Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:51:38 -0700 (PDT), Roger Coppock
wrote: Wake up, Al! I've answered this question for you before. On Aug 5, 6:02Â*pm, Al Bedo ? wrote: Great! 1.5K/Century Not even at the IPCC best estimate of the "Low Scenario" To look at acceleration of a climate trend, one needs about 5 decades to achieve statistical significance. We'll need to wait another two decades to collect enough satellite data. Meanwhile, there are more than enough conventional ground data to see that the warming is clearly accelerating. http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/Slope1952-2007.jpg http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/hadSlope1850-2008.jpg What is the trend after the 2nd time around on a roller coaster? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RSS Satellite Data Very Clearly Show A Warming Global Climate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
RSS Satellite Data Clearly Show A Warming Global Climate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
RSS Satellite Data Clearly Show A Warming Global Climate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
RSS Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
RSS Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |