wrote in message
...

Rep. Issa: Obama's refusal to investigate 'Climategate' emails is
'unconscionable'
By Tony Romm - 12/04/09 12:52 PM ET

The U.N.'s decision this week to investigate whether some of its
climate change research had been manipulated constitutes a "direct
rebuke" of the Obama administration, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said
Friday.

well... of course the obstructicans would posture so... that's all they know
how to do...


The White House's unwillingness to open a similar inquiry could now
only be characterized as "a sad abdication of their responsibility to
ensure that U.S. policies are not driven by corrupted science and
data," the congressman added.

lol... since the government's responsibility does not extend into
warrantless wiretapping of every conversation taking place within the
scientific or other communities, you should be thankful that your taxes
aren't being quadrupled as a result of funding such a paranoia-driven form
of fascist rule...

it is the responsibility of the representative body to resolve internal
issues before presenting conclusions to the government... and it is not the
government's role to interfere in the normal course of operations precisely
because the government is simply neither qualified nor capable of addressing
such minutiae....


“The very integrity of the report that the Obama administration has
predicated much of its climate change policy has been called into
question and it is unconscionable that this administration and
Congress is willing to abdicate responsibility of uncovering the truth
to the United Nations," explained Issa, the ranking member on the
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

again... these internal emails, taken out of context and divorced from
reality bear no relevance to any and all reports forwarded to any outside
agency... and much less to imbecilic busybodies like you who clearly care
not in the least what their lack of significance means to the issues at
stake...


Motivating Issa's calls for a probe into climate change research, and
the U.N.'s decision to launch one, was the publication last month of
thousands of e-mails and other documents that global warming skeptics
say prove the phenomenon does not exist.

only idiots who haven't researched this issue in any depth would strive to
invent canards to support their positions because, and let's be honest about
this... this is an issue which is far too complex for pea-brains to
apprehend...


Some of those e-mails contained discussions about how to best portray
data sets, among other topics. Scientists maintain their comments have
been taken out of context, but those who fiercely oppose the climate
change thesis argue the e-mails invalidate all the research.

lol... it truly is remarkably funny how you can post this garbage about lack
of context when your fallback position to your inability to substantiate
your own sig is a misapplied contention that criticism of it is out of
context...

do you see the irony here or are you simply either too stupid or too
dishonest and disingenuous to care... my money is on both being true....


The U.N. announced it would probe that data this week, mostly because
some of the research in question touches on related work either
completed or promoted by its own Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC).

lol... of course the u.n. would say that because that's what their role is
and that's what they've been doing all along, stupid....


But the White House has largely dismissed the litany of Republican
calls to open an inquiry into that research — Issa's included —
because its top scientists contend one controversy hardly undermines
decades of more reliable research on climate change.

.....because obstructicons only want to hamper government from accomplishing
important and necessary goals so that they can claim the current government
is incapable of governing... exaggerating manufactured conspiracies is
really the only alternative they have to offer to a government which strives
to be capable and responsible...


"It is important to understand that these kinds of controversies and
even accusations of bias and improper manipulation are not all that
uncommon in science, in all branches of science," said Dr. John
Holdren, the president's science adviser.
Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...nconscionable-

it is also important to understand that most of these controversies occur
behind closed doors because imbeciles like you will use these as fodder for
furthering your blind stupidity....


— —
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural phenomena


and again... here is your inept application of a sig which is
context-complete and entirely within the realm of the subject and which
demonstrates that you clearly are too stupid to comprehend exactly how you
are only contributing toward making things worse for everyone... including
your own progeny... be sure to keep a record of all your activities to pass
on to your children so that their children will know who to revile and
why.... ;-)

klunk wrote
wrote in message
...

Rep. Issa: Obama's refusal to investigate 'Climategate' emails is
'unconscionable'
By Tony Romm - 12/04/09 12:52 PM ET

The U.N.'s decision this week to investigate whether some of its
climate change research had been manipulated constitutes a "direct
rebuke" of the Obama administration, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said
Friday.

well... of course the obstructicans would posture so... that's all they know
how to do...


Yeah, the only ones who are speaking out about it are morons like Issa and
Inhofe, who considers the entire global warming thing "finally over".

When is his victory parade? He's taken over $1 million in funding from oil
and coal companies (he represents Oklahoma), is a toothless old git in his
'70's who also believes that Fred and Wilma Flintstone rode "Dino" (their pet
generic sauropod/prosauropod type) to work at Mr. Slate's Quarry every day!

Rand wrote

klunk wrote
wrote in message
...

Rep. Issa: Obama's refusal to investigate 'Climategate' emails is
'unconscionable'
By Tony Romm - 12/04/09 12:52 PM ET

The U.N.'s decision this week to investigate whether some of its
climate change research had been manipulated constitutes a "direct
rebuke" of the Obama administration, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said
Friday.

well... of course the obstructicans would posture so... that's all they know
how to do...


Yeah, the only ones who are speaking out about it are morons like Issa and
Inhofe, who considers the entire global warming thing "finally over".

When is his victory parade? He's taken over $1 million in funding from oil
and coal companies (he represents Oklahoma), is a toothless old git in his
'70's who also believes that Fred and Wilma Flintstone rode "Dino" (their pet
generic sauropod/prosauropod type) to work at Mr. Slate's Quarry every day!

You also need to check out the guy who posts in alt.global-warming named
"James". He's a creationist who believes that hydrocarbons like oil actually
come from rocks, not from what every credible geologist says.

He's always citing amazing bull crap. I imagine that he thinks that the
Canadian Shield is full of oil, because oil comes from rocks!

If so, I've got a used up copper mine outside of Timmins Ontario that he can
buy! He can set up the oil derricks and go for it!

Think of it! Sudbury Ontario and Timmins! The oil capitals of the world!

Kook city man! Kook city.

On Dec 4, 6:32*pm, "klunk" wrote:
wrote in message

...



Rep. Issa: Obama's refusal to investigate 'Climategate' emails is
'unconscionable'
By Tony Romm - 12/04/09 12:52 PM ET

The U.N.'s decision this week to investigate whether some of its
climate change research had been manipulated constitutes a "direct
rebuke" of the Obama administration, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said
Friday.

well... of course the obstructicans would posture so... that's all they know
how to do...

•• Are you sure you know of what you are saying
It is apparent that you do no Sir Klunkhead

The White House's unwillingness to open a similar inquiry could now
only be characterized as "a sad abdication of their responsibility to
ensure that U.S. policies are not driven by corrupted science and
data," the congressman added.

lol... since the government's responsibility does not extend into
warrantless wiretapping of every conversation taking place within the
scientific or other communities, you should be thankful that your taxes
aren't being quadrupled as a result of funding such a paranoia-driven form
of fascist rule...

•• Indeed fascist rule is what you got with
Barak Hussein Mohammad Obama and
Nancy Pelosi. Your ignorance is on display
here. fascism is an extension of socialism.
Socialism = liberalism = fascism

Fascism = BIG government = high taxes

20th century fascist leaders

Thomas Woodrow Wilson USA
Vladimir Lenin USSR
Benito Mussolini Italy
David Lloyd George UK
Adolf Hitler DE
Franklin Delano Roosevelt USA
Generalissimo Francisco Franco Spain
Fulgencio Batista y Zaldívar Cuba
John F Kennedy USA
James Earle Carter USA
William Jefferson Clinton USA
Barak Hussein Mohammad Obama USA

I have left out Chiang and Mao. in China Ho in
Viet, Suharto, and a flock of them in Central
and South America


“The very integrity of the report that the Obama administration has
predicated much of its climate change policy has been called into
question and it is unconscionable that this administration and
Congress is willing to abdicate responsibility of uncovering the truth
to the United Nations," explained Issa, the ranking member on the
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

again... these internal emails, taken out of context and divorced from
reality bear no relevance to any and all reports forwarded to any outside
agency... and much less to imbecilic busybodies like you who clearly care
not in the least what their lack of significance means to the issues at
stake...

•• Every other word in your screed is false
Obama promised an open government
but there is nothing open about Obama


Motivating Issa's calls for a probe into climate change research, and
the U.N.'s decision to launch one, was the publication last month of
thousands of e-mails and other documents that global warming skeptics
say prove the phenomenon does not exist.

only idiots who haven't researched this issue in any depth would strive to
invent canards to support their positions because, and let's be honest about
this... this is an issue which is far too complex for pea-brains to
apprehend...

•• Klunkhead is the one inventing canards


Some of those e-mails contained discussions about how to best portray
data sets, among other topics. Scientists maintain their comments have
been taken out of context, but those who fiercely oppose the climate
change thesis argue the e-mails invalidate all the research.

lol... it truly is remarkably funny how you can post this garbage about lack
of context when your fallback position to your inability to substantiate
your own sig is a misapplied contention that criticism of it is out of
context...

•• ROTFLMAO


do you see the irony here or are you simply either too stupid or too
dishonest and disingenuous to care... my money is on both being true....

The U.N. announced it would probe that data this week, mostly because
some of the research in question touches on related work either
completed or promoted by its own Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC).

lol... of course the u.n. would say that because that's what their role is
and that's what they've been doing all along, stupid....

But the White House has largely dismissed the litany of Republican
calls to open an inquiry into that research — Issa's included —
because its top scientists contend one controversy hardly undermines
decades of more reliable research on climate change.

....because obstructicons only want to hamper government from accomplishing
important and necessary goals so that they can claim the current government
is incapable of governing... exaggerating manufactured conspiracies is
really the only alternative they have to offer to a government which strives
to be capable and responsible...

"It is important to understand that these kinds of controversies and
even accusations of bias and improper manipulation are not all that
uncommon in science, in all branches of science," said Dr. John
Holdren, the president's science adviser.
Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...rep-issa-white...

•• Holdren is another fascist crook

it is also important to understand that most of these controversies occur
behind closed doors because imbeciles like you will use these as fodder for
furthering your blind stupidity....

•• ROTFLMAO

| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural phenomena

and again... here is your inept application of a sig which is
context-complete and entirely within the realm of the subject and which
demonstrates that you clearly are too stupid to comprehend exactly how you
are only contributing toward making things worse for everyone... including
your own progeny... be sure to keep a record of all your activities to pass
on to your children so that their children will know who to revile and
why.... ;-)

•• Oh, just another oh so clever one, citing a snippet
from a signature, divorced from context and
without any reference to the subject.

—*—
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural phenomena

wrote in message
...
On Dec 4, 6:32 pm, "klunk" wrote:
wrote in message

...



Rep. Issa: Obama's refusal to investigate 'Climategate' emails is
'unconscionable'
By Tony Romm - 12/04/09 12:52 PM ET

The U.N.'s decision this week to investigate whether some of its
climate change research had been manipulated constitutes a "direct
rebuke" of the Obama administration, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said
Friday.

well... of course the obstructicans would posture so... that's all they
know
how to do...

•• Are you sure you know of what you are saying
It is apparent that you do no Sir Klunkhead

apparently, you have not a clue wtf you are saying... you're just tossing
out chunks of idiot crap like you're having a stupidity convulsion...


The White House's unwillingness to open a similar inquiry could now
only be characterized as "a sad abdication of their responsibility to
ensure that U.S. policies are not driven by corrupted science and
data," the congressman added.

lol... since the government's responsibility does not extend into
warrantless wiretapping of every conversation taking place within the
scientific or other communities, you should be thankful that your taxes
aren't being quadrupled as a result of funding such a paranoia-driven
form
of fascist rule...

•• Indeed fascist rule is what you got with
Barak Hussein Mohammad Obama and
Nancy Pelosi. Your ignorance is on display
here. fascism is an extension of socialism.
Socialism = liberalism = fascism

Fascism = BIG government = high taxes

20th century fascist leaders

Thomas Woodrow Wilson USA
Vladimir Lenin USSR
Benito Mussolini Italy
David Lloyd George UK
Adolf Hitler DE
Franklin Delano Roosevelt USA
Generalissimo Francisco Franco Spain
Fulgencio Batista y Zaldívar Cuba
John F Kennedy USA
James Earle Carter USA
William Jefferson Clinton USA
Barak Hussein Mohammad Obama USA

I have left out Chiang and Mao. in China Ho in
Viet, Suharto, and a flock of them in Central
and South America

wow.... you certainly DO know how to toss those chunks... I am curious
however, do you have to be on or off your meds to vomit so much
stupidity...?...



“The very integrity of the report that the Obama administration has
predicated much of its climate change policy has been called into
question and it is unconscionable that this administration and
Congress is willing to abdicate responsibility of uncovering the truth
to the United Nations," explained Issa, the ranking member on the
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

again... these internal emails, taken out of context and divorced from
reality bear no relevance to any and all reports forwarded to any outside
agency... and much less to imbecilic busybodies like you who clearly care
not in the least what their lack of significance means to the issues at
stake...

•• Every other word in your screed is false
Obama promised an open government
but there is nothing open about Obama

and yet... you fail to address the actual substance of the criticism in
favour of tossing out more stupidity chunks... these ones however, appear to
be siphoned directly from your anus...


