Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 25, 11:44*pm, netvegetable wrote:
Pretty amazing scam, given that it's got about 82% of scientists and pretty much every reputable scientific organisation on the planet to pay along with it. And yes, it IS a pretty amazing scam! I guess you are talking about the 82% of the scientists who have contacts or get paid by government or big corporate money who don't want to lose their jobs... And just which scientific organizations do you consider "reputable"? Let's take a poll. Just how many of those organizations have actually surveyed their membership for opinions on AGW and How many have just stated the opinions of the leadership at the top as if it were the opinion of all the members? Um. 0% to 100% perhaps? Spin, spin and more spin. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SOI, Not CO2, Drives Global Temperature | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
SOI, Not CO2, Drives Global Temperature | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
SOI, Not CO2, Drives Global Temperature | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
What drives precipitation on Florida? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Actual rain and the SOI | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |