In the Northern Hemisphere, November tied for 5th warmest on the 130-
year NASA record.

In the real world,
outside the fossil fuel industry's spin and lies,
global mean surface temperatures continue to rise.

These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA,
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt
They represent the results of tens of millions of readings
taken at thousands of stations covering the lands of the Northern
Hemisphere over the last 130 years. Yes, the data are corrected
for the urban heat island effect.

The Mean November temperature over the last 130 years is 14.027 C.
The Variance is 0.19235.
The Standard Deviation is 0.4386.

Rxy 0.7061 Rxy^2 0.4986
TEMP = 13.486601 + (0.008253 * (YEAR-1879))
Degrees of Freedom = 128 F = 127.29857
Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately
0.99999999999999999999 (20 nines)
The mean temperature of the month of November in the year 2009,
is linearly projected to be 14.559,
yet it was 14.94. - This above the projection, so
the warming accelerates.
The sum of the absolute errors is 34.042479

Rank of the months of November
Year Temp C Anomaly Z score
2005 15.15 1.123 2.56
2004 15.08 1.053 2.40
2006 15.06 1.033 2.35
2001 15.03 1.003 2.29
2009 14.94 0.913 2.08 --
2007 14.94 0.913 2.08
2008 14.93 0.903 2.06
2002 14.90 0.873 1.99
2003 14.84 0.813 1.85
1998 14.69 0.663 1.51
1999 14.68 0.653 1.49
1995 14.68 0.653 1.49
1990 14.64 0.613 1.40
1997 14.63 0.603 1.37
MEAN 14.027 0.000 0.00
1898 13.45 -0.577 -1.32
1890 13.45 -0.577 -1.32
1882 13.45 -0.577 -1.32
1920 13.44 -0.587 -1.34
1912 13.44 -0.587 -1.34
1902 13.41 -0.617 -1.41
1907 13.40 -0.627 -1.43
1894 13.40 -0.627 -1.43
1887 13.40 -0.627 -1.43
1884 13.35 -0.677 -1.54
1883 13.33 -0.697 -1.59
1892 13.32 -0.707 -1.61
1891 13.30 -0.727 -1.66
1908 13.25 -0.777 -1.77
1880 13.10 -0.927 -2.11

The most recent 158 continuous months, or 13 years and 2 months,
on this NH.Ts.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980
data set norm of 14 C.
There are 1559 months of data on this data set:
-- 806 of them are at or above the norm.
-- 753 of them are below the norm.
This run of 158 months above the norm is the result of a warming
world. It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level
of confidence. A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or
meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years,
otherwise expect it to continue.

On Dec 25, 12:44*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
In the Northern Hemisphere, November tied for 5th warmest on the 130-
year NASA record.

In the real world,
outside the fossil fuel industry's spin and lies,
global mean surface temperatures continue to rise.

These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA,http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt
They represent the results of tens of millions of readings
taken at thousands of stations covering the lands of the Northern
Hemisphere over the last 130 years. *Yes, the data are corrected
for the urban heat island effect.

The Mean November temperature over the last 130 years is 14.027 C.
The Variance is 0.19235.
The Standard Deviation is 0.4386.

Rxy 0.7061 * Rxy^2 0.4986
TEMP = 13.486601 + (0.008253 * (YEAR-1879))
Degrees of Freedom = 128 * * * * F = 127.29857
Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately
0.99999999999999999999 (20 nines)
The mean temperature of the month of November in the year 2009,
is linearly projected to be 14.559,
* * * * * * * * *yet it was 14.94. - This above the projection, so
the warming accelerates.
The sum of the absolute errors is 34.042479

*Rank of the months of November
Year * Temp C * Anomaly * Z score
2005 * 15.15 * * 1.123 * * 2.56
2004 * 15.08 * * 1.053 * * 2.40
2006 * 15.06 * * 1.033 * * 2.35
2001 * 15.03 * * 1.003 * * 2.29
2009 * 14.94 * * 0.913 * * 2.08 --
2007 * 14.94 * * 0.913 * * 2.08
2008 * 14.93 * * 0.903 * * 2.06
2002 * 14.90 * * 0.873 * * 1.99
2003 * 14.84 * * 0.813 * * 1.85
1998 * 14.69 * * 0.663 * * 1.51
1999 * 14.68 * * 0.653 * * 1.49
1995 * 14.68 * * 0.653 * * 1.49
1990 * 14.64 * * 0.613 * * 1.40
1997 * 14.63 * * 0.603 * * 1.37
MEAN * 14.027 * *0.000 * * 0.00
1898 * 13.45 * *-0.577 * *-1.32
1890 * 13.45 * *-0.577 * *-1.32
1882 * 13.45 * *-0.577 * *-1.32
1920 * 13.44 * *-0.587 * *-1.34
1912 * 13.44 * *-0.587 * *-1.34
1902 * 13.41 * *-0.617 * *-1.41
1907 * 13.40 * *-0.627 * *-1.43
1894 * 13.40 * *-0.627 * *-1.43
1887 * 13.40 * *-0.627 * *-1.43
1884 * 13.35 * *-0.677 * *-1.54
1883 * 13.33 * *-0.697 * *-1.59
1892 * 13.32 * *-0.707 * *-1.61
1891 * 13.30 * *-0.727 * *-1.66
1908 * 13.25 * *-0.777 * *-1.77
1880 * 13.10 * *-0.927 * *-2.11

The most recent 158 continuous months, or 13 years and 2 months,
on this NH.Ts.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980
data set norm of 14 C.
There are 1559 months of data on this data set:
* -- 806 of them are at or above the norm.
* -- 753 of them are below the norm.
This run of 158 months above the norm is the result of a warming
world. *It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level
of confidence. *A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or
meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years,
otherwise expect it to continue.

Sorry, no one trusts this data anymore. We know the warmists have
cooked it.

Houston wakes up to earliest snowfall ever

Accumulation sets record in city’s history; more flurries, worries forecast

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34274883

On Dec 25, 12:44*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:

OLD NEWS ROGER.

We're in record COLD setting December now.

Get over it, Mr. 99.999999...% (sixty nines).

RL

On Dec 25, 10:09*am, Monkey Clumps wrote:
On Dec 25, 12:44*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:





In the Northern Hemisphere, November tied for 5th warmest on the 130-
year NASA record.

In the real world,
outside the fossil fuel industry's spin and lies,
global mean surface temperatures continue to rise.

These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA,http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt
They represent the results of tens of millions of readings
taken at thousands of stations covering the lands of the Northern
Hemisphere over the last 130 years. *Yes, the data are corrected
for the urban heat island effect.

The Mean November temperature over the last 130 years is 14.027 C.
The Variance is 0.19235.
The Standard Deviation is 0.4386.

Rxy 0.7061 * Rxy^2 0.4986
TEMP = 13.486601 + (0.008253 * (YEAR-1879))
Degrees of Freedom = 128 * * * * F = 127.29857
Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately
0.99999999999999999999 (20 nines)
The mean temperature of the month of November in the year 2009,
is linearly projected to be 14.559,
* * * * * * * * *yet it was 14.94. - This above the projection, so
the warming accelerates.
The sum of the absolute errors is 34.042479

*Rank of the months of November
Year * Temp C * Anomaly * Z score
2005 * 15.15 * * 1.123 * * 2.56
2004 * 15.08 * * 1.053 * * 2.40
2006 * 15.06 * * 1.033 * * 2.35
2001 * 15.03 * * 1.003 * * 2.29
2009 * 14.94 * * 0.913 * * 2.08 --
2007 * 14.94 * * 0.913 * * 2.08
2008 * 14.93 * * 0.903 * * 2.06
2002 * 14.90 * * 0.873 * * 1.99
2003 * 14.84 * * 0.813 * * 1.85
1998 * 14.69 * * 0.663 * * 1.51
1999 * 14.68 * * 0.653 * * 1.49
1995 * 14.68 * * 0.653 * * 1.49
1990 * 14.64 * * 0.613 * * 1.40
1997 * 14.63 * * 0.603 * * 1.37
MEAN * 14.027 * *0.000 * * 0.00
1898 * 13.45 * *-0.577 * *-1.32
1890 * 13.45 * *-0.577 * *-1.32
1882 * 13.45 * *-0.577 * *-1.32
1920 * 13.44 * *-0.587 * *-1.34
1912 * 13.44 * *-0.587 * *-1.34
1902 * 13.41 * *-0.617 * *-1.41
1907 * 13.40 * *-0.627 * *-1.43
1894 * 13.40 * *-0.627 * *-1.43
1887 * 13.40 * *-0.627 * *-1.43
1884 * 13.35 * *-0.677 * *-1.54
1883 * 13.33 * *-0.697 * *-1.59
1892 * 13.32 * *-0.707 * *-1.61
1891 * 13.30 * *-0.727 * *-1.66
1908 * 13.25 * *-0.777 * *-1.77
1880 * 13.10 * *-0.927 * *-2.11

The most recent 158 continuous months, or 13 years and 2 months,
on this NH.Ts.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980
data set norm of 14 C.
There are 1559 months of data on this data set:
* -- 806 of them are at or above the norm.
* -- 753 of them are below the norm.
This run of 158 months above the norm is the result of a warming
world. *It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level
of confidence. *A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or
meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years,
otherwise expect it to continue.

Sorry, no one trusts this data anymore. *We know the warmists have
cooked it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Like people like you wouldn't cook data BULL****

On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:17:56 +0000, Blue wrote:





Houston wakes up to earliest snowfall ever

Accumulation sets record in city’s history; more flurries, worries forecast

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34274883

Any temp 32 degrees or below can produce lasting snow.
The earliest fall/winter below freezing low temp in Houston (28 F)
occurred on Nov 3 in 1973..

On Dec 25, 5:44*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
In the Northern Hemisphere, November tied for 5th warmest on the 130-
year NASA record.

In the real world,
outside the fossil fuel industry's spin and lies,
global mean surface temperatures continue to rise.

These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA,http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt
They represent the results of tens of millions of readings
taken at thousands of stations covering the lands of the Northern
Hemisphere over the last 130 years. *Yes, the data are corrected
for the urban heat island effect.

The Mean November temperature over the last 130 years is 14.027 C.
The Variance is 0.19235.
The Standard Deviation is 0.4386.

Rxy 0.7061 * Rxy^2 0.4986
TEMP = 13.486601 + (0.008253 * (YEAR-1879))
Degrees of Freedom = 128 * * * * F = 127.29857
Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately
0.99999999999999999999 (20 nines)
The mean temperature of the month of November in the year 2009,
is linearly projected to be 14.559,
* * * * * * * * *yet it was 14.94. - This above the projection, so
the warming accelerates.
The sum of the absolute errors is 34.042479

*Rank of the months of November
Year * Temp C * Anomaly * Z score
2005 * 15.15 * * 1.123 * * 2.56
2004 * 15.08 * * 1.053 * * 2.40
2006 * 15.06 * * 1.033 * * 2.35
2001 * 15.03 * * 1.003 * * 2.29
2009 * 14.94 * * 0.913 * * 2.08 --
2007 * 14.94 * * 0.913 * * 2.08
2008 * 14.93 * * 0.903 * * 2.06
2002 * 14.90 * * 0.873 * * 1.99
2003 * 14.84 * * 0.813 * * 1.85
1998 * 14.69 * * 0.663 * * 1.51
1999 * 14.68 * * 0.653 * * 1.49
1995 * 14.68 * * 0.653 * * 1.49
1990 * 14.64 * * 0.613 * * 1.40
1997 * 14.63 * * 0.603 * * 1.37
MEAN * 14.027 * *0.000 * * 0.00
1898 * 13.45 * *-0.577 * *-1.32
1890 * 13.45 * *-0.577 * *-1.32
1882 * 13.45 * *-0.577 * *-1.32
1920 * 13.44 * *-0.587 * *-1.34
1912 * 13.44 * *-0.587 * *-1.34
1902 * 13.41 * *-0.617 * *-1.41
1907 * 13.40 * *-0.627 * *-1.43
1894 * 13.40 * *-0.627 * *-1.43
1887 * 13.40 * *-0.627 * *-1.43
1884 * 13.35 * *-0.677 * *-1.54
1883 * 13.33 * *-0.697 * *-1.59
1892 * 13.32 * *-0.707 * *-1.61
1891 * 13.30 * *-0.727 * *-1.66
1908 * 13.25 * *-0.777 * *-1.77
1880 * 13.10 * *-0.927 * *-2.11

The most recent 158 continuous months, or 13 years and 2 months,
on this NH.Ts.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980
data set norm of 14 C.
There are 1559 months of data on this data set:
* -- 806 of them are at or above the norm.
* -- 753 of them are below the norm.
This run of 158 months above the norm is the result of a warming
world. *It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level
of confidence. *A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or
meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years,
otherwise expect it to continue.


At least 18 people have died as a result of blizzards and freezing
temperatures enveloping the US Midwest.
A state of emergency has been declared in South Dakota, Texas and
Oklahoma, where the authorities have shut down highways after a series
of accidents.
Thousands of people in Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa and Illinois
were also reported to have lost power to their homes.
"The storm is spanning two thirds of the country," said Chris Vaccaro,
a spokesman for the National Weather Service.

How cold does it have to get until you Americans pillory your
politicians on claiming the world is getting warmer?

On Dec 25, 5:44*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
In the Northern Hemisphere, November tied for 5th warmest on the 130-
year NASA record.

