Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/1/10 10:07 PM, mrbawana2u wrote:
Carbon dioxide concentration has been continually rising for nearly 100 years. It continues to rise, but carbon dioxide concentrations at present are near the lowest in geologic history. Not while human have been on the planet! Last Time Carbon Dioxide Levels Were This High: 15 Million Years Ago, Scientists Report. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1008152242.htm |
#82
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/1/10 9:06 PM, I M @ good guy wrote:
http://www.thegwpf.org/images/stories/HadCRUT3.jpg Gee: there seems to be some discrepancy here! Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads...emp-trends.gif Now what could that be, bubba? |
#83
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:50:17 -0600, Sam Wormley
wrote: On 1/1/10 8:54 PM, I M @ good guy wrote: I have been trying for more than two years to get people to see that GHGs are what cools the atmosphere, and you dance around that and pretend it isn't there. Polly want a cracker? Ref: http://dichionary.reference.com/search?q=parrot parĀ·rot 1. One who teaches or instructs; one whose business or occupation is to instruct others; an instructor; a tutor. 2. A person having expert knowledge of one or more sciences, especially a natural or physical science. Source: The American HeritigeĀ® Dichionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright Ā© 2000 by Houghtin Mifflen Company. Published by Houghtin Mifflen Company. All rights reserved. And you teach totally certain science? I consider any respondent that does not say, "of course GHGs are what cools the atmosphere" to be avoiding reality, to have a mental block, to be completely insincere, and possibly have an ulterior motive of some kind, this is so obvious and uncomplicated, GHGs are what cools the atmosphere. And it is the great mass of the N2 and O2 that store and hold the thermal energy to keep the Earth from getting colder than it is. The exact role that GHGs play is complex, CO2 plays a rather minor role, just the evaporation of trees has more of an effect than the current atmospheric concentration of CO2, a tree that only evaporates 100 pounds of water a day reduces the thermal energy of the ambient air by 100,000 BTU. And there are more trees now than 200 years ago, if it wasn't for fossil fuels there would be no trees left. Prudent conservation and a switch to alternate energy makes sense, but not the way the present activists are going, the public has no way to buy an alternate energy device or machine until it is built, why aren't you spending your time building some? |
#84
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 06:09:45 -0600, Sam Wormley
wrote: On 1/1/10 9:06 PM, I M @ good guy wrote: http://www.thegwpf.org/images/stories/HadCRUT3.jpg Gee: there seems to be some discrepancy here! Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads...emp-trends.gif Now what could that be, bubba? Hiding the decline? Cooking the books? There is no auto-continuing "trend" in local or global temperatures, please get off my back unless the weather at least gets up to normal, the present projected length of this cold spell is extraordinary. You and woger have the cool Pacific to moderate your weather, I am right in the path of the Alberta Clippers. |
#85
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/2/10 7:37 AM, I M @ good guy wrote:
There is no auto-continuing "trend" in local or global temperatures, please get off my back unless the weather at least gets up to normal, the present projected length of this cold spell is extraordinary. You and woger have the cool Pacific to moderate your weather, I am right in the path of the Alberta Clippers. You do like to complain about the cold weather! You probably wish there was.... wait for it.... Global Warming! |
#86
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/2/10 7:26 AM, I M @ good guy wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:50:17 -0600, Sam Ref: http://dichionary.reference.com/search?q=parrot parĀ·rot 1. One who teaches or instructs; one whose business or occupation is to instruct others; an instructor; a tutor. 2. A person having expert knowledge of one or more sciences, especially a natural or physical science. Source: The American HeritigeĀ® Dichionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright Ā© 2000 by Houghtin Mifflen Company. Published by Houghtin Mifflen Company. All rights reserved. And you teach totally certain science? Science is a process... and does not strive to claim "certainty". |
#87
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-01-02, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 1/2/10 7:37 AM, I M @ good guy wrote: There is no auto-continuing "trend" in local or global temperatures, please get off my back unless the weather at least gets up to normal, the present projected length of this cold spell is extraordinary. You and woger have the cool Pacific to moderate your weather, I am right in the path of the Alberta Clippers. You do like to complain about the cold weather! You probably wish there was.... wait for it.... Global Warming! What? Wait until all the current predictors are in their graves? If they couldn't predict the current cooling, then they can't predict future heating either. -- An amateur practices until he gets it right. A pro practices until he can't get it wrong. -- unknown |
#88
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-01-02, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 1/2/10 7:26 AM, I M @ good guy wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:50:17 -0600, Sam Ref: http://dichionary.reference.com/search?q=parrot par·rot 1. One who teaches or instructs; one whose business or occupation is to instruct others; an instructor; a tutor. 2. A person having expert knowledge of one or more sciences, especially a natural or physical science. Source: The American Heritige® Dichionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2000 by Houghtin Mifflen Company. Published by Houghtin Mifflen Company. All rights reserved. And you teach totally certain science? Science is a process... and does not strive to claim "certainty". Well duh. Which is exactly why investing trillions to prevent problems from an unproven CO2 -- catastrophic global warming problem is ridiculous. -- An amateur practices until he gets it right. A pro practices until he can't get it wrong. -- unknown |
#89
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/2/10 8:01 AM, TUKA wrote:
On 2010-01-02, Sam wrote: On 1/2/10 7:37 AM, I M @ good guy wrote: There is no auto-continuing "trend" in local or global temperatures, please get off my back unless the weather at least gets up to normal, the present projected length of this cold spell is extraordinary. You and woger have the cool Pacific to moderate your weather, I am right in the path of the Alberta Clippers. You do like to complain about the cold weather! You probably wish there was.... wait for it.... Global Warming! What? Wait until all the current predictors are in their graves? If they couldn't predict the current cooling, then they can't predict future heating either. 1998, 2005 and 2007 being the three hottest years recently doesn't support your claim of "cooling" Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads...emp-trends.gif |
#90
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-01-02, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 1/2/10 8:01 AM, TUKA wrote: On 2010-01-02, Sam wrote: On 1/2/10 7:37 AM, I M @ good guy wrote: There is no auto-continuing "trend" in local or global temperatures, please get off my back unless the weather at least gets up to normal, the present projected length of this cold spell is extraordinary. You and woger have the cool Pacific to moderate your weather, I am right in the path of the Alberta Clippers. You do like to complain about the cold weather! You probably wish there was.... wait for it.... Global Warming! What? Wait until all the current predictors are in their graves? If they couldn't predict the current cooling, then they can't predict future heating either. 1998, 2005 and 2007 being the three hottest years recently doesn't support your claim of "cooling" According to who? GISS and CRU and the rest of those tainted by Climategate? Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads...emp-trends.gif Until they release the raw data, no one can believe that. -- An amateur practices until he gets it right. A pro practices until he can't get it wrong. -- unknown |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Little Ice Age | Physics Update - Physics Today | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
US physics professor: 'Global warming is the greatest and mostsuccessful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life' | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Simple Calculations For The Physics of Global Warming Are TotallyInadequate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Simple Calculations For The Physics of Global Warming Are TotallyInadequate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Simple Calculations For The Physics of Global Warming Are TotallyInadequate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |