On Dec 1, 3:39*pm, crunch wrote:
I apologize; I'm sorry. *I thought you were somebody
else who has the same name, who indeed has been
impolite to me on sci.arch over time.

Does that mean you'll be dreaming up a different pathetic and lame
excuse for not answering the question, or will you just try to change
the subject?

On Dec 1, 6:47*pm, Sir David wrote:
On Dec 1, 3:39*pm, crunch wrote:

I apologize; I'm sorry. *I thought you were somebody
else who has the same name, who indeed has been
impolite to me on sci.arch over time.

Does that mean you'll be dreaming up a different pathetic and lame
excuse for not answering the question, or will you just try to change
the subject?

No. And, I want to learn more about the VERY
abrupt termination of the Younger Dryas.

I don't suppose you have a meteorological
background. (No, it can't be.)

-----

David Christainsen

On Dec 1, 8:11*pm, crunch wrote:
Does that mean you'll be dreaming up a different pathetic and lame
excuse for not answering the question, or will you just try to change
the subject?

No.

I see. So yo'll just dodge the the questions without changing the
subject or making lame excuses?

I don't suppose you have a meteorological
background. (No, it can't be.)

Well, there you go again, you changed the subject after lying about
it. Not that anyone's surprised; lying and subject-changing and
question-dodging are some of your favorite games. Games you like to
play, depsite the fact that you always lose. What's more, you don't
have a meteorological background. If you did, you could say what that
background is, rather than simply making self-aggrandizing but
unsupportable claims. Any real meteorologist, when asked what his
background is, can cite his credentials, his education, his
experience. But you can't. When asked what your meteorological
background is, you dodge the questions, change the subject, and lie.
And as surely as day follows night, you climb back on your hobbyhorse
and loudly proclaim that you are not riding a hobbyhorse.

Sucks to be Crunchy. Sucks to be you.

Nobody likes you, everybody hates you, you'll just have to go crunch
worms. Great big slimy ones, itty bitty fuzzy ones, guess you'll go
eat worms. Down goes the first one, down goes the second one, oh how
they crunch and squirm (just like YOU, Crunchy!). Up comes the first
one, up comes the second one, crunchy crunchy Carl crunches worms.
Sucks to be you. You never learn anything. Your brain is too small.
The worms' brains are bigger than yours. Sucks to be you.

On Dec 1, 8:53*pm, Sir David wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:11*pm, crunch wrote:

Does that mean you'll be dreaming up a different pathetic and lame
excuse for not answering the question, or will you just try to change
the subject?

No.

I see. So yo'll just dodge the the questions without changing the
subject or making lame excuses?

Yup. No more lame excuses, but you're still dodging the questions. Of
course, it's because you have no answer, because you're an idiot with
a shoe-size for an IQ.