Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...eedback_1.html

"Professor Andrew Dessler, the author of this
study, which is published in the journal
Science, concludes that evidence of this
strong, positive water vapor feedback is
overwhelming."

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

David wrote:
Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...eedback_1.html

"Professor Andrew Dessler, the author of this
study, which is published in the journal
Science, concludes that evidence of this
strong, positive water vapor feedback is
overwhelming."

Is there a proven correlation between humidity and cloud cover?

Do humid regions necessarily have hotter climates?

David wrote:
Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...eedback_1.html

"Professor Andrew Dessler, the author of this
study, which is published in the journal
Science, concludes that evidence of this
strong, positive water vapor feedback is
overwhelming."

David Christainsen - Meteorologist


“It’s a vicious cycle – warmer temperatures mean higher humidity, which
in turn leads to even more warming,” Dessler explains.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0219152132.htm

So, according to Dessler:

Warmer - increased humidity - warmer - increased humidity - until
what? The globe spontaneously combusting?

David wrote:
Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...eedback_1.html

"Professor Andrew Dessler, the author of this
study, which is published in the journal
Science, concludes that evidence of this
strong, positive water vapor feedback is
overwhelming."

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

I love these types of couched statements:

"Everything shows that the climate models are probably getting the water
vapor feedback right..."

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0219152132.htm

If everything shows it, then why 'probably'?

For a true scientist, such terminology is pure nonsense.

On Feb 24, 4:31*pm, Peter Franks wrote:
David wrote:
Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...por_feedback_1....

"Professor Andrew Dessler, the author of this
study, which is published in the journal
Science, concludes that evidence of this
strong, positive water vapor feedback is
overwhelming."

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

I love these types of couched statements:

"Everything shows that the climate models are probably getting the water
vapor feedback right..."

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0219152132.htm

If everything shows it, then why 'probably'?

For a true scientist, such terminology is pure nonsense.

Exactly right - why on earth do you think I posted it?

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

Dave wrote:
On Feb 24, 4:31 pm, Peter Franks wrote:
David wrote:
Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...por_feedback_1....
"Professor Andrew Dessler, the author of this
study, which is published in the journal
Science, concludes that evidence of this
strong, positive water vapor feedback is
overwhelming."
David Christainsen - Meteorologist
I love these types of couched statements:

"Everything shows that the climate models are probably getting the water
vapor feedback right..."

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0219152132.htm

If everything shows it, then why 'probably'?

For a true scientist, such terminology is pure nonsense.

Exactly right - why on earth do you think I posted it?

I have no idea why you posted -- do you expect me to divine your reasoning?

"David" wrote in message
...
Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...eedback_1.html

"Professor Andrew Dessler, the author of this
study, which is published in the journal
Science, concludes that evidence of this
strong, positive water vapor feedback is
overwhelming."


**LOL! That'll be great. The inhabitants of the Sahara, the Atacma and a
goodly chunk of the Australian outback will be very pleased to hear that
they can expect rain very soon.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au