On Dec 25, 10:30*am, RayLopez99 wrote:
On Dec 23, 9:26*pm, "
wrote:

• Sorry Ray
*Global warming is a myth and does not exist.

You can't prove that. *The models say otherwise. *The real debate is
the degree of GW--18 cm mean sea level rise over the next century
(revised up from 9 cm) is the latest best guess.

• The models have not been right even once.

On the other hand "Climate Change" is
functioning as it has for 5 million years or more

Different issue. *AGW is the issue here, not CC.

•*Global warming is a myth and does not exist.
You are dealing with me, not with fools like
Copycock, Cahill or Keating. Sleight of hand
does not confuse me.

—*—
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural phenomena

On Dec 25, 10:36*pm, "I M @ good guy" wrote:


Different issue. *AGW is the issue here, not CC.


* * * * Surprise to me that you are siding with
a model, is she blonde and skinny?

Many models exist, just like blondes, brunettes, redheads. They point
to some slight GW. The issue is how much. The Greens will have you
believe Manhattan will be underwater, but the truth is only a mean sea
level rise about the same as an erect member over the next 100 years.
Nothing to write home about. Wait and see is the watchword.

RL