Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 31, 2:52 pm, "oobnz" wrote:
July 31 2009 Paying more for nothing? Why does every green fad seem the same? "Organic food has no nutritional or health benefits over ordinary food, according to a major study published Wednesday. Researchers from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine said consumers were paying higher prices for organic food because of its perceived health benefits, creating a global organic market worth an estimated $48 billion in 2007". "A systematic review of 162 scientific papers published in the scientific literature over the last 50 years, however, found there was no significant difference." In reporting this news, The Age, otherwise known as The Daily Lentil, interviews three locals - two organic food extremists who dismiss the science, and one consumer advocate who wishes butchers would advertise organic meat more conscientiously. A bit like their global warming, coverage, actually. Clearly, your interest in industry-driven junk science is not limited to the issue of climate change. How drearily predictable ... Fran |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Industry-driven Robo-liar branches out into food ... | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Industry-driven Robo-liar branches out into food ... | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Industry-driven Robo-liar branches out into food ... | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Bonzo: Robo-liar at it again ... | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Bonzo: Robo-Liar for the Polluters' Lobby | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |