On Apr 14, 5:16 pm, "oonbz" wrote:
"Fran" wrote in message

...
On Apr 14, 11:19 am, "oonbz" wrote:

"Roger Coppock" wrote in message

...

Berkeley -- For those who think of nature as a wild, unspoiled Eden
that preserves the natural flora and fauna free from human
interference, global warming has a nasty surprise in store, according
to University of California, Berkeley, biologist Anthony Barnosky.

0.68ºC plus or minus 0.2ºC warming over 150 years last century is hardly noticeable. let
alone apocalyptic!
A lot of that warming has been negated by global cooling since 1998 anyway.
Let's see some decent warming before we panic and needlesssly investigate such
hypotheticals!!

That makes no sense. You are saying that after we see some "decent
warming" we should panic and needlessly investigate such
hypotheticals.

Why should we ever "panic" or do needless things?
************************************************** ************************

I'll rephrase that ...

Let's see some decent warming before we panic and investigate!!



You still don't get it. Let me spell it out for you.


1. When do you think panic is rational conduct?

2. Are panicking and investigating the same thing?

Fran