Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 7, 6:37*am, Surfer wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 18:15:37 +1100, "Peter Webb" wrote: Making the original data available for review is part of the scientific process. False. False? The scientific process requires that results can be independently confirmed. Yeah. Now address the issue. The ideal way is for each group to independently make its own measurements and record its own raw data. * Bull****. CRU is hiding data. There is no excuse for this. If different groups used the same raw data, then their results would not be truely independent. In the case we are considering:https://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media.../nov/CRUupdate Start extract There is excellent agreement on the course of temperature change since 1881 between the data set that we contribute to (HadCRUT3) and two other, independent analyses of worldwide temperature measurements. There are no statistically significant differences between the warming trends in the three series since the start of the 20th century. The three independent global temperature data series have been assembled by: • CRU and the Met Office Hadley Centre (HadCRUT3) in the UK. • The National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in Asheville, NC, USA. • The Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS), part of the National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA) in New York. The warming shown by the HadCRUT3 series between the averages of the two periods (1850-99 and 2001-2005) was 0.76±0.19°C, and this is corroborated by the other two data sets. End extract From a scientific point of view this is adequate confirmation. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:18:05 -0800 (PST), Claudius Denk
wrote: On Dec 7, 6:37*am, Surfer wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 18:15:37 +1100, "Peter Webb" wrote: Making the original data available for review is part of the scientific process. False. False? The scientific process requires that results can be independently confirmed. Yeah. Now address the issue. The ideal way is for each group to independently make its own measurements and record its own raw data. * Bull****. CRU is hiding data. There is no excuse for this. That's a political consideration. Private companies that do scientific research are under no obligation to reveal their raw data. From a scientific point of view it makes no difference. In science the important thing is whether or not results can be independently confirmed by other research groups. CRU has published its results and other research groups have obtained similar results. That is sufficient to confirm that CRU's results are basically sound. Eg. GISS (Goddard Institute for Space Studies) Surface Temperature Analysis got simlar results to CRU. http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/ Incidentally GISS seems to be making its data and computer programs publically available. http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/ Start extract Programs used in the GISTEMP analysis and documentation on their use are available for download. The programs assume a Unix-like operating system and require familiarity with FORTRAN, C and Python for installation and use. snip Table Data: Global and Zonal Mean Anomalies dTs Plain text files in tabular format of temperature anomalies. Anomaly values indicate the difference from the corresponding 1951-1980 means. * Global-mean monthly, annual and seasonal dTs based on met.station data, 1880-present, updated through most recent month * Northern Hemisphere-mean monthly, annual and seasonal dTs based on met.station data, 1880-present, updated through most recent month * Southern Hemisphere-mean monthly, annual and seasonal dTs based on met.station data, 1880-present, updated through most recent month * Global-mean monthly, annual and seasonal land-ocean temperature index, 1880-present, updated through most recent month * Northern Hemisphere-mean monthly, annual and seasonal land-ocean temperature index, 1880-present, updated through most recent month * Southern Hemisphere-mean monthly, annual and seasonal land-ocean temperature index, 1880-present, updated through most recent month * Zonal-mean annual dTs, 1880-present, updated through most recent complete calendar year * Zonal-mean annual land-ocean temperature index, 1880-present, updated through most recent completed year End extract That may allow you to check how the results were obtained, if you really wish to do so. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Climategate Stunner: NASA Heads Knew NASA Data Was Poor, Then Used Data from CRU | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
CRU climate data was already 'over 95%' available | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Heads-up: wetter3.de additional model data available | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Another Belfort Digiwx Advisor "Current Data Not Available" | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
New free data charts available | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |