Obama is known a great orator. When speaking ad hoc he cannot speak any
better that you or I. The most important force behind a great orator is his
speech writer. Obama got elected because he has a speech writer who appealed
to the great unwashed liberal media and the ignorant masses. Now Obama's
speech writer has gone too far. Obama's speech writer claimed that the US
federal government could save the world economy by a crash program of
building windmills. If Obama wishes to survive his first four weeks in
office he is going to need to mount a purge of his White House staff,
starting with his speech writer. When I speak of Obama surviving his first
four weeks in office I mean the possibility of assassination by a lone gun
man or impeachment by his own party. Obama's four week deadline is coming up
soon. Obama needs to act swiftly.

kiloVolts wrote:

Obama is known a great orator. When speaking ad hoc he cannot speak any
better that you or I. The most important force behind a great orator is his
speech writer. Obama got elected because he has a speech writer who appealed
to the great unwashed liberal media and the ignorant masses. Now Obama's
speech writer has gone too far. Obama's speech writer claimed that the US
federal government could save the world economy by a crash program of
building windmills.
[snip]

Obama has no education in math or science. When he sees nameplate
capacity he believes it. He does not see thermodynamics, physics, or
real world subsidiary couplings.

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/wind.htm

The real world truth is that wind generation installations are mostly
government subsidy farms. They are not gigawatt-class generation
facilties, they are noisome in so many ways, they slaughter birds and
bats, and nobody knows what sucking hundreds then thousands of
gigawatts out of the wind will do to the planet.

Earth's rotation and weather are both coupled to the wind. Uncle Al
loves a good experiment.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

Uncle Al wrote:

Earth's rotation and weather are both coupled to the wind. Uncle Al
loves a good experiment.

Unfortunately you have only the same historical data
to measure against as the global warming fools.

On Feb 17, 10:51 am, Uncle Al wrote:

The real world truth is that wind generation installations are mostly
government subsidy farms. They are not gigawatt-class generation
facilties, they are noisome in so many ways, they slaughter birds and
bats, and nobody knows what sucking hundreds then thousands of
gigawatts out of the wind will do to the planet.

Earth's rotation and weather are both coupled to the wind. Uncle Al
loves a good experiment.

Yeah, I love a good experiment too! And given the historical record of
setting off the H-bomb in spite of unknown dangers of setting the
atmosphere on fire, or LHC sucking the whole region of space into a
black hole, It's pretty clear that the hubris and curiosity of mankind
will drive this experiment forward as well. So the only question that
remains for all of us is: DO YOU FEEL LUCKY? Well, do ya, Punk?

It boggles the mind that charlatans are STILL denying climate change in
spite of the overwhelming scientific evidence for it. With this
head-in-the-sand crowd, it's clearly nothing more than yet another
indefensible POLITICAL stance.


"sanforized" wrote in message
...
Uncle Al wrote:

Earth's rotation and weather are both coupled to the wind. Uncle Al
loves a good experiment.

Unfortunately you have only the same historical data
to measure against as the global warming fools.

On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:35:10 -0800, "kiloVolts"
mantrap@0j6s0s7A6s1e2Z3V4rG4h1b7q7a8s0aX7O2D9y6j1 .com wrote:

Obama's speech writer claimed that the US
federal government could save the world economy by a crash program of
building windmills.

When and where?

On Feb 18, 12:17 am, "Ric Brown" wrote:

It boggles the mind that charlatans are STILL denying climate change in
spite of the overwhelming scientific evidence for it. With this
head-in-the-sand crowd, it's clearly nothing more than yet another
indefensible POLITICAL stance.

----------

Political Propaganda 101.

If you are charlatan, your first defense when it's pointed out is to
call your opposition "charlatans". Nobody will check to see if you are
lying.

If your evidence is wrong, non-existent, or heavily "spun", term it
"overwhelming scientific evidence" even though it's diametrically
opposed to any real "science". Nobody will be able to check to see if
you are lying except real scientists and if they say anything you can
cut their funding and fire them.

Cleverly shift the issue from real issues (does man made CO2 cause
global warming?...No, it does not. It's impossible for it to have any
significant effect) to a non-issue where you can say you were "right"
all along: climate change. (Climate has been cyclically changing since
the beginning of the earth so obviously if called on your lies, you
can point to this and say you were "right" all along!)

If people take enough of an active interest in what you are saying to
start to point out the lies in it, turn that upside down and claim
they have their "head in the sand". Of course that is EXACTLY where
you want them to be!

Finally, When YOUR position is nothing but made-up propaganda for
political purposes (all propaganda is for political purposes!)
cleverly turn it around and say that your opposition is arguing based
on a "POLITICAL stance"! Hey, if "carbon taxes and credits" designed
to redistribute wealth isn't political what in hell is?

The bottom line, "Ric" is that nothing you say is at all true (except
the part about climate change being "real") and like any good
criminal, when you are caught in the middle of a crime you loudly say
it was the VICTIMS and not you who were perpetrating the crimes! Good
job.

-----