"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
JUNE WAS SECOND WARMEST ON THE 130-YEAR-LONG NASA GLOBAL LAND RECORD.

In the real world,
outside the fossil fuel industry's spin and lies,
global mean surface temperatures continue to rise.
Please see:


Surface temperatures? I asked about 3 times for the formulas as to how this
data is corrected for the urban heat effect. 3 times you linked to a
document full of crap about how the temperatures from the stations are
averaged.

I not looking for how they throw the numbers into a pot and average them, I
am looking for the formula and how the numbers are corrected for UHE.

Since you can't write out the formula in a simple paragraph as to how the
numbers are changed for UHE, then why should be accept any numbers for you
that span more then one page in a post here?

I am now not even looking for a link from you, but you now need to EXPLAIN
how the numbers are corrected for UHE. So please show the formula or
correction method used for UHE. There is no need for some silly links here
but ALL THAT is required from you is a nice simple explain + formulas used
to clarify all this **** you posted.

come on...it can't be that hard!!!

Super Turtle

On Jul 18, 4:43*pm, "Green Turtle" wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message

...

JUNE WAS SECOND WARMEST ON THE 130-YEAR-LONG NASA GLOBAL LAND RECORD.

In the real world,
outside the fossil fuel industry's spin and lies,
global mean surface temperatures continue to rise.
Please see:

Surface temperatures? I asked about 3 times for the formulas as to how this
data is corrected for the urban heat effect. 3 times you linked to a
document full of crap about how the temperatures from the stations are
averaged.

I not looking for how they throw the numbers into a pot and average them, I
am looking for the formula and how the numbers are corrected for UHE.

I can't be responsilbe for the fact you can't read, Mr. Turtle.

"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
On Jul 18, 4:43 pm, "Green Turtle" wrote:


I not looking for how they throw the numbers into a pot and average them,
I
am looking for the formula and how the numbers are corrected for UHE.

I can't be responsilbe for the fact you can't read, Mr. Turtle.

No, it not a problem of reading. It is a Refusal on your part to post the
formula used to correct for UHE.

You don't find it absolute amazing that of the 3 major temperature data
sets, the ONLY ONE that shows warming for that last 10 years is also the
one that there been NO PUBLIC disclose of how UHE is taking into account?

Why are you so scared to post a formula or equation used to correct for
UHE? Why not post this interesting piece of information for all us to see?

So, it not a question of me reading, it question of your refusal to post a
simple math equation that shows what is being done (or NOT done) to your
numbers before you post your silly ****....

So, come on...be a man and post the equation used to correct the UHE....

Super Turtle.

Green Turtle wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
JUNE WAS SECOND WARMEST ON THE 130-YEAR-LONG NASA GLOBAL LAND RECORD.

In the real world,
outside the fossil fuel industry's spin and lies,
global mean surface temperatures continue to rise.
Please see:


Surface temperatures? I asked about 3 times for the formulas as to
how this data is corrected for the urban heat effect. 3 times you
linked to a document full of crap about how the temperatures from the
stations are averaged.

I not looking for how they throw the numbers into a pot and average
them, I am looking for the formula and how the numbers are corrected
for UHE.

http://www.just****inggooglit.com

Green Turtle wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
On Jul 18, 4:43 pm, "Green Turtle" wrote:


I not looking for how they throw the numbers into a pot and average
them, I
am looking for the formula and how the numbers are corrected for
UHE.

I can't be responsilbe for the fact you can't read, Mr. Turtle.

No, it not a problem of reading. It is a Refusal on your part to
post the formula used to correct for UHE.

Sorry, not his job.