Please see:

http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/200...D9CNSE2O0.html

Typically, large volcanos inject dust into the stratosphere, causing
climate cooling for a year or two. That signal should be detectable
in the published global temperature series, both surface and
satellite. We'll have the data in about a couple of years. Stay
tuned and see.

On Dec 23, 5:53*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
Please see:

http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/200...D9CNSE2O0.html

Typically, large volcanos inject dust into the stratosphere, causing
climate cooling for a year or two. *That signal should be detectable
in the published global temperature series, both surface and
satellite. *We'll have the data in about a couple of years. * *Stay
tuned and see.

Glad that you are coming around to the idea of geoengineering. Yes we
can beat global warming--using technology. Kuznets curve again Roger.

RL

On Dec 23, 3:09*pm, RayLopez99 wrote:
On Dec 23, 5:53*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:

Please see:

http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/200...D9CNSE2O0.html

Typically, large volcanos inject dust into the stratosphere, causing
climate cooling for a year or two. *That signal should be detectable
in the published global temperature series, both surface and
satellite. *We'll have the data in about a couple of years. * *Stay
tuned and see.

Glad that you are coming around to the idea of geoengineering. *Yes we
can beat global warming--using technology. *Kuznets curve again Roger.

(Gee whiz! What a moronic reply!)
No Ray! This isn't a pug for geo engineering.
No one can afford to create the equivalent of a
major volcano eruption several times a year.
Nor could human civilization live long in the
permanent global famine such a scheme
would create.



RL

On Dec 24, 11:23*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Dec 23, 3:09*pm, RayLopez99 wrote:

On Dec 23, 5:53*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:

Please see:

http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/200...D9CNSE2O0.html

Typically, large volcanos inject dust into the stratosphere, causing
climate cooling for a year or two. *That signal should be detectable
in the published global temperature series, both surface and
satellite. *We'll have the data in about a couple of years. * *Stay
tuned and see.

Glad that you are coming around to the idea of geoengineering. *Yes we
can beat global warming--using technology. *Kuznets curve again Roger..

(Gee whiz! *What a moronic reply!)
No Ray! *This isn't a pug for geo engineering.
No one can afford to create the equivalent of a
major volcano eruption several times a year.
Nor could human civilization live long in the
permanent global famine such a scheme
would create.





RL- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Roger is mentioning the volcano, so that he has something to blame the
future temperature decline on.

This will help to prolong the AGW scam for another couple of years.

Note that even with the temperatures declining, Roger (and other AGW
worshippers) will claim the AGW is invisibly accelerating even faster
than it was invisibly accelerating before.

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:53:44 -0800 (PST), Roger Coppock
wrote:

Please see:

http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/200...D9CNSE2O0.html

Typically, large volcanos inject dust into the stratosphere, causing
climate cooling for a year or two.


I sure hope not, it is too cold now.


That signal should be detectable
in the published global temperature series, both surface and
satellite. We'll have the data in about a couple of years. Stay
tuned and see.


Maybe not, if they shut down all the power
plants the TVs and computers won't work.

On Dec 23, 6:09*pm, RayLopez99 wrote:
On Dec 23, 5:53*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:

Please see:

http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/200...D9CNSE2O0.html

Typically, large volcanos inject dust into the stratosphere, causing
climate cooling for a year or two. *That signal should be detectable
in the published global temperature series, both surface and
satellite. *We'll have the data in about a couple of years. * *Stay
tuned and see.

Glad that you are coming around to the idea of geoengineering. *Yes we
can beat global warming--using technology. *Kuznets curve again Roger.

• Sorry Ray
Global warming is a myth and does not exist.
On the other hand "Climate Change" is
functioning as it has for 5 million years or more

On Dec 23, 6:23*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Dec 23, 3:09*pm, RayLopez99 wrote:

On Dec 23, 5:53*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:

Please see:

http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/200...D9CNSE2O0.html

Typically, large volcanos inject dust into the stratosphere, causing
climate cooling for a year or two. *That signal should be detectable
in the published global temperature series, both surface and
satellite. *We'll have the data in about a couple of years. * *Stay
tuned and see.

• As of yesterday there are 15 active volcanos globally.
3 that I know of are definitely affecting climate locally

Glad that you are coming around to the idea of geoengineering. *Yes we
can beat global warming--using technology. *Kuznets curve again Roger..

(Gee whiz! *What a moronic reply!)
•• Those who would call others, "moron"
need only look in a mirror to see a real one.

On Dec 23, 9:26*pm, "
wrote:

• Sorry Ray
*Global warming is a myth and does not exist.

You can't prove that. The models say otherwise. The real debate is
the degree of GW--18 cm mean sea level rise over the next century
(revised up from 9 cm) is the latest best guess.

On the other hand "Climate Change" is
functioning as it has for 5 million years or more

Different issue. AGW is the issue here, not CC.

RL

On Dec 24, 2:23*am, Peter Muehlbauer
wrote:

Note that even with the temperatures declining, Roger (and other AGW
worshippers) will claim the AGW is invisibly accelerating even faster
than it was invisibly accelerating before.

Simply a clutch at straws.

Right you are Peter. I'm surprised these AGW cultards don't accuse
you of being a Holocaust Denier too, just because you're a AGW
skeptic. As evidenced by the East Anglia email scandal, these guys
will smear anybody and stop at nothing to get their way.

RL

On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:30:27 -0800 (PST), RayLopez99
wrote:

On Dec 23, 9:26Â*pm, "
wrote:

• Sorry Ray
Â*Global warming is a myth and does not exist.

You can't prove that. The models say otherwise. The real debate is
the degree of GW--18 cm mean sea level rise over the next century
(revised up from 9 cm) is the latest best guess.

On the other hand "Climate Change" is
functioning as it has for 5 million years or more

Different issue. AGW is the issue here, not CC.

RL

Surprise to me that you are siding with
a model, is she blonde and skinny?