Accuweather
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...vidence_1.html

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

On Feb 26, 9:07*am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_new_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions. So "this data" really isn't data. It's the opinions of
agenda driven pretend-scientists.

If your livelihood depended upon pretending to see an emergency you
would pretend to see it also.

Claudius Denk wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:07 am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_new_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions.

k00k-a-d00dle-d000!

On Feb 26, 2:12*pm, "marcodbeast" wrote:
Claudius Denk wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:07 am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_new_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions.

k00k-a-d00dle-d000!

This is a perfect example of why serious
meteorologists will try a moderated forum.

I already have tried this and they removed
me from membership for talking up Dr.
Svensmark.

OTOH the juvenility of unmoderated USENET
is a real turn-off.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

Dave wrote:
On Feb 26, 2:12 pm, "marcodbeast" wrote:
Claudius Denk wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:07 am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_new_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions.

k00k-a-d00dle-d000!

This is a perfect example of why serious
meteorologists will try a moderated forum.

I already have tried this and they removed
me from membership for talking up Dr.
Svensmark.

OTOH the juvenility of unmoderated USENET
is a real turn-off.

I agree - it's not often you hear someone deny the existence of entire
satellites. =)

On 2/26/09 2:12 PM, in article , "marcodbeast"
wrote:

Claudius Denk wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:07 am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_ne
w_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

** I registered to that site last week and
found precious few facts and nothing that
made sense.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions.

k00k-a-d00dle-d000!
** So says the crazy beastie rooster

Claudius Denk wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:07 am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_new_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions. So "this data" really isn't data. It's the opinions of
agenda driven pretend-scientists.

Lie 1


If your livelihood depended upon pretending to see an emergency you
would pretend to see it also.

Lie 2

Please get factual information at your local library rather than at the
local pub next to the gas station.

Q

--
CO2 at 390 ppm and counting, put a tiger in your tank -- ESSO commercial

On 2/26/09 8:25 PM, in article ,
"\frac{1}{R}\sqrt{\frac{L}{C}}" wrote:

Claudius Denk wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:07 am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_ne
w_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions. So "this data" really isn't data. It's the opinions of
agenda driven pretend-scientists.

Lie 1

** Proof please

If your livelihood depended upon pretending to see an emergency you
would pretend to see it also.

Lie 2

** PROOF PLEASE

wrote:


On 2/26/09 8:25 PM, in article ,
"\frac{1}{R}\sqrt{\frac{L}{C}}" wrote:

Claudius Denk wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:07 am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_ne
w_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist
We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions. So "this data" really isn't data. It's the opinions of
agenda driven pretend-scientists.
Lie 1

** Proof please

Look at the GRACE data.

If your livelihood depended upon pretending to see an emergency you
would pretend to see it also.
Lie 2

** PROOF PLEASE


www.ipcc.ch


--
CO2 at 390 ppm and counting, put a tiger in your tank -- ESSO commercial

On 2/27/09 3:27 PM, in article ,
"\frac{1}{R}\sqrt{\frac{L}{C}}" wrote:

wrote:


On 2/26/09 8:25 PM, in article ,
"\frac{1}{R}\sqrt{\frac{L}{C}}" wrote:

Claudius Denk wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:07 am, David wrote:
Accuweatherhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2009/02/research_reveals_
ne
w_ev...

"New research from the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY) shows new evidence
of the impacts of global warming in the
polar regions."

I consider this good data; let's put it
into perspective for the big picture.

David Christainsen - Meteorologist
We have no way of *objectively* measuring melting at the polar
regions. So "this data" really isn't data. It's the opinions of
agenda driven pretend-scientists.
Lie 1

** Proof please

Look at the GRACE data.

** That is not providing proof, and what I see from my second request you
cited a fraudulent document every page of which has been debunked multiple
times and its writers and editors have had no replies. Nor has anything
written been peer reviewed.

If your livelihood depended upon pretending to see an emergency you
would pretend to see it also.
Lie 2

** PROOF PLEASE

www.ipcc.ch