In the real world,
outside the fossil fuel industry's spin and lies,
global mean surface temperatures continue to rise.

These hemispherically averaged temperature data come from NASA,http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/NH.Ts.txt
They represent the results of tens of millions of readings
taken at thousands of stations covering the lands of the Northern
Hemisphere over the last 130 years. *Yes, the data are corrected
for the urban heat island effect.

The Mean November temperature over the last 130 years is 14.027 C.
The Variance is 0.19235.
The Standard Deviation is 0.4386.

Rxy 0.7061 * Rxy^2 0.4986
TEMP = 13.486601 + (0.008253 * (YEAR-1879))
Degrees of Freedom = 128 * * * * F = 127.29857
Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately
0.99999999999999999999 (20 nines)
The mean temperature of the month of November in the year 2009,
is linearly projected to be 14.559,
* * * * * * * * *yet it was 14.94. - This above the projection, so
the warming accelerates.
The sum of the absolute errors is 34.042479

*Rank of the months of November
Year * Temp C * Anomaly * Z score
2005 * 15.15 * * 1.123 * * 2.56
2004 * 15.08 * * 1.053 * * 2.40
2006 * 15.06 * * 1.033 * * 2.35
2001 * 15.03 * * 1.003 * * 2.29
2009 * 14.94 * * 0.913 * * 2.08 --
2007 * 14.94 * * 0.913 * * 2.08
2008 * 14.93 * * 0.903 * * 2.06
2002 * 14.90 * * 0.873 * * 1.99
2003 * 14.84 * * 0.813 * * 1.85
1998 * 14.69 * * 0.663 * * 1.51
1999 * 14.68 * * 0.653 * * 1.49
1995 * 14.68 * * 0.653 * * 1.49
1990 * 14.64 * * 0.613 * * 1.40
1997 * 14.63 * * 0.603 * * 1.37
MEAN * 14.027 * *0.000 * * 0.00
1898 * 13.45 * *-0.577 * *-1.32
1890 * 13.45 * *-0.577 * *-1.32
1882 * 13.45 * *-0.577 * *-1.32
1920 * 13.44 * *-0.587 * *-1.34
1912 * 13.44 * *-0.587 * *-1.34
1902 * 13.41 * *-0.617 * *-1.41
1907 * 13.40 * *-0.627 * *-1.43
1894 * 13.40 * *-0.627 * *-1.43
1887 * 13.40 * *-0.627 * *-1.43
1884 * 13.35 * *-0.677 * *-1.54
1883 * 13.33 * *-0.697 * *-1.59
1892 * 13.32 * *-0.707 * *-1.61
1891 * 13.30 * *-0.727 * *-1.66
1908 * 13.25 * *-0.777 * *-1.77
1880 * 13.10 * *-0.927 * *-2.11

The most recent 158 continuous months, or 13 years and 2 months,
on this NH.Ts.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980
data set norm of 14 C.
There are 1559 months of data on this data set:
* -- 806 of them are at or above the norm.
* -- 753 of them are below the norm.
This run of 158 months above the norm is the result of a warming
world. *It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level
of confidence. *A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or
meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years,
otherwise expect it to continue.

Yep but where is the Medieval Warm Period in this data? Also your
figures show a drop of 0.48°C in the last 4 years. So in 20 years time
it could be 2.5°C cooler than now.

On Dec 25, 4:06*pm, richp wrote:
On Dec 25, 10:09*am, Monkey Clumps wrote:

Sorry, no one trusts this data anymore. *We know the warmists have
cooked it.
Like people like you wouldn't cook data BULL****

# Poor poor ****y pants, at a loss for words to say, so he
has to spam. Not so long ago, ISPs would not accept a
one line response to 200+ line quoted. The rules
haven't changed but the providers find it expensive to
to enforce, and the data bases have expanded
exponentially .

—*—
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural phenomena

On Dec 25, 3:04*pm, "
wrote:
On Dec 25, 4:06*pm, richp wrote:

On Dec 25, 10:09*am, Monkey Clumps wrote:
Sorry, no one trusts this data anymore. *We know the warmists have
cooked it.
Like people like you wouldn't cook data BULL****

# Poor poor ****y pants, at a loss for words to say, so he
* * has to spam. Not so long ago, ISPs would not accept a
* * one line response to 200+ line quoted. The rules
* * haven't changed but the providers find it expensive to
* * to enforce, and the data bases have expanded
* * exponentially .

* * —*—
*| In real science the burden of proof is always
*| on the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
*| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
*| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
*| they provided data that climate change is being
*| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
*| natural phenomena

Bull**** is your first name