Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"enigma" wrote in message
... More blogs, More weather reports, more opinions,, "It's All Global cooling To These Frauds " You mean the CRU is now simply a blog or an opinion? Fact is in 2000 after several mild winters they stated that snow falls for winters are becoming a thing of the past. So, please explain to everyone here why they would make such a claim based on an weather report? The last time I looked the CRU is not supposed to be engaged in propaganda. The last time I looked the CRU was not simply an blog. In 2000, to quote the CRU: quote March 2000 we got the headline: "Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past". According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting event /quote in 2009-2010: Snow and ice hit Britain. CRU is now under investigation, and politicians are asking why they got their predictions of mild winters so wrong? In other words if the world's foremost climate institution is making wild and stupid predictions about ONE mild winter, then you must be standing here and complaining about your ivory towers of weather prediction that were so incredibly wrong. In other words, what you speak of is not scientists and climate prediction, but feel good liberal socialist goobly gook bull ****. In other words it is not our side that's been making the stupid emotionally driven predictions based on the fantasy of co2 driving global some runaway warming as you people are claiming. Watch this real whopper of the hysterically funny video. Just look at this lineup of Washington politicians and policymakers USING the idea of ONE mild winter to state that that's proof of global warming: http://www.freedomslighthouse.com/20...-eloquent.html Just watch the above video, you'll laugh your pass off as to how stupid these policymakers are using their feelings to put legislation for global warming. You might not be so bad if you're talking about some blog or someone using the weather to push an opinion in a newsgroup, but when the policymakers in Washington to start doing exactly what you're complaining about, it's time for you to hold up a mirror. Talk about calling the kettle black. In other word your being a prick and an asshole to stand here and tell me that it's our side using the weather to make predictions of dire runaway catastrophic weather. The press the media, and yes even as the above quote shows scientist at the sea are you or pushing this bull **** based on a mild winter. In other words what you are doing here is what we call hypocrisy. I have to wonder what it is about you warmest that are in such love with cooking up the data, lying, suppressing opposing views, and simply as the above shows using ONE warm winter in Washington to push ahead large sweeping socialist policies and taxation on the unsuspecting public? The above quotes and video shows that your side wrote the book on using an mild winter to push this climate bull crap. So it's time for you to sit on the big black pot belly kettle, and look in a mirror. Super Turtle |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Earth's global average temp more or less steady since 2001 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
What weather do you see less of in your area these days? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
What weather do you see less of in your area these days? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
More Efficiency ,More Benefit, Less Risk, Less Work! | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Warming seas could mean less dissolved oxygen--and more dead fish. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |