Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 20, 9:51*am, (Doug Bashford) wrote:
Bjorn Lomborg, author of *"The Skeptical Environmentalist" was once hated by many environmentalists and loved by Republicans and other denialists for his book. ================= Planet Panel: The science behind global warming Washington Post - Bjorn Lomborg - 9 hours ago http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...9/AR2009101902... Planet Panel washingtonpost.com/planetpanel * Enlarge Photo Tuesday, October 20, 2009 Excerpts from comments by The Post's panel of experts on climate change. Q What doubt is there about the science behind global warming? Bjorn Lomborg, author of *"The Skeptical Environmentalist" Looking at the big picture, there is very little doubt. The vast majority of climate scientists tell us that increases in carbon dioxide cause higher temperatures over time. We know that this will mean changes in rainfall, melting of snow and ice, a rise in sea level and other impacts on plants, wildlife and humans. There is still meaningful and important work going on looking at the range of outcomes that we should expect -- it is wrong to suggest that "all of the science is in" -- but I think it is vital to emphasize the consensus on the most important scientific questions. Donald F. Boesch, president of the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Even a "skeptical scientist" would have to conclude without doubt that -- based on evidence, not just theory -- humans are raising the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere, CO2 traps heat, and the planet is accumulating heat. . . . Where the biggest doubts reside is on the human side of the global-warming equation. Despite the range of uncertainty inherent in computer models used to project future climate, they are far more reliable than the models used to estimate the economic costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Yet we are frozen in our tracks by the mere suggestion that the economic costs of reducing emissions are unaffordable or lulled into complacency by the vaguest assertion that we can just adapt to the certain warming. Go figure. For additional responses, go tohttp://washingtonpost.com/planetpanel.Follow climate change policy news athttp://washingtonpost.com/climate. The GW denialists's wild-eyed, anti-science hysteria looks more silly every day, doesn't it? But what does the actual Science say? image: graph: Comparison of ground based (blue) and satellite based (red: UAH; green: RSS) records of temperature variations since 1979. Trends plotted since January 1982. *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sa...mperatures.png If it were now 1985 or 1993, etc, down-spikes, you'd be squealing "SEE -- PROOF! THE WORLD IS COOLING! EEK!" Silly GW denialists! *But who can blame them? They're snorting a deadly mind-numbing cocktail of Fox Cartoon News and Clown Limbaugh! Dear God, Please Give America back to the decent folks, where manners, civility, thoughtfulness, and common decency isn't called wimpy & disdainfully called "politically correct". ......... Truth is stranger than fiction: USA Today/Gallup poll - LIMBAUGH is the REPUBLICAN LEADER ! *"Who speaks for the Republican party?" RUSH LIMBAUGH... Both Repubs and Dems agree. Cheney is #2! *-- only 7% of America is Favorable to Republicans * *- If you scratch a cynic, * *- you'll find a defeated idealist. I couldn't agree with you more |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Denialist # 1, Bjorn Lomborg FLIP FLOPS on GW !! - The Sciencebehind global warming - 9 hours ago | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Explaining Science to a Global Warming Denialist | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Explaining Science to a Global Warming Denialist | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
WHY are there so many Global Warming Denialists????? insidethe head of a denialist, David Deming of OU.. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
WHY are there so many Global Warming Denialists????? inside thehead of a denialist. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |