometimes.

So the masses will remain willfully, gleefully ignorant and proud of
it.


Your skepticism is healthy, but I hope it's proven unwarranted over
the coming years. ... er... but watch out for that 20% that will
never be on board for progress.

^_^

--
Kali
  #9   Report Post  
Old January 26th 09, 10:43 PM posted to alt.usenet.kooks,sci.geo.meteorology,alt.idiots,alt.talk.creationism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2009
Posts: 3
Default Scientific data does not agree with the 'consensus'. Sorry greenie weenies, but no cigar!!!

Kali pinched out a steaming pile
:

In article ,
says...
Kali pinched out a steaming pile
:

In article ,
says...
TimK wrote:
"§tarkiller©" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:11:48 -0800 (PST), Ed


wrote:

But so far none of you have presented anything proving man

made
GW other than "the consensus says".

Hey moron, go to google scholar and look at all the cites for

yourself.
Google James Hansen and read about how the Bush administration,

people with
no credentials, altered his testimony to Congress in an all-out

war on
science.
****wit.

Ive found its a zero-sum game to try and educate the flat-

earthers
in
the GW deniers camp.

^_^

Same here, but fortunately, with science given the respect it
deserves over the next (at least) eight years, there will be less
and less flat earthers In the future.


In terms of legislation and government perhaps.


That's a big step in the right direction. Also there will be a
demand for science and engineering educated individuals in a
multitude of projects for green energy and infrastructure.

Sounds like a increase in H1-B visas is neccessary then


But most of the public gets their memes from the likes of Limbaugh

et
al...


It seems like a lot, but consider Obama's 77% approval rating now. I
think the percentage of true hold-out knuckledraggers in our country
is about 20%. The problem is that they have louder voices sometimes.

Because I saw this a few minutes ago...it seems appropo:
http://www.alternet.org/rights/12249...isual_aid%22_f
or_white_supremacist_recruiting/?page=entire

So the masses will remain willfully, gleefully ignorant and proud of
it.


Your skepticism is healthy, but I hope it's proven unwarranted over
the coming years. ... er... but watch out for that 20% that will
never be on board for progress.

Racism is alive and well. And with economic downturns people look for
scapegoats.
FYI


--
http://www.bds-palestine.net/?q=node/9
___ ___ ___ ___
/\__\ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \
/:/ _/_ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /::\ \ _____\:\ \ ___ \:\ \ ___ /::\ \
/:/_/:/\:\__\ /::::::::\__\ /\ \ \:\__\ /\ /:/\:\__\
\:\/:/ /:/ / \:\~~\~~\/__/ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\/:/ \/__/
\::/ /:/ / \:\ \ \:\ /:/ / \::/__/
\/_/:/ / \:\ \ \:\/:/ / \:\ \
/:/ / \:\__\ \::/ / \:\__\
  #10   Report Post  
Old January 26th 09, 10:44 PM posted to alt.usenet.kooks,sci.geo.meteorology,alt.idiots,alt.talk.creationism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2009
Posts: 3
Default Scientific data does not agree with the 'consensus'. Sorry greenie weenies, but no cigar!!!

Bob Officer pinched out a steaming pile
:

On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:40:08 -0600, in alt.usenet.kooks, §ñühw¤£f
wrote:

Kali pinched out a steaming pile
:

In article ,
says...
TimK wrote:
"§tarkiller©" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:11:48 -0800 (PST), Ed


wrote:

But so far none of you have presented anything proving man made
GW other than "the consensus says".

Hey moron, go to google scholar and look at all the cites for

yourself.
Google James Hansen and read about how the Bush administration,

people with
no credentials, altered his testimony to Congress in an all-out

war on
science.
****wit.

Ive found its a zero-sum game to try and educate the flat-earthers

in
the GW deniers camp.

^_^

Same here, but fortunately, with science given the respect it
deserves over the next (at least) eight years, there will be less
and less flat earthers In the future.


In terms of legislation and government perhaps.
But most of the public gets their memes from the likes of Limbaugh et
al...
So the masses will remain willfully, gleefully ignorant and proud of
it.

^_^


The radio station should be required to sound a little chime each and
every time Rush uses a fallacy during a broadcast. You know, **All
right thinking people** say so.

All that dinging would be maddening...


--
http://www.bds-palestine.net/?q=node/9
___ ___ ___ ___
/\__\ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \
/:/ _/_ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /::\ \ _____\:\ \ ___ \:\ \ ___ /::\ \
/:/_/:/\:\__\ /::::::::\__\ /\ \ \:\__\ /\ /:/\:\__\
\:\/:/ /:/ / \:\~~\~~\/__/ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\/:/ \/__/
\::/ /:/ / \:\ \ \:\ /:/ / \::/__/
\/_/:/ / \:\ \ \:\/:/ / \:\ \
/:/ / \:\__\ \::/ / \:\__\


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Not a 97% consensus, but a 99.9% consensus Dawlish uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 18 June 19th 15 11:07 PM
Greenie Desal Insanity, Just Like All Other Greenie Schemes,Will Cripple Us Martin Brown sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 18 November 13th 10 07:45 AM
Greenie Desal Insanity, Just Like All Other Greenie Schemes,Will Cripple Us Martin Brown sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 1 November 12th 10 04:00 PM
Scientific data does not agree with the 'consensus'. Sorrygreenie weenies, but no cigar!!! Addinall sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 January 31st 09 01:43 AM
A Consensus Does Not Exist And Never Has prk via NatScience.com sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 May 31st 08 06:01 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017