Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roger Coppock" wrote in message ... On Apr 6, 8:31 pm, "BobLl" wrote: [ . . . ] However, I'm happy to accept your statistical argument that it cannot be determined whether the global temperature has been warming or cooling for the last 10 years. Make sure to tell the politicians. Well, I'll be! How about the hemisphere disparity? No answers for that one I see. That the Northern Hemisphere would warm faster than the Southern was predicted by Arrhenius in 1896. CO2 has more effect over land than sea, and the Northern Hemisphere has more land than the Southern. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No evidence for global warming over the last ten years = no AGW crisis = no justification for stupid carbon trading schemes or other onerous prosperity killing mandates = good Glad you agree. Then we don't need to get into whether CO2 is a factor. An 1896 cite? LOL So you think just the northern hemisphere will get warmer by 10 degrees this century (or whatever the latest silly AGW line is), not the southern or the tropics? You think there is no mixing of atmosphere or sea between hemispheres and the tropics? |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 6, 11:31*pm, "BobLl" wrote:
However, I'm happy to accept your statistical argument that it cannot be determined whether the global temperature has been warming or cooling for the last 10 years. * Make sure to tell the politicians. like so? "The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) requires the calculation of averages for consecutive periods of 30 years, with the latest covering the 1961-1990 period. However, many WMO members, including the UK, update their averages at the completion of each decade. Thirty years was chosen as a period long enough to eliminate year-to-year variations." http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/averages/ |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 7, 5:05*am, matt_sykes wrote:
But the land in the south isnt warming. In fact much of it is cooling. *So Arrhenius is wrong, and so are you. *AGW is nothing but natural variability and intentionaly fraudulent scinece.- Hide quoted text - ah yes, denialism, the theory that this graph http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg is flat. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 7, 8:20*pm, Catoni wrote:
Yeah, same here. They keep making warming promises, for about thirty years now, but we keep getting cooler weather then usual. Shouldn't it be a little warmer then usual after so many years of "Warming"? "The Arbor Day Foundation has recently completed an extensive updating of U.S. Hardiness Zones based upon data from 5,000 National Climatic Data Center cooperative stations across the continental United States. "This animation illustrates the general warming that has occurred from 1990 to 2006. Click the play button to see how the hardiness zones have changed. " http://www.arborday.org/media/mapchanges.cfm |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Latest UAH Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |