Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 15, 3:56 pm, "oobnz" wrote:
Save the planet! Don't breed! Correction: [breed less] March 15 2009 A new paper by Oregon State University scientists, lucky to still find enough peers to review: Here we estimate the extra emissions of fossil carbon dioxide that an average individual causes when he or she chooses to have children. The summed emissions of a person's descendants, weighted by their relatedness to him, may far exceed the lifetime emissions produced by the original parent. Under current conditions in the United States, for example, each child adds about 9441 metric tons of carbon dioxide to the carbon legacy of an average female, which is 5.7 times her lifetime emissions. A person's reproductive choices must be considered along with his day-today activities when assessing his ultimate impact on the global environment. Scary, if such scientists ever had, er, now that such scientists actually have influence. Why would that be 'scary'? Fran |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Whackier And Whackier, But Scary Nevertheless | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
GFS scary | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
{O/T} Scary Beast | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Scary looking chart. | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Scary Looking Clouds :-) | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |