On Jul 8, 4:20 pm, "z0n0b" wrote:
"Fran" wrote in message

...
On Jul 8, 2:27 pm, Benj wrote:

On Jul 7, 11:41 pm, Fran wrote:

EVIL CO2!

You must have proponents of mitigation confused with someone who
thinks CO2 is evil. I appreciate that you rightwingers find moving
beyond manichean categorisation intellectually challenging. Maybe it's
the curse you religionists suffer, but give it a try.

Nice vocabulary, Fran. It is too bad like most liberals

oooh ... one mistake already. I'm no liberal. Ask anyone who pays
attention.

you can't say
anything logically coherent using any of it. I would have used the
word "animistic" rather than manichean.

I was asserting that the rightwingers were unable to move beyond
simple dualities -- in this case good and evil.
======================================

Huh?
What on earth does an atheist mean by "good" and "evil"??????????????

Nothing at all. These terms are, IMO, the proeprty of religionists.
Can't you read for meaning?

If they were to think their positions through properly, these two terms
would be totally meaningless.

Been there done that a very long time ago.

After all an atheistic universe is NECESSARILY totally chaotic and amoral.

We atheists have no general view about whether the universe is chaotic
and amoral. Atheism is simply the view that that gods and spirits
don't exist (or a disbelief in their existence). It doesn't prescribe
what else we think about life, the universe or anything else. Atheists
express a range of views.

Fran