On 2/15/2010 9:44 AM, Lames whined/opined:

"enigma" wrote in...
--
Considering the fact that you haven't shown us any proof
of a cooling climate in all the time you have been up here
through legitimate news sources only proves YOU are FRAUD.

A warming climate does not need IPCC charts to be proven.

Then PROVE the AGW warming

That's already been accomplished, and you're the one that
has yet to prove otherwise, despite your pathetic mewlings
to the contrary..

--As well as your evasions, insinuations and aspersions..

"Man_of_Mind" wrote in message

On 2/15/2010 9:44 AM, Lames whined/opined:

"enigma" wrote in...
Considering the fact that you haven't shown us any proof
of a cooling climate in all the time you have been up here
through legitimate news sources only proves YOU are FRAUD.

A warming climate does not need IPCC charts to be proven.

Then PROVE the AGW warming

That's already been accomplished, and you're the one that
has yet to prove otherwise, despite your pathetic mewlings
to the contrary..

--As well as your evasions, insinuations and aspersions..

Now THAT is evasive. Put up or shut up. The co2 argument that man is
responsible does not hold water.

James wrote:
"Man_of_Mind" wrote in message

On 2/15/2010 9:44 AM, Lames whined/opined:

"enigma" wrote in...
Considering the fact that you haven't shown us any proof
of a cooling climate in all the time you have been up here
through legitimate news sources only proves YOU are FRAUD.

A warming climate does not need IPCC charts to be proven.

Then PROVE the AGW warming

That's already been accomplished, and you're the one that
has yet to prove otherwise, despite your pathetic mewlings
to the contrary..

--As well as your evasions, insinuations and aspersions..

Now THAT is evasive. Put up or shut up. The co2 argument that man is
responsible does not hold water.



Well, being a denialist has the huge tactical advantage in arguments
that you don't have to prove that anything is true. In fact, you can
claim anything you like and voila, it's automatically beyond dispute!
It's a bit like having a cloak of invincibility and unlimited fire power
at the same time.
Hey, you don't play WoW by any chance?

On 2/15/2010 10:23 AM, Lames whined/opined:

Man_of_Mind was laughing at the pathetic primate posturings posted by:

On 2/15/2010 9:44 AM, Lames whined/opined:

"enigma" wrote in...

Considering the fact that you haven't shown us any proof
of a cooling climate in all the time you have been up here
through legitimate news sources only proves YOU are FRAUD.

A warming climate does not need IPCC charts to be proven.

Then PROVE the AGW warming

That's already been accomplished, and you're the one that
has yet to prove otherwise, despite your pathetic mewlings
to the contrary..

--As well as your evasions, insinuations and aspersions..

Now THAT is evasive

Yes, on your behalf.. I see that you haven't put together
a cogent set of testable conjectures that dispute the data
and hypothesis concerning the climate changes we're measuring..

Put up or shut up.

You first, you ambitiously ignorant right-wing punk..

The co2 argument that man is responsible does not hold water.

Prove it. Let's see you formulate a rigorous set of tests
for your unbiased conclusion regarding CO2 and how mankind
isn't emitting 28 billion tons of it into the lower atmosphere..

--Then show me how those hacked e-mails confirm such..

On Feb 16, 12:00*am, Man_of_Mind wrote:
On 2/15/2010 10:23 AM, Lames whined/opined:





Man_of_Mind was laughing at the pathetic primate posturings posted by:

On 2/15/2010 9:44 AM, Lames whined/opined:

"enigma" wrote in...

Considering the fact that you haven't shown us any proof
of a cooling climate in all the time you have been up here
through legitimate news sources only proves YOU are FRAUD.

A warming climate does not need IPCC charts to be proven.

Then PROVE the AGW warming

That's already been accomplished, and you're the one that
has yet to prove otherwise, despite your pathetic mewlings
to the contrary..

--As well as your evasions, insinuations and aspersions..

Now THAT is evasive

Yes, on your behalf.. *I see that you haven't put together
a cogent set of testable conjectures that dispute the data
and hypothesis concerning the climate changes we're measuring..

Put up or shut up.

You first, you ambitiously ignorant right-wing punk..

The co2 argument that man is responsible does not hold water.

Prove it. *Let's see you formulate a rigorous set of tests
for your unbiased conclusion regarding CO2 and how mankind
isn't emitting 28 billion tons of it into the lower atmosphere..

--Then show me how those hacked e-mails confirm such..

Right now, there seems to be no evidence of much global warming. The
temp record now shows nothing unusual at all. What little warming
there was until 1995, was well within natural variation.

On 2/15/2010 11:14 PM, Frogwatch wrote:

Man_of_Mind was excoriating the ambitious ignorance exhibited by:

On 2/15/2010 10:23 AM, Lames whined/opined:

Man_of_Mind was laughing at the pathetic primate posturings posted by:

On 2/15/2010 9:44 AM, Lames whined/opined:

"enigma" wrote in...

Considering the fact that you haven't shown us any proof
of a cooling climate in all the time you have been up here
through legitimate news sources only proves YOU are FRAUD.

A warming climate does not need IPCC charts to be proven.

Then PROVE the AGW warming

That's already been accomplished, and you're the one that
has yet to prove otherwise, despite your pathetic mewlings
to the contrary..

--As well as your evasions, insinuations and aspersions..

Now THAT is evasive

Yes, on your behalf.. I see that you haven't put together
a cogent set of testable conjectures that dispute the data
and hypothesis concerning the climate changes we're measuring..

Put up or shut up.

You first, you ambitiously ignorant right-wing punk..

The co2 argument that man is responsible does not hold water.

Prove it. Let's see you formulate a rigorous set of tests
for your unbiased conclusion regarding CO2 and how mankind
isn't emitting 28 billion tons of it into the lower atmosphere..

--Then show me how those hacked e-mails confirm such..

Right now, there seems to be no evidence of much global warming.

You are incorrect..

The temp record now shows nothing unusual at all.

You are incorrect, again..

What little warming there was until 1995

That is also false..

--Provably..