Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...vidence_1.html

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

On Feb 26, 9:07*am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_new_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions. So "this data" really isn't data. It's the opinions of
agenda driven pretend-scientists.

If your livelihood depended upon pretending to see an emergency you
would pretend to see it also.

Claudius Denk wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:07 am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_new_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions.

k00k-a-d00dle-d000!

On Feb 26, 2:12*pm, "marcodbeast" wrote:
Claudius Denk wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:07 am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_new_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions.

k00k-a-d00dle-d000!

This is a perfect example of why serious
meteorologists will try a moderated forum.

I already have tried this and they removed
me from membership for talking up Dr.
Svensmark.

OTOH the juvenility of unmoderated USENET
is a real turn-off.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

On 2/26/09 2:12 PM, in article , "marcodbeast"
wrote:

Claudius Denk wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:07 am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_ne
w_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

** I registered to that site last week and
found precious few facts and nothing that
made sense.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions.

k00k-a-d00dle-d000!
** So says the crazy beastie rooster

Dave wrote:
On Feb 26, 2:12 pm, "marcodbeast" wrote:
Claudius Denk wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:07 am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_new_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions.

k00k-a-d00dle-d000!

This is a perfect example of why serious
meteorologists will try a moderated forum.

I already have tried this and they removed
me from membership for talking up Dr.
Svensmark.

OTOH the juvenility of unmoderated USENET
is a real turn-off.

I agree - it's not often you hear someone deny the existence of entire
satellites. =)

On Feb 26, 12:07*pm, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_new_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

Thanks for the post, David.

On 2/26/09 12:07 PM, in article
, "David"
wrote:

Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...new_evidence_1.
html

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.


** From David Christainsen - Meteorologist
Nothing is "good data" nothing is factual.

Claudius Denk wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:07 am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_new_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions. So "this data" really isn't data. It's the opinions of
agenda driven pretend-scientists.

Lie 1


If your livelihood depended upon pretending to see an emergency you
would pretend to see it also.

Lie 2

Please get factual information at your local library rather than at the
local pub next to the gas station.

Q

--
CO2 at 390 ppm and counting, put a tiger in your tank -- ESSO commercial

On 2/26/09 8:25 PM, in article ,
"\frac{1}{R}\sqrt{\frac{L}{C}}" wrote:

Claudius Denk wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:07 am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_ne
w_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions. So "this data" really isn't data. It's the opinions of
agenda driven pretend-scientists.

Lie 1

** Proof please

If your livelihood depended upon pretending to see an emergency you
would pretend to see it also.

Lie 2

** PROOF PLEASE