Dawlish wrote:
On Jul 14, 2:30 pm, oriel36 wrote:

This is why there are no astronomers but plenty of astrologers.

I know I am going to regret this........... but
anyway...................I'm sure I'm not alone in wondering what on
earth (or space) that statement means??

Oriel36 aka Gerald Kelleher is a well known net kook on the Astronomy
groups. He has a big problem with the Earth going around the sun.

He makes even the most delusional right wing nutters look sane.

Regards,
Martin Brown

On Jul 14, 3:08*pm, Martin Brown
wrote:
Dawlish wrote:
On Jul 14, 2:30 pm, oriel36 wrote:

This is why there are no astronomers but plenty of astrologers.

I know I am going to regret this........... but
anyway...................I'm sure I'm not alone in wondering what on
earth (or space) that statement means??

Oriel36 aka Gerald Kelleher is a well known net kook on the Astronomy
groups. He has a big problem with the Earth going around the sun.

He makes even the most delusional right wing nutters look sane.

Regards,
Martin Brown

The issue of 'climate change' is nothing compared to the actual
problem - the ability to jump to reckless conclusions and then throw
the kitchen sink by distortions and fabricating data , however,I can
point out that this speculative luxury has a ground zero,a point where
it all began and the point of departure is not the Earth's orbital
motion around the Sun,it is the fact that none of you can tell how
long it takes the Earth to turn once and the reasons behind it even
when the values are in front of you -

http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/education/...s/table02.html

It is possible to construct the Earth's shape and rotational
characteristics from that table and even tell why the transition from
daylight to darkness is more rapid at the Equator and slower towards
the poles and it is all based on the fact that the Earth turns once in
24 hours,from the tables that is represented as 69.17 miles every 4
minutes and 24901.5 miles every 24 hours.

Astrologers believe in an alternative 23 hour 56 minute 04 second
value but when asked to explain the simple twilight variations for any
given latitude they cannot do it,something so simple from the table of
values above that it becomes an issue of intelligence to argue against
the 24 hour value which contains shape and rotational characteristics
in terms of distance and speed.Ask an astrologer what causes twilight
variation and a person will get the same astrological junk that people
get when they question issues of carbon dioxide and global
temperature -

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/que...php?number=121

You call me mad for believing the Earth turns once in 24 hours with
the reasoning behind it but what does that make you and the rest here.

On Jul 14, 3:08*pm, Martin Brown
wrote:
Dawlish wrote:
On Jul 14, 2:30 pm, oriel36 wrote:

This is why there are no astronomers but plenty of astrologers.

I know I am going to regret this........... but
anyway...................I'm sure I'm not alone in wondering what on
earth (or space) that statement means??

Oriel36 aka Gerald Kelleher is a well known net kook on the Astronomy
groups. He has a big problem with the Earth going around the sun.

He makes even the most delusional right wing nutters look sane.

Regards,
Martin Brown

The issue of 'climate change' is nothing compared to the actual
problem - the ability to jump to reckless conclusions and then
throwing the kitchen sink at the conclusion by distortions and
fabricating data .I can point out that this speculative luxury has a
ground zero,a point where it all began in the late 17th century around
the time Newton attempted to make terrestrial ballistics look like
planetary motion.in fact Newton built his agenda on the flawed
reasoning which leads to the point where nobody can accurately state
how long it takes the planet to turn once -

http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/education/...ts/u014/tables...


It is possible to construct the Earth's shape and rotational
characteristics from that table and even tell why the transition from
daylight to darkness is more rapid at the Equator and slower towards
the poles and it is all based on the fact that the Earth turns once in
24 hours,the Equatorial distance and speed is represented as 69.17
miles every 4 minutes/1 degree and turns 24901.5 miles every 24
hours.


Astrologers believe in an alternative 23 hour 56 minute 04 second
value but when asked to explain the simple twilight variations for any
given latitude they cannot do it,something so simple from the table of
values above that it becomes an issue of intelligence to argue against
the 24 hour value which contains shape and rotational characteristics
in terms of distance and speed.Ask an astrologer what causes twilight
variation and a person will get the same astrological junk that people
get when they question issues of carbon dioxide and global
temperature -


http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/que...php?number=121


You call me mad for believing the Earth turns once in 24 hours (even
with the reasoning behind it) but then again,the leaders of the
largest populations in the world announced last week that they are
going to control global temperature on the advice of their
scientists.I have mnake the proof for daily rotation in 24 hours so
simple that only the most indifferent can ignore it and until that
basic dynamic is understood,only then is it possible to move on to
seasonal rtemperature variations and the orbital dynamic behind that.

oriel36 wrote:
On Jul 14, 3:08 pm, Martin Brown
wrote:
Dawlish wrote:
On Jul 14, 2:30 pm, oriel36 wrote:

This is why there are no astronomers but plenty of astrologers.

I know I am going to regret this........... but
anyway...................I'm sure I'm not alone in wondering what on
earth (or space) that statement means??

Oriel36 aka Gerald Kelleher is a well known net kook on the Astronomy
groups. He has a big problem with the Earth going around the sun.

He makes even the most delusional right wing nutters look sane.

Regards,
Martin Brown

The issue of 'climate change' is nothing compared to the actual
problem - the ability to jump to reckless conclusions and then throw
the kitchen sink by distortions and fabricating data , however,I can
point out that this speculative luxury has a ground zero,a point where
it all began and the point of departure is not the Earth's orbital
motion around the Sun,it is the fact that none of you can tell how
long it takes the Earth to turn once

A pathetic lie.

oriel36 wrote:
On Jul 14, 3:08 pm, Martin Brown
wrote:
Dawlish wrote:
On Jul 14, 2:30 pm, oriel36 wrote:

This is why there are no astronomers but plenty of astrologers.

I know I am going to regret this........... but
anyway...................I'm sure I'm not alone in wondering what on
earth (or space) that statement means??

Oriel36 aka Gerald Kelleher is a well known net kook on the Astronomy
groups. He has a big problem with the Earth going around the sun.

He makes even the most delusional right wing nutters look sane.

Regards,
Martin Brown

The issue of 'climate change' is nothing compared to the actual
problem - the ability to jump to reckless conclusions and then
throwing the kitchen sink at the conclusion by distortions and
fabricating data .I can point out that this speculative luxury has a
ground zero,a point where it all began in the late 17th century around
the time Newton attempted to make terrestrial ballistics look like
planetary motion.in fact Newton built his agenda on the flawed
reasoning which leads to the point where nobody can accurately state
how long it takes the planet to turn once

A pathetic lie.