Motivating Issa's calls for a probe into climate change research, and
the U.N.'s decision to launch one, was the publication last month of
thousands of e-mails and other documents that global warming skeptics
say prove the phenomenon does not exist.

only idiots who haven't researched this issue in any depth would strive
to
invent canards to support their positions because, and let's be honest
about
this... this is an issue which is far too complex for pea-brains to
apprehend...

•• Klunkhead is the one inventing canards

and yet... you continue to prove yourself too stupid to actually provide any
sort of meaningful insight you might have derived were you capable of such
things as intelligent reasoning or independent thought... instead... you
continue to hurl more stupidity chunks... albeit, your convulsions seem to
have abated somewhat here...



Some of those e-mails contained discussions about how to best portray
data sets, among other topics. Scientists maintain their comments have
been taken out of context, but those who fiercely oppose the climate
change thesis argue the e-mails invalidate all the research.

lol... it truly is remarkably funny how you can post this garbage about
lack
of context when your fallback position to your inability to substantiate
your own sig is a misapplied contention that criticism of it is out of
context...

•• ROTFLMAO

okay now... perhaps you should stop and take a breather before you choke on
those stupidity chunks....



do you see the irony here or are you simply either too stupid or too
dishonest and disingenuous to care... my money is on both being true....

The U.N. announced it would probe that data this week, mostly because
some of the research in question touches on related work either
completed or promoted by its own Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC).

lol... of course the u.n. would say that because that's what their role
is
and that's what they've been doing all along, stupid....

But the White House has largely dismissed the litany of Republican
calls to open an inquiry into that research — Issa's included —
because its top scientists contend one controversy hardly undermines
decades of more reliable research on climate change.

....because obstructicons only want to hamper government from
accomplishing
important and necessary goals so that they can claim the current
government
is incapable of governing... exaggerating manufactured conspiracies is
really the only alternative they have to offer to a government which
strives
to be capable and responsible...

"It is important to understand that these kinds of controversies and
even accusations of bias and improper manipulation are not all that
uncommon in science, in all branches of science," said Dr. John
Holdren, the president's science adviser.
Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...rep-issa-white...

•• Holdren is another fascist crook

hmmmm... yet another feeble accusation you've culled from your anus which
contradicts your own sig... after all, you DO claim it is the propositioner
who bears the responsibility of proof... where's your proof, dickhead...?...


it is also important to understand that most of these controversies occur
behind closed doors because imbeciles like you will use these as fodder
for
furthering your blind stupidity....

•• ROTFLMAO

lol... more dry heaves, eh...?... perhaps if you stopped siphoning all those
chunks from your anus, you might have better luck with your breathing....


| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural phenomena

and again... here is your inept application of a sig which is
context-complete and entirely within the realm of the subject and which
demonstrates that you clearly are too stupid to comprehend exactly how
you
are only contributing toward making things worse for everyone...
including
your own progeny... be sure to keep a record of all your activities to
pass
on to your children so that their children will know who to revile and
why.... ;-)

•• Oh, just another oh so clever one, citing a snippet
from a signature, divorced from context and
without any reference to the subject.

oh... yet another cut and paste stupidity chunk that you've processed into
an idiot evasion of your own sig...


— —
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural phenomena

wrong, stupid... on SEVERAL counts that you have yet to address... but...
being a imbecilic hypocrite appears quite a natural talent of yours.... ;-)

klunk wrote
apparently, you have not a clue wtf you are saying... you're just tossing
out chunks of idiot crap like you're having a stupidity convulsion...


Lenny is a sick puppy.

When you back Lenoard into a corner, he never has facts.

Here is what he says: (he's a nut case)

There are three types of people that you can_not_talk into behaving well. The
stupid, the rightist religious fanatic, and the evil rightist. 1-The right wing
stupid aren't smart enough to follow the logic of what you say. You have to
tell them what is right in very simple terms. If they don't agree, then you'll
never be able to change their mind. 2- the right wing religious fanatic If what
you say goes against their religious belief, they will cling to that religious
belief even if it means their death." 3- There is no way to reform evil Not in
a million years. There is no way to convince the right wing terrorists, anti-
science anthropogenic global warming deniers, serial killers, right wing
paedophiles, and predators to change their evil ways. They knew what they were
doing was wrong, but that knowledge didn't stop them. It only made them more
careful in how they went about performing their evil acts.



That's Lenny's standard reply when he has nothing to say.

He's a mental case.

On Dec 5, 12:08*am, "klunk" wrote:
wrote in message

...



On Dec 4, 6:32 pm, "klunk" wrote:
wrote in message

....

Rep. Issa: Obama's refusal to investigate 'Climategate' emails is
'unconscionable'
By Tony Romm - 12/04/09 12:52 PM ET

The U.N.'s decision this week to investigate whether some of its
climate change research had been manipulated constitutes a "direct
rebuke" of the Obama administration, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said
Friday.

well... of course the obstructicans would posture so... that's all they
know
how to do...

•• Are you sure you know of what you are saying
* *It is apparent that you do know Sir Klunkhead

apparently, you have not a clue wtf you are saying... you're just tossing
out chunks of idiot crap like you're having a stupidity convulsion...

•• ROTFLMAO
The Klunkhead has no clue about
independent thought, yet his writing
resembles the product of a very
small flock of sheep

•• You are so boring I have no intellectual
challenge.


•• Before I go, I find this in Wikipedia
which has some resemblance to you

"Klunk was the evil counterpart of Clank
whose homeworld was planet Mariona.[1]
He was created by Dr. Nefarious to act as
a spy impersonating Clank."

——*——
There are three types of people that you
can_not_talk_into_behaving_well. The
stupid, the religious fanatic, and the evil.

1- The stupid aren't smart enough to follow the
logic of what you say. You have to tell them
what is right in very simple terms. If they do
not agree, you will never be able to change
their mind.
[ . . .]

wrote in message
...
On Dec 5, 12:08 am, "klunk" wrote:
wrote in message

...



On Dec 4, 6:32 pm, "klunk" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Rep. Issa: Obama's refusal to investigate 'Climategate' emails is
'unconscionable'
By Tony Romm - 12/04/09 12:52 PM ET

The U.N.'s decision this week to investigate whether some of its
climate change research had been manipulated constitutes a "direct
rebuke" of the Obama administration, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.)
said
Friday.

well... of course the obstructicans would posture so... that's all
they
know
how to do...

•• Are you sure you know of what you are saying
It is apparent that you do know Sir Klunkhead

apparently, you have not a clue wtf you are saying... you're just tossing
out chunks of idiot crap like you're having a stupidity convulsion...

•• ROTFLMAO
The Klunkhead has no clue about
independent thought, yet his writing
resembles the product of a very
small flock of sheep

and yet... your pitiful retorts are the sorts that even brainless sheep
would find less impactful than being swatted by a puffball...

•• You are so boring I have no intellectual
challenge.

and yet... you continue to fail to address the criticisms I've made and have
allowed our exchanges to descend into ****ing contests where even here on
this level of stupidity, you are outclassed... try again stupid, because
your efforts are only resulting in you ****ting all over yourself...



•• Before I go, I find this in Wikipedia
which has some resemblance to you

"Klunk was the evil counterpart of Clank
whose homeworld was planet Mariona.[1]
He was created by Dr. Nefarious to act as
a spy impersonating Clank."

ROTFLMAO... congratulations, stupid... you've managed to actually conduct a
search on wikipedia to determine other incarnations of the nym, klunk... how
so very astute for an elementary-level of intellect... now... let's see you
actually rise up to the greater challenge of finding some substantial
arguments which can support your idiotic propaganda pieces that you cull
from the depths of the world of stupidity to create a class of mindless
denial zombies who haven't the foggiest how to begin interpreting an issue
as complex as climate change...

perhaps you can also spend some time poring over tomes on rhetoric to
discern exactly how it is that your idiotic sig only renders you a brainless
hypocrite for your inability to defend it...

—— ——
There are three types of people that you
can_not_talk_into_behaving_well. The
stupid, the religious fanatic, and the evil.

funny how it is you not only epitomize such a statement, but you also remain
entirely oblivious to the fact that you do... hell... I suspect you don't
even know wtf I just meant by that... but, here stupid... a better source of
saying something similar which actually bears more relevance to the issue of
your blind stupidity and which more accurately describes its natu

"He who will not reason is a bigot; he who cannot is a fool; and he who
dares not is a slave."


1- The stupid aren't smart enough to follow the
logic of what you say. You have to tell them
what is right in very simple terms. If they do
not agree, you will never be able to change
their mind.
[ . . .]

well stupid... clearly, you've demonstrated an abysmal capacity for
actually refuting the logic within the criticisms my posts because you have
yet to address any of them... and by the very fact that you've chosen to
direct these exchanges toward ****ing contests, you've also only proven you
lack the capacity to comprehend the rudimentary logic contained within
them...

so... thanks for demonstrating that the best you can do is to post idiot
propaganda pieces that you run away like a cowardly freak from defending
while tossing rancid chunks when tasked to live up to the very quotes you
ineptly apply like true hypocrites do.. ;-)

"Pete" wrote in message
T...
klunk wrote
apparently, you have not a clue wtf you are saying... you're just tossing
out chunks of idiot crap like you're having a stupidity convulsion...


Lenny is a sick puppy.


When the losers can NOT attack the message, they attack the messenger.
Typical of the left which has made an art of derogation.

On Dec 5, 4:41*am, "klunk" wrote:
wrote in message

...



On Dec 5, 12:08 am, "klunk" wrote:
wrote in message

....

On Dec 4, 6:32 pm, "klunk" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Rep. Issa: Obama's refusal to investigate 'Climategate' emails is
'unconscionable'
By Tony Romm - 12/04/09 12:52 PM ET

The U.N.'s decision this week to investigate whether some of its
climate change research had been manipulated constitutes a "direct
rebuke" of the Obama administration, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.)
said
Friday.

well... of course the obstructicans would posture so... that's all
they
know
how to do...

•• Are you sure you know of what you are saying
* *It is apparent that you do know Sir Klunkhead

apparently, you have not a clue wtf you are saying... you're just tossing
out chunks of idiot crap like you're having a stupidity convulsion...

•• ROTFLMAO
* *The Klunkhead has no clue about
* * independent thought, yet his writing
* * resembles the product of a very
* * small flock of sheep

and yet... your pitiful retorts are the sorts that even brainless sheep
would find less impactful than being swatted by a puffball...

•• You are so boring I have no intellectual
* *challenge.

and yet... you continue to fail to address the criticisms I've made and have
allowed our exchanges to descend into ****ing contests where even here on
this level of stupidity, you are outclassed... try again stupid, because
your efforts are only resulting in you ****ting all over yourself...



•• Before I go, I find this in Wikipedia
* *which has some resemblance to you

"Klunk was the evil counterpart of Clank
*whose homeworld was planet Mariona.[1]
*He was created by Dr. Nefarious to act as
*a spy impersonating Clank."

ROTFLMAO... congratulations, stupid... you've managed to actually conduct a
search on wikipedia to determine other incarnations of the nym, klunk... how
so very astute for an elementary-level of intellect... now... let's see you
actually rise up to the greater challenge of finding some substantial
arguments which can support your idiotic propaganda pieces that you cull
from the depths of the world of stupidity to create a class of mindless
denial zombies who haven't the foggiest how to begin interpreting an issue
as complex as climate change...

perhaps you can also spend some time poring over tomes on rhetoric to
discern exactly how it is that your idiotic sig only renders you a brainless
hypocrite for your inability to defend it...

—— ——
There are three types of people that you
can_not_talk_into_behaving_well. The
stupid, the religious fanatic, and the evil.

funny how it is you not only epitomize such a statement, but you also remain
entirely oblivious to the fact that you do... hell... I suspect you don't
even know wtf I just meant by that... but, here stupid... a better source of
saying something similar which actually bears more relevance to the issue of
your blind stupidity and which more accurately describes its natu

"He who will not reason is a bigot; he who cannot is a fool; and he who
dares not is a slave."

1- The stupid aren't smart enough to follow the
* *logic of what you say. You have to tell them
* *what is right in very simple terms. If they do
* *not agree, you will never be able to change
* *their mind.
[ . . .]

well stupid... *clearly, you've demonstrated an abysmal capacity for
actually refuting the logic within the criticisms my posts because you have
yet to address any of them... and by the very fact that you've chosen to
direct these exchanges toward ****ing contests, you've also only proven you
lack the capacity to comprehend the rudimentary logic contained within

•• ROTFLMAO
There is "NO LOGIC" in anthing yo have posted

so... thanks for demonstrating that the best you can do is to post idiot
propaganda pieces that you run away like a cowardly freak from defending
while tossing rancid chunks when tasked to live up to the very quotes you
ineptly apply like true hypocrites do.. *

•• Poor poor Klunkhead is losing it!!!