| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
November 25th 09, 09:00 AM
posted to sci.geo.meteorology,uk.politics.environment
|
|||
|
|||
Foster isn't a scientist. Why should he take part in a scientific debate?
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:29:36 -0800 (PST), C. P. wrote:
Foster isn't a scientist. Why should he take part in a scientific debate? posting-host=173.34.22.250 |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Science Is A Pack Of Lies! - Opinion By Non Scientist Peter Foster | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
| Foster isn't a scientist. Why should he take part in a scientific debate? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
| Foster isn't a scientist. Why should he take part in a scientificdebate? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
| Foster isn't a scientist. Why should he take part in a scientificdebate? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
| Leading climate scientist: 'democratic process isn't working' | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
![Peter Muehlbauer[_3_] is offline](https://www.weather-banter.co.uk/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Linear Mode
