"Pete" wrote in message
T...
Realist wrote
This sure is par for the course for the cabal's propagandists.


Sounds like a big conspiracy by the Cabal! Why not thank L. Soloman and
tell Harper so he can use it to defend Canada's position on global
warming?

On the other hand, you could just be a "realist" and realize that most
anti-
AGW kooks like Soloman believe that anything that backs up the immense
scientific evidence supporting man made global warming is a lie, and hence
part of the great conspiracy he rants about in his National Post columns.




"immense scientific evidence"???

You mean like this??




Climate Data Tampering Warms The Planet!





Climate Data Tampering Warms Australia



http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/a...tralian_stats/





Climate Data Tampering Warms Darwin



http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/a...arwin_to_warm/





Climate Data Tampering Warms New Zealand



http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/a..._made_warming/





Climate Data Tampering Warms Russia



http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/a...also_man_made/





Climate Data Tampering Warms Alaska



http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/a...ime_in_alaska/





Climate Data Tampering Warms Sweden



http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/a...sweden_warmer/





Fraudulent Hockey Sticks And Hidden Data



http://joannenova.com.au/2009/12/fra...ata/#more-4660









Would You Buy A Used Car From These So-Called "Scientists"?



Our gullible alarmist friends have obviously fallen for this scam hook,
line, and sinker!



First we had the IPCC report "The Science of Climate Change 1995", where
lead auther Benjamin D. Santer removed the following conclusions made by
genuine scientists, and without the scientists being made aware of this
change.



"None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can
attribute the observed climate changes to the specific cause of increases in
greenhouse gases."



"No study to date has positively attributed all or part [of the climate
change observed to date] to anthropogenic [man-made] causes."



"Any claims of positive detection of significant climate change are likely
to remain controversial until uncertainties in the total natural variability
of the climate system are reduced."



Then we have some choice quotes from so-called "consensus scientists".



"The two MMs [Canadian skeptics Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick] have been
after the CRU station data for years. If they ever hear there is a Freedom
of Information Act now in the UK, I think I'll delete the file rather than
send to anyone."

Phil Jones email, Feb 2 2005



"I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report, Kevin and
I will keep them out somehow, even if we have to redefine what the
peer-review literature is!"

Phil Jones Director, The CRU

[cutting skeptical scientists out of an official UN report]



"The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment,
and it is a travesty that we can't .there should be even more warming... the
data are surely wrong".

Kevin Trenberth, Climatologist, US Centre for Atmospheric Research



"...If anything, I would like to see the climate change happen, so the
science could be proved right, regardless of the consequences. This isn't
being political, it is being selfish. "

Phil Jones Director, The CRU



"We have to get rid of the Mediæval Warm Period" Confided to geophysicist
David Deming by the IPCC, 1995

[Many believe that man to be Jonathan Overpeck, which Prof. Deming didn't
deny in an email response, who would later also serve as an IPCC lead
author.]



"We have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the data
available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it?"
Phil Jones Director, The CRU



"We have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements,
and make little mention of any doubts we might have." Professor Stephen
Schneider



"Humans need a common motivation ... either a real one or else one invented
for the purpose. ... In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages,
famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by
human intervention so the real enemy then, is humanity itself." Club of Rome
declaration



"It doesn't matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is
true.... You are what the media define you to be. Greenpeace became a myth
and fund generating machine." Paul Watson, Co-Founder Greenpeace, Forbes,
Nov. 1991



Now what conclusion would a rational and sceptical person come to?



Frederick Seitz, president emeritus of Rockefeller University and chairman
of the George C. Marshall Institute, summed it up nicely after seeing the
changes made to the IPCC report.



"In my more than 60 years as a member of the American scientific community,
including service as president of both the National Academy of Sciences and
the American Physical Society, I have never witnessed a more disturbing
corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC
report."





Warmest Regards



B0n oz



"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps
US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists
worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct
from natural variation."

Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville