On Aug 7, 10:23 am, "oonbz" wrote:
"Fran" wrote in message

...
On Aug 6, 4:27 pm, "oonbz" wrote:





"Fran" wrote in message

....
On Aug 6, 12:25 pm, Last Post wrote:

On Aug 5, 7:42 pm, Fran wrote:

On Aug 6, 5:35 am, "Ouroboros Rex" wrote:

Last Post wrote:
On Aug 5, 2:56 am, Fran wrote:
On Aug 5, 3:13 pm, Sandy Bloxs wrote:

On Aug 5, 3:03 pm, "oonbz" wrote:

significantly since 2003.... According to the IPCC, it was
supposed to have gotten steadily warmer, but just the opposite
has
occurred.

Anybody who puts their signature to something containing the
above
line is clearly neither a scientist nor, indeed, the full quid
even.

The IPCC has never - and never would, for obvious reasons - give
its
imprimatur to the line
"it was supposed to have gotten steadily warmer".

Why would the IPCC make climate predictions that would be
instantly
and predictably falsified?

AH, I hear you say, It's yet another half-witted strawman
argument
from a bunch of Denialist dimwits, recycled as nauseum by Andrew
Dolt and his fellow-travelling idiots.

Take a look at this list.

I've been through it and not a single one has published any kind
of
analysis in a peer reviewed journal on the science of climate
change.
A number are "Diplomas" only.

There are a few geologists and engineers -- number 1 on the list
has
some sort of military background and is in "Government
relations" --
whatever that means.

Another bogus list of "scientists" who oppose the IPCC. Nothing
to
see here folks --just more disinformation from the filth
merchants.

http://tinyurl.com/filth-merchant-frauds

•• Fran is a fraud walking.

Your usual delusion.

It's always nice to watch what happens when you expose these filth
merchant clowns' activities. Abuse from Lenny and the filth merchant
fan club is music to my ears.

•• Andrew Bolt has a whole lot more brains
than you and Robot will ever have

He has already proved he hasn't by refusing to debate me. He knows I'd
expose him for the fool he is in front of his jerk circle.
======================================

So Andrew Bolt was happy to appear on the ABC's QandA and
debate that “reef-is-doomed” climate alarmist Ove Hoegh-Guldberg,
but he refused to debate you?

Are you serious komrade?

I am not your 'komrade' (sic) but I am serious. On his blog, his
comments and mine would appear in writing so his ability to talk over
the top, commit logical fallacies and lie unchallenged, etc would be
much diminished.

Professional filth merchant liars have their own list of talking
points to endlessly repeat, but in writing, your comments are
circulated forever.

And you will recall that he explicitly barred me from posting to his
blog, coward that he is.
======================================

I find it very hard to believe that Andrew found you more daunting than that
leftie ABC program QandA!.
I think you're just making it up!


You? Think? That would eb a first. But he



||||

Fran of Epping (Reply)
Fri 22 Feb 08 (01:17pm)

SNIP...If the host of this blog is so terrible and the blog itself so
terrible we advise you go somewhere else. Your IP address is banned.
Bolt Moderators.

Andrew Bolt
Fri 22 Feb 08 (01:33pm)
|||


http://tinyurl.com/blot-the-coward

Fran