Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate
The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2 The global data given above are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The regression statistics for the line in the graph above are below. Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(|t|) (Intercept) -25.75364 2.06182 -12.5 2e-16 YEARMON 0.01295 0.00103 12.5 2.8e-30 Residual standard error: 0.18 on 372 degrees of freedom R-Squared: 0.30 F-statistic: 157 on 1 and 372 DF, p-value: 2.82e-30 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 16, 4:33*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. ø If there ever was an useless statistic ... and it does not show "A Warming Global Climate" or anything else. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 16, 4:33*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate The "science" of "making **** up". [hehe/flush] It's over, woger. You alarmists are the lunatic fringe... |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 16, 9:33*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2 The global data given above are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The regression statistics for the line in the graph above are below. Coefficients: * * * * * * *Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(|t|) (Intercept) -25.75364 * *2.06182 * -12.5 * 2e-16 YEARMON * * * 0.01295 * *0.00103 * *12.5 * 2.8e-30 Residual standard error: 0.18 on 372 degrees of freedom R-Squared: 0.30 F-statistic: *157 on 1 and 372 DF, *p-value: 2.82e-30 I get a better R-squared relating CO2 increase to Ocean temp. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 16, 4:23*pm, chemist wrote:
On Feb 16, 9:33*pm, Roger Coppock wrote: Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2 The global data given above are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The regression statistics for the line in the graph above are below. Coefficients: * * * * * * *Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(|t|) (Intercept) -25.75364 * *2.06182 * -12.5 * 2e-16 YEARMON * * * 0.01295 * *0.00103 * *12.5 * 2.8e-30 Residual standard error: 0.18 on 372 degrees of freedom R-Squared: 0.30 F-statistic: *157 on 1 and 372 DF, *p-value: 2.82e-30 I get a better R-squared relating CO2 increase to Ocean temp. Answer all the questions like a good scientist. Whose ocean temp? Whose CO2? What time period? What degrees of freedom? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate
The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2 The global data given above are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The regression statistics for the line in the graph above are below. Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(|t|) (Intercept) -25.75364 2.06182 -12.5 2e-16 YEARMON 0.01295 0.00103 12.5 2.8e-30 Residual standard error: 0.18 on 372 degrees of freedom R-Squared: 0.30 F-statistic: 157 on 1 and 372 DF, p-value: 2.82e-30 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 16, 8:23*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Feb 16, 4:23*pm, chemist wrote: On Feb 16, 9:33*pm, Roger Coppock wrote: Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2 The global data given above are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The regression statistics for the line in the graph above are below. Coefficients: * * * * * * *Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(|t|) (Intercept) -25.75364 * *2.06182 * -12.5 * 2e-16 YEARMON * * * 0.01295 * *0.00103 * *12.5 * 2.8e-30 Residual standard error: 0.18 on 372 degrees of freedom R-Squared: 0.30 F-statistic: *157 on 1 and 372 DF, *p-value: 2.82e-30 I get a better R-squared relating CO2 increase to Ocean temp. Answer all the questions like a good scientist. Whose ocean temp? Whose CO2? What time period? What degrees of freedom? ø ROTFLMAO Stupid is as stupid does Roger you are asking questions that are not relevant to anything about climate All of the tropical waters are going to get warmer over the next 20 to 60 years mostly from magma seeps under water. The warm water with CO2 encapsuled will rise via convection into the clouds and when the hot air from the tropics meets the cold air in the Arctic you get blizzards. With so much cloud cover the the sun does not get in to melt and so it piles up year by year. The increased weight of the ice and snow affects the tectonic plates and that squeezes more magma out in the tropics ... ø Face the facts:— sometime between 2030 and 2100 the ice will start inching its way toward the Equator. The next ice age has already begun. —*— | In real science the burden of proof is always | on the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far | neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one | iota of valid data for global warming nor have | they provided data that climate change is being | effected by commerce and industry, and not by | natural phenomena |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:25:29 -0800 (PST), Roger Coppock
wrote: Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2 The global data given above are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The regression statistics for the line in the graph above are below. Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(|t|) (Intercept) -25.75364 2.06182 -12.5 2e-16 YEARMON 0.01295 0.00103 12.5 2.8e-30 Residual standard error: 0.18 on 372 degrees of freedom R-Squared: 0.30 F-statistic: 157 on 1 and 372 DF, p-value: 2.82e-30 So satellites are needed to measure surface temperatures? Sounds like an expensive way to hide the decline. Where are the nines? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 17, 4:33*pm, "I M @ good guy" wrote:
* * * * *So satellites are needed to measure surface temperatures? * * * * *Sounds like an expensive way to hide the decline. * *Where are the nines? Well there are more chances to 'smooth' that incoming inconvenient data |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
... Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. A layer? If so, how thick and how high from the ground? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Don't Read Warning: More Say As I do and Not as I say CAGW Nonsense. | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Satellite Data Say, "Third warmest January!" | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Hadley Sea Surface Temperature Data Say, "July Was Second Warmest." | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
NASA data say, "In the Northern Hemisphere, March was 15thWarmest in 130 Years." Quite Unlikely!!! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
[WR] Third air frost of the month | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |