Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 20, 1:43 pm, "ozonb" wrote:
May 19 2009 "Anthropogenic Global Warming is a scam, with no basis in science....... It is obvious that anthropogenic global warming is not science at all, because a scientific theory makes non-obvious predictions which are then compared with observations that the average person can check for himself. As we both know from our own observations, AGW theory has spectacularly failed to do this. The theory has predicted steadily increasing global temperatures, and this has been refuted by experience. And yet one of the people you cite favourably -- Dr John Christy says that AGW is real "It is scientifically inconceivable that after changing forests into cities, turning millions of acres into irrigated farmland, putting massive quantities of soot and dust into the air, and putting extra greenhouse gases into the air, that the natural course of climate has not changed in some way." .... Don't misunderstand me. Atmospheric carbon dioxide continues to increase due to the undisputed benefits that carbon-based energy brings to humanity. This increase will have some climate impact through CO2's radiation properties. .... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7081331.stm Christy told the New York Times that he endorsed the conclusion that "part of what has happened over the last 50 years has clearly been caused by humans." http://www.raleigheconews.com/archiv...1_archive.html |||| and beneficial. The GPC can't even lie consistently. They are making this up as they go along Fran |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 19, 11:04*pm, Fran wrote:
On May 20, 1:43 pm, "ozonb" wrote: May 19 2009 "Anthropogenic Global Warming is a scam, with no basis in science........ It is obvious that anthropogenic global warming is not science at all, because a scientific theory makes non-obvious predictions which are then compared with observations that the average person can check for himself. As we both know from our own observations, AGW theory has spectacularly failed to do this. The theory has predicted steadily increasing global temperatures, and this has been refuted by experience. And yet one of the people you cite favourably -- Dr John Christy says that AGW is real "It is scientifically inconceivable that after changing forests into cities, turning millions of acres into irrigated farmland, putting massive quantities of soot and dust into the air, and putting extra greenhouse gases into the air, that the natural course of climate has not changed in some way." ... Don't misunderstand me. Atmospheric carbon dioxide continues to increase due to the undisputed benefits that carbon-based energy brings to humanity. This increase will have some climate impact through CO2's radiation properties. ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7081331.stm Christy told the New York Times that he endorsed the conclusion that "part of what has happened over the last 50 years has clearly been caused by humans." http://www.raleigheconews.com/archiv...1_archive.html |||| and beneficial. The GPC can't even lie consistently. They are making this up as they go along Fran Anti-Global Warming hacks like Ozonb are a scam. he is probably being paid to write this **** for the energy industry who has already spent $45 million to lobby against cap and trade. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Book Debunking The AGW Scam A Top Ten Bestseller | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Book Debunking The AGW Scam A Top Ten Bestseller | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Bonzo: Robo-Liar for the Polluters' Lobby | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
AGW IS STILL A SCAM | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
AGW IS STILL A SCAM | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |