Climate change "science" has never predicted anything correctly.

Its not "science" until it has been tested.


"netvegetable" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:27:15 -0700, Benj wrote:

On Jul 25, 11:44 pm, netvegetable wrote:

Pretty amazing scam, given that it's got about 82% of scientists and
pretty much every reputable scientific organisation on the planet to
pay along with it.

And yes, it IS a pretty amazing scam!

Excellent! A conspiracy theorist who's out the closet (unlike most
climate change deniers).

I guess you are talking about the
82% of the scientists who have contacts or get paid by government or big
corporate money who don't want to lose their jobs...

I'm sure some of them might well have contacts in government. So what?

And just which
scientific organizations do you consider "reputable"?

Can you name a single reputable scientific organisation that disputes the
theory of anthropogenic climate change? If you can I will edit the wiki
page for you.

http://tinyurl.com/y67qrl

Let's take a
poll. Just how many of those organizations have actually surveyed their
membership for opinions on AGW and How many have just stated the
opinions of the leadership at the top as if it were the opinion of all
the members? Um. 0% to 100% perhaps?

Yeah. So what?

--
"Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are
conservatives."- John Stuart Mill

http://regruntled.wordpress.com/