Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
oonbz wrote:
Surfer patiently explained the details ignored by: -- Let me try and do better: 1) The total amount of C02 from ground level to the "top" of the atmosphere, is sufficient to absorb just about all the "reflected" heat of the specific wavelength. 2) Some critics of AGW claim that this means atmospheric CO2 can't absorb any more heat that it is already absorbing, so further increases in atmospheric CO2 can't cause further increases in global temperature. 3) However, if the concentration of CO2 is further increased, the greater concentration in the lower atmosphere will allow it to absorb more heat of that wavelength, Huh? Like I said, your lack of comprehension won't change the facts.. --What's that like, clinging to a failed political ideology? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Despite What Politically Motivated Right Wing Crackpots And FossilFuel Industry Shills Say - Scientists Overwhelmingly Warn Of Man-Made ClimateChange. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Uneducated, Ignorant Right Wing Fascist Liars Believe A Few Emails Discredit Science And Their Raving Lunacy Instead!! - They Want To Buy Terrorist Muslim Oil Forever!! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
How To Defeat "leotard78's Anti-GW Lies, tell 'em the truth.. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
How To Defeat The AGW Lies | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |