Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Look how quickly yesterday's alarmism becomes today's comic relief:
$9 trillion the cost of global warming: Stern Report The World Today - Monday, 30 October , 2006 12:24:00 Reporter: Sarah Clarke ELEANOR HALL: The most comprehensive review ever carried out on the financial cost of global warming has found that climate change could not only devastate the environment and cause mass migration but could cut the world's annual economic growth by 20 per cent. The report by UK economist, Sir Nicholas Stern, and commissioned by the British Government is to be released in London tonight. It calculates that the total global cost of climate change could run to $9 trillion and it warns there is only a small window of 10 to 15 years to address the problem, as Environment Reporter Sarah Clarke reports. SARAH CLARKE: The review was commissioned by the British Government in July last year. Today, the author and former chief economist of the World Bank, Sir Nicholas Stern, is expected to warn the world has underestimated the cost of climate change, and a failure to address it could slash global economic growth by up to 20 per cent. Nick Rowley was part of the team that initiated the review and was a senior adviser on climate change to British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, at the time. NICK ROWLEY: One of the key things that Tony Blair wanted to achieve through his G8 presidency when he made climate change one of his two priorities was to make it absolutely clear that yes climate change is an environmental problem but it is not solely an environmental issue. Really what we learn from the work that Sir Nicholas Stern has done is that the world does not need to choose between averting climate change and promoting growth and development. Indeed the world can do both and indeed must do both if it's going to achieve growth and development because there are going to be significant impacts if we don't move very quickly in the next 10 years to seriously tackling climate change. SARAH CLARKE: Professor Michael Grubb is the head of the global Carbon Trust. He's been briefed on the review's findings and says it will turn economic argument about global warming on its head. MICHAEL GRUBB: It's as though we've been kind of sleep walking. With a lot of powerful players sort of hoping this wasn't a real problem or hoping it would go away. And the report is simply saying, you know, that is just not tenable and the longer those kind of fantasies are maintained the more costly and damaging this problem will be. SARAH CLARKE: The 700 page report does give a financial solution and builds a case for global action. It's expected to support a global carbon-trading scheme and increased regulation of carbon emitting products. It also gives a window of 10 to 15 years for countries to act. After that, it warns it could be too late. Professor Michael Grubb again. MICHAEL GRUBB: Well I think obviously every country has to work out what this analysis implies for itself. But I think the most central message, I mean, other than the general Australian context and concern about impacts here, is that the world community is going to be accelerating its efforts to get to grips with this. It is looking for major industrialised countries to play their part. The Kyoto system is there, global trading markets are emerging, there's a lot of international investment going through the Kyoto system. Personally I would question whether it makes sense for Australia to continue to shut itself out of that. SARAH CLARKE: Australia and the United States have both refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol on the grounds that ratifying would hurt the economy. Green groups will be hoping that this economic report card may be enough to convince both countries to come around. ELEANOR HALL: Environment reporter Sarah Clarke. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Obama climate plan could cost $2 trillion | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Day q??*10^3 - The Sun Hibernates - Global markets lost $ 50 trillion | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
REPOST - Joint USAF/NOAA Report of Solar and Geophysical Activity 19 Feb 2009 | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
REPOST - Joint USAF/NOAA Report of Solar and Geophysical Activity 19 Feb 2009 | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Global Warming's $Trillion goals | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |