http://www.rr-bb.com/showthread.php?p=1599360

"It’s been nearly two weeks since a scandal shook many people’s faith
in the scientists behind global warming alarmism."

-----

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

On Dec 2, 6:39*pm, Carl rode his hobbyhorse:
flush Carl's latest hobbyhorse

Did you forget that Fock Snooze has been riding your hobbyhorse for
you? Have you noticed that there are more than three networks now? Or
have you had your head up your ass since the seventies?

crunch wrote:
http://www.rr-bb.com/showthread.php?p=1599360

"It’s been nearly two weeks since a scandal shook many people’s faith
in the scientists behind global warming alarmism."

Horse****. It's been all over the news.

You might want to be a bit more discerning about what sources you
use. This reich-wing bb and the WSJ are not exactly referred
journals.

--
Tom

When Tyrants tremble, sick with fear,
And hear their death-knell ringing;
When friends rejoice, both far and near,
How can I keep from singing.

On Dec 2, 7:20*pm, Tom McDonald wrote:
crunch wrote:
http://www.rr-bb.com/showthread.php?p=1599360

"It’s been nearly two weeks since a scandal shook many people’s faith
in the scientists behind global warming alarmism."

Horse****. It's been all over the news.

You might want to be a bit more discerning about what sources you
use. This reich-wing bb and the WSJ are not exactly referred
journals.
...

Respectfully, I believe your own prejudices are getting
in the way of your understanding of the climategate story.
I am a meteorologist (synoptic meteorology under Prof. (MIT)
Sanders) with a degree in political science; this is not you.

Don't overlook that here the report concerns the 3
networks. Further, the NY Times has yet even to mention
Dr. Svensmark of Denmark for his work with cosmic
rays influencing cloud cover. So, there has always been difficulty
for mainstream US press to cover the climate story accurately.
(Eric Stevens of sci.archaeology once brought attention onto
Dr. Svensmark and called his work Nobel-prizewinning.)

Here's a heads-up; follow in close detail Brett Anderson's
Global Warming Blog. (I respect Brett professionally as
a meteorologist and for his integrity.) -

http://www.accuweather.com/global-wa...her&traveler=0

Also, I think you are under-estimating the integrity of WSJ to
get on the story. Earlier, I gave the link to Prof. (MIT) Lindzen's
brilliant article. His commentary is authoritative. If you think
differently, I want to hear why.

-----

The Climate Science Isn't Settled
Confident predictions of catastrophe are unwarranted
By RICHARD S. LINDZEN
(Mr. Lindzen is professor of meteorology at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology.)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...p_mostpop_read

-----

David Christainsen - Meteorologist

On Dec 3, 9:57*am, Carl lied:
I am a meteorologist flush

No you're not. You're a lying spamming troll.