Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 18, 2:35 pm, "ozonb" wrote:
"Fran" wrote in message ... On May 18, 11:20 am, "ozonb" wrote: May 18 2009 If greenies love nature so much, why don't they live anywhere other than Australia's most urbanised areas? sigh You polluters' cartel spruikers are so pathetic. Either you are projecting your self-seeking misanthropy onto others, are moronic, or are deliberatly dissembling. Fairly obviously, there is a difference between serving one's individual interest and the collective interest. A person who merely want to solve his own aesthetic needs in the here and now would indeed be far better off living in some idyllic rural off-grid setting (assuming he or she could make a living in the place). That's not a solution that could conceivably work for more than a handful of people. Environmentalists favour making it possible for highly urbanised people to live with the smallest possible footprint consistent with people's reasonable expectations. We want to make the world a better place, rather than seek out some realtively unspoiled corner of it and erecting a keep out sign, and watching with equanimity as the rest of the planet on which that corner stands goes to hell. I don't know whether Tim Blair is simply moronic, ignorant, misanthropic, selfish or someone who tells whatever lies the polluters think will fly, but your persistent repost of his trash in here simply reminds reasonable people of the character of people you rub shoulders with. ====================================== Admit it baby, you love energy intensive urban life so much, that hell would have to freeze over before you'd consider "going bush". That's partly true. I like most of the comforts that having on demand energy makes possible. So do most people. The question is -- can most of those comforts be obtained without substantial resort to practices that will, in the fullness of time, harm others? For me, the answer is yes. For you the answer is "I hope not because I am working as an unpaid lackey of the polluters' cartel." At least, that would be your answer if you were honest. Also, you won't make "world a better place" by rationing energy! In a modest way yes it would. Fran |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Nagging Question On CO2 Levels | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
A Nagging Question On CO2 Levels | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
A Nagging Question: Will Bozo ever demonstrate intellectualcompetence? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
A Nagging Question | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
A Nagging Question | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |