Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We've all heard the Green claims of increasing extinctions. Turns out to bull**** too.
EO Wilson's claim that 27,000 extinctions per year are happening is actually 16X too high. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/0...e-the-corpses/ 4 01 2010 Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach Abstract The record of continental (as opposed to island) bird and mammal extinctions in the last five centuries was analyzed to determine if the "species-area" relationship actually works to predict extinctions. Very few continental birds or mammals are recorded as having gone extinct, and none have gone extinct from habitat reduction alone. No continental forest bird or mammal is recorded as having gone extinct from any cause. Since the species-area relationship predicts that there should have been a very large number of recorded bird and mammal extinctions from habitat reduction over the last half millennium, I show that the species-area relationship gives erroneous answers to the question of extinction rates |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Eric Gisin" wrote: We've all heard the Green claims of increasing extinctions. Turns out to bull**** too. EO Wilson's claim that 27,000 extinctions per year are happening is actually 16X too high. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/0...e-the-corpses/ 4 01 2010 Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach Abstract The record of continental (as opposed to island) bird and mammal extinctions in the last five centuries was analyzed to determine if the "species-area" relationship actually works to predict extinctions. Very few continental birds or mammals are recorded as having gone extinct, and none have gone extinct from habitat reduction alone. No continental forest bird or mammal is recorded as having gone extinct from any cause. Since the species-area relationship predicts that there should have been a very large number of recorded bird and mammal extinctions from habitat reduction over the last half millennium, I show that the species-area relationship gives erroneous answers to the question of extinction rates Just you wait till the humans go. You Tube; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBDgSsCxik8 a world w/o humans or governments -- Hint; Enjoy the moment ! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Gisin wrote:
We've all heard the Green claims of increasing extinctions. Turns out to bull**** too. EO Wilson's claim that 27,000 extinctions per year are happening is actually 16X too high. So, you DO admit extinctions are increasing. lol |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|