sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 6th 10, 07:08 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology,sci.skeptic
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2010
Posts: 2
Default $2,400,000,000,000 Damage! Just from melting the Arctic


"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
Pew Study Says Arctic Ice Melt to Cost Global Economy $2.4 Trillion

Please see:

snip

Well, I read all the links and nowhere is there a speck of proof of AGW,
just assumptions. Sorry, I feel bad for you and your crusade but it's over
and the fat lady has sung.


  #2   Report Post  
Old February 6th 10, 07:55 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology,sci.skeptic
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: May 2005
Posts: 1,360
Default $2,400,000,000,000 Damage! Just from melting the Arctic

On Feb 6, 11:08*am, "Buerste" wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message

... Pew Study Says Arctic Ice Melt to Cost Global Economy $2.4 Trillion

Please see:


snip

Well, I read all the links and nowhere is there a speck of proof of AGW,


My post was at 10:51 your non-reply was at 11:08.
You could not possibly have read the three links in 17 minutes.

just assumptions. *Sorry, I feel bad for you and your crusade but it's over
and the fat lady has sung.


  #3   Report Post  
Old February 7th 10, 01:35 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology,sci.skeptic
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2010
Posts: 2
Default $2,400,000,000,000 Damage! Just from melting the Arctic


"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
On Feb 6, 11:08 am, "Buerste" wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message

...
Pew Study Says Arctic Ice Melt to Cost Global Economy $2.4 Trillion

Please see:


snip

Well, I read all the links and nowhere is there a speck of proof of AGW,


My post was at 10:51 your non-reply was at 11:08.
You could not possibly have read the three links in 17 minutes.

just assumptions. Sorry, I feel bad for you and your crusade but it's over
and the fat lady has sung.


Gee Roger, that's a pitiful reply. But, I understand that you are EXTREMELY
desperate....and I don't mean this post but you whole world has proven to be
the hoax and scam we said it was all along. I really DO feel sorry for
you, I know you were heavily vested.

So, how your rocketry coming? Anything new and fun?



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[OT] CO2 does pass 400 ppm Alastair McDonald[_2_] uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 6 May 27th 13 08:08 PM
Warmest Summer in 400 yrs: NASA Rich sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 1 October 25th 05 04:54 PM
Warmest Summer in 400 yrs: NASA Rich sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 3 October 7th 05 11:28 AM
Warmest Summer in 400 yrs: NASA [email protected] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 October 3rd 05 06:23 PM
[WR] 400 mm up in Bracknell martin rowley uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 4 November 10th 03 09:33 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017