sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 29th 09, 12:13 AM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,soc.religion.quaker
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2009
Posts: 64
Default The global warming debate has gotten to an absurd level

CO2 could have an Even Greater Impact on Global Temperatures
http://global-warming.accuweather.co...greater_1.html

"In the meantime.......this was the opening paragraph from Joe
*******i's blog on AccuWeather.com Premium from Friday..........

What is facing the major population centers of the northern hemisphere
is unlike anything that we have seen since the global warming debate
got to the absurd level it is now, which essentially has been there is
no doubt about all this. For cold of a variety not seen in over 25
years in a large scale is about to engulf the major energy consuming
areas of the northern Hemisphere. The first 15 days of the opening of
the New Year will be the coldest, population weighted, north of 30
north world wide in over 25 years in my opinion."

So, as a professional meteorologist I heartily
agree with Joe *******i.

Peace (after the Quaker fashion),
David Christainsen
Newton, Mass. USA


  #2   Report Post  
Old December 29th 09, 12:27 AM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,soc.religion.quaker
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2009
Posts: 36
Default The global warming debate has gotten to an absurd level

On Dec 28, 7:13*pm, Carl lied through his
tooth:
So, as a professional meteorologist


You're not a professional meteorologist. You're a pathetic troll.
Sucks to be you.
  #3   Report Post  
Old December 29th 09, 12:37 AM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,soc.religion.quaker
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2009
Posts: 64
Default The global warming debate has gotten to an absurd level

On Dec 28, 7:27*pm, Sir David wrote:
On Dec 28, 7:13*pm, Carl lied through his
tooth:

So, as a professional meteorologist


You're not a professional meteorologist. You're a pathetic troll.
Sucks to be you.


Where have your good manners gone?

Peace (after the Quaker fashion),
David Christainsen - Meteorologist
Newton, Mass. USA
  #4   Report Post  
Old December 29th 09, 01:49 AM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,soc.religion.quaker
( ( is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2009
Posts: 17
Default The global warming debate has gotten to an absurd level

On Dec 28, 4:13*pm, crunch wrote:

So, as a professional meteorologist


With my wireless weather station and accompanying software to download
the info on my computer, I'm more of a "professional meteorologist"
than you are or ever have been.

  #5   Report Post  
Old December 29th 09, 03:22 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,soc.religion.quaker
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2009
Posts: 64
Default The global warming debate has gotten to an absurd level

On Dec 28, 8:49*pm, "(Kelly)" wrote:
On Dec 28, 4:13*pm, crunch wrote:

So, as a professional meteorologist


With my wireless weather station and accompanying software to download
the info on my computer, I'm more of a "professional meteorologist"
than you are or ever have been.


What an outpouring of bunk here from Kelly!

Peace (after the Quaker fashion),
David Christainsen - Meteorologist
Newton, Mass. USA


  #6   Report Post  
Old December 29th 09, 03:38 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,soc.religion.quaker
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Nov 2008
Posts: 30
Default The global warming debate has gotten to an absurd level

crunch wrote:
On Dec 28, 8:49 pm, "(Kelly)" wrote:
On Dec 28, 4:13 pm, crunch wrote:

So, as a professional meteorologist

With my wireless weather station and accompanying software to download
the info on my computer, I'm more of a "professional meteorologist"
than you are or ever have been.


What an outpouring of bunk here from Kelly!


This is a good opportunity to ask you what your meteorology setup
is. What do you use to study and predict your local weather?


--
Tom "Go Pack" McDonald
  #7   Report Post  
Old December 29th 09, 04:54 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,soc.religion.quaker
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2009
Posts: 64
Default The global warming debate has gotten to an absurd level

On Dec 29, 10:38*am, Tom McDonald wrote:
crunch wrote:
On Dec 28, 8:49 pm, "(Kelly)" wrote:
On Dec 28, 4:13 pm, crunch wrote:


So, as a professional meteorologist
With my wireless weather station and accompanying software to download
the info on my computer, I'm more of a "professional meteorologist"
than you are or ever have been.


What an outpouring of bunk here from Kelly!


This is a good opportunity to ask you what your meteorology setup
is. What do you use to study and predict your local weather?

--
Tom "Go Pack" McDonald


Why do you ask? I did not know you were green.

Peace (after the Quaker fashion),
David "Simple and Uncompromising" Christainsen - Meteorologist
Newton, Mass. USA
  #8   Report Post  
Old December 29th 09, 05:48 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,soc.religion.quaker
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2009
Posts: 36
Default The global warming debate has gotten to an absurd level

On Dec 29, 11:54*am, Carl ducked a simple
question:
On Dec 29, 10:38*am, Tom McDonald wrote:
What do you use to study and predict your local weather?

Why do you ask? *I did not know you were green.


Carl refuses to answer a simple question (keeping his perfect record),
and follows it with a non-sequitur. He's just a meaty urologist at the
firm of Duck, Dodge, and Hyde. Who can't answer a simple questions,
but sure can kookdance!



  #9   Report Post  
Old December 29th 09, 07:23 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,soc.religion.quaker
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2009
Posts: 1
Default The global warming debate has gotten to an absurd level

On Dec 29, 10:54*am, crunch wrote:
On Dec 29, 10:38*am, Tom McDonald wrote:



crunch wrote:
On Dec 28, 8:49 pm, "(Kelly)" wrote:
On Dec 28, 4:13 pm, crunch wrote:


So, as a professional meteorologist
With my wireless weather station and accompanying software to download
the info on my computer, I'm more of a "professional meteorologist"
than you are or ever have been.


What an outpouring of bunk here from Kelly!


This is a good opportunity to ask you what your meteorology setup
is. What do you use to study and predict your local weather?


--
Tom "Go Pack" McDonald


Why do you ask? *I did not know you were green.


I ask because I am curious. I am interested in what tools you use to
study and predict the weather.

As a kid, I looked at the weather gear (hygrometers, wind speed and
direction indicators, barometers, etc.) with longing, but couldn't
afford any of it. Now I might be able to scrape up a bit of cash for
some weather stuff; but I would like some idea of what folks are using
these days.

That's why I ask.
  #10   Report Post  
Old December 29th 09, 09:38 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,soc.religion.quaker
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2009
Posts: 5
Default The global warming debate has gotten to an absurd level

In article ,
Sir David wrote:
On Dec 29, 11:54*am, Carl ducked a simple
question:
On Dec 29, 10:38*am, Tom McDonald wrote:
What do you use to study and predict your local weather?

Why do you ask? *I did not know you were green.


Carl refuses to answer a simple question (keeping his perfect record),
and follows it with a non-sequitur. He's just a meaty urologist at the
firm of Duck, Dodge, and Hyde. Who can't answer a simple questions,
but sure can kookdance!




I think the question was asked of Kelly. If so David is just shoving an
oar in gratuitously, Ian.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Damn Julia Slingo 'absurd', says Nigel Lawson Jim Cannon uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 70 February 16th 14 01:25 PM
absurd conversions again Jack ([email protected]) uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 10 December 26th 07 07:52 PM
Mathematical incompetence (was absurd conversions) Jack ([email protected]) uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 8 December 25th 07 06:07 PM
Has Florida gotten the hint? Stephen Stein ne.weather.moderated (US North East Weather) 3 September 24th 04 02:27 AM
'Earthshine' fall heats global warming debate Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 3 June 3rd 04 11:47 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017