On Apr 15, 10:56 am, "oonbz" wrote:
"Fran" wrote in message

...
On Apr 14, 10:42 pm, Fran wrote:





On Apr 14, 10:25 pm, Peter Muehlbauer

wrote:
Fran wrote:
On Apr 14, 1:48 pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Apr 13, 8:02 pm, What A. Fool wrote:
[ . . . ]

Come back when a year is warmer than 1998.

Pseudo scientists, like Mr. Fool, have trouble with the
insufficient data fallacy. However, using a single data
point to test a hypothesis is record naiveté, even for
a warming denier.

And can we expect when that year comes, as it surely will during the
next Solar Maximum (possibly as early as 2011) or the next serious El
Nino, that Mr Fool will declare that warming has indeed restarted?

Solar Maximum will be at max. 30-40 spots at best.
This is in between Maunder Minimum and Dalton Minimum.
There were no more seriuos El Ninos for the next 20 years, if any.
La Ninas will become stronger and 2020 we'll be at the edge of a new little
ice age. This is predictable.

I'm putting this in the bank

Dec. 21, 2006: Evidence is mounting: the next solar cycle is going to
be a big one.
************************************************** *****************

... says a greenie whacko prayer!
Keep on keeping the faith komrade!


I suspect I'm going to regret this but just out of curiosity ...

why would supporters of the AGW-hypothesis be "praying" for a high
numbwer of sunspots at Solar-24? Last time I looked, we weren't
claiming sunspots were caused by anthropogenic emissions of GHGs.

Fran