On 12/27/09 11:21 PM, Bill Ward wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:59:51 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase
http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads...emp-trends.gif

That graph ends in 2005.



Bill--Don't read this article... It's just alarmist bull****,
right?

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/h...ow/5406955.cms

On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 09:51:56 -0600, Sam Wormley
wrote:

On 12/27/09 11:21 PM, Bill Ward wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:59:51 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase
http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads...emp-trends.gif

That graph ends in 2005.



Bill--Don't read this article... It's just alarmist bull****,
right?

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/h...ow/5406955.cms


The statement that CO2 is the main GHG
"warming the atmosphere" is the dumbest
thing ever written, simply because GHGs
cool the atmosphere, and water is a far
better GHG, and water exists in concentrations
many times more than CO2.

And you have a degree in physics?

On 1/3/10 10:19 AM, I M @ good guy wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 09:51:56 -0600, Sam
wrote:

On 12/27/09 11:21 PM, Bill Ward wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:59:51 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase
http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads...emp-trends.gif

That graph ends in 2005.



Bill--Don't read this article... It's just alarmist bull****,
right?

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/h...ow/5406955.cms


The statement that CO2 is the main GHG
"warming the atmosphere" is the dumbest
thing ever written, simply because GHGs
cool the atmosphere, and water is a far
better GHG, and water exists in concentrations
many times more than CO2.

And you have a degree in physics?


Most are not in agreement with you, as the data indicate that
CO2 is the major driver in this instance.

On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 10:24:18 -0600, Sam Wormley
wrote:

On 1/3/10 10:19 AM, I M @ good guy wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 09:51:56 -0600, Sam
wrote:

On 12/27/09 11:21 PM, Bill Ward wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:59:51 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase
http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads...emp-trends.gif

That graph ends in 2005.



Bill--Don't read this article... It's just alarmist bull****,
right?

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/h...ow/5406955.cms


The statement that CO2 is the main GHG
"warming the atmosphere" is the dumbest
thing ever written, simply because GHGs
cool the atmosphere, and water is a far
better GHG, and water exists in concentrations
many times more than CO2.

And you have a degree in physics?


Most are not in agreement with you,

Can't you be more specific, just what could
they possibly disagree with, certainly not the
obvious FACT that Infra-Red radiation by GHGs
is what cools the atmosphere?

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.g...5b2e42f08493ad

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.g...44de81066bb738

Did you forget what GHGs do? "Radiate" ! "Radiate
Infra-Red" ! Radiate energy to space. What cools the atmosphere,
answer: the same thing that cools the surface, IR radiation to space,
and what radiates Infra-Red that are gases in the atmosphere?

Look at everything from both sides, consider every
possibility, neglecting possible advances in understanding
holds back progress.

as the data indicate that
CO2 is the major driver in this instance.

Doing what? Cooling the atmosphere?
Do you realize it would be blasphemy in the
church of Anthropogenic Global Warming if
you said CO2 cools the atmosphere?

Ok, I searched gagale and bingo, and
found almost nothing on the science of
Infra-Red radiation to space by GreenHouse
Gases, so I am ready to admit, I am the only
person on Earth that understands that GHGs
do 99 percent of the cooling of the atmosphere,
and LWIR from the surface cools the part of the
surface that is not cooled by water evaporating,
and wind and convection.

What sorry sack the climate industry is,
unable to simply provide the basic mechanism
that cools the atmosphere.

Obviously outhouse rumors, gossip, and
parroting of literature has replaced science
in the climate industry.

I repeat, I challenge anybody to proffer
any process or mechanism that cools the
atmosphere as it is warmed by the sun,
radiation from and contact with the surface.