Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.
For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records
from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2

The global data given above are graphed he

http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The regression statistics for the line in the graph above
are below.

Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(|t|)
(Intercept) -25.45009 2.14696 -11.8 2e-16
YEARMON 0.01280 0.00108 11.9 1.0210e-27
---

Residual standard error: 0.179 on 361 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-Squared: 0.281, Adjusted R-squared: 0.279
F-statistic: 141 on 1 and 361 DF, p-value: 1.0210e-27

On 3/10/09 1:03 PM, in article
, "Roger
Coppock" wrote:

Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.

** BULL**** DATA

On Mar 10, 1:42*pm, "
wrote:
On 3/10/09 1:03 PM, in article
, "Roger

Coppock" wrote:
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.

** BULL**** DATA

So, you deny the data,
but do not provide any data of your own.

On Mar 11, 3:19*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Mar 10, 1:42*pm, "
wrote:

On 3/10/09 1:03 PM, in article
, "Roger

Coppock" wrote:
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.

** BULL**** DATA

So, you deny the data,
but do not provide any data of your own.

** Roger: you provide data that does in no way
prove your statement and further your source
is unreliable

On Mar 11, 3:43*pm, "
wrote:
On Mar 11, 3:19*am, Roger Coppock wrote
On Mar 10, 1:42*pm, "
wrote:

On 3/10/09 1:03 PM, in article
, "Roger

Coppock" wrote:
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.

** BULL**** DATA

So, you deny the data,
but do not provide any data of your own.

** Roger: you provide data that does in no way
* * *prove your statement

Oh, then you need to learn to read a graph.

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.
For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records
from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2

The global data given above are graphed he

http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The regression statistics for the line in the graph above
are below.

Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(|t|)
(Intercept) -25.45009 2.14696 -11.8 2e-16
YEARMON 0.01280 0.00108 11.9 1.0210e-27
---

Residual standard error: 0.179 on 361 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-Squared: 0.281, Adjusted R-squared: 0.279
F-statistic: 141 on 1 and 361 DF, p-value: 1.0210e-27


-------------------

and further your source*is unreliable

Oh! These are Spencer and Christy data,
both are global warming deniers who
frequent coal lobby functions.

On Mar 11, 7:40*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Mar 11, 3:43*pm, "
wrote:



On Mar 11, 3:19*am, Roger Coppock wrote
On Mar 10, 1:42*pm, "
wrote:

On 3/10/09 1:03 PM, in article
, "Roger

Coppock" wrote:
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.

** BULL**** DATA

So, you deny the data,
but do not provide any data of your own.

** Roger: you provide data that does in no way
* * *prove your statement

Oh, then you need to learn to read a graph.

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
.. [tard turds flushed]

Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and
they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build
a structure which has no relation to reality.
Nikola Tesla, Modern Mechanics and Inventions, July, 1934

The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be
sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.
Nikola Tesla, Modern Mechanics and Inventions. July, 1934