Please see:

http://data.gosat.nies.go.jp/GosatUs...igPage/open.do

No doubt about it, man made CO2 is heating the Earth.
These global infrared data very clearly show CO2 coming
from Human habitats and scattering heat.

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:54:13 -0800 (PST)
Roger Coppock wrote:

Please see:

http://data.gosat.nies.go.jp/GosatUs...igPage/open.do

No doubt about it, man made CO2 is heating the Earth.
These global infrared data very clearly show CO2 coming
from Human habitats and scattering heat.

Well now, that is not what I see in these images. These
are maps similar to the University of AIRS map of CO2
for December 2009 posted a while back. Here we have GOSAT
maps plotted by the Japanese. There are four maps: April,
July, and November 2009; and January 2010.

These maps contain only partial data. Vast areas of the earth
are not mapped at all, and they are left white. The north and
south polar regions are cut off, and the cut off varies from
month to month. There is often no data above 45 degrees North
or below 55 degrees south. This makes it difficult to compare
with my observation of elevated CO2 regions in the University
of Colorado plots that lay along the "ring of fire" extending
from Japan through the Aleutian Islands into Alaska. Also
missing is the region from Bulgaria through
Kazakhstan to Mongolia.

Coverage in the Southern Hemisphere is particularly
disappointing. Except for Australia there is nothing
but a few passes of the polar satellite that look like
NASA weekly data. Antarctica is completely unmeasured,
so the location of the CO2 hot spot near Dome Fuji is
never covered.

It is much easier to show high CO2 levels over western
countries when you do not plot data for the rest of
the world.

I do not think the plots shown in the gallery section are
intended to provide full coverage, but only to illustrate
what the satellite does.

compare

http://www.gosat.nies.go.jp/eng/gallery/
FTS_L2_SWIR_CO2_gallery.htm
(please cut and paste to fix line wrap)

http://airs.jpl.nasa.gov/AIRS_CO2_Data/

On Feb 18, 7:59*pm, Trawley Trash wrote:
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:54:13 -0800 (PST)

Roger Coppock wrote:
Please see:

http://data.gosat.nies.go.jp/GosatUs...guig/GuigPage/...

No doubt about it, man made CO2 is heating the Earth.
These global infrared data very clearly show CO2 coming
from Human habitats and scattering heat.

*Well now, that is not what I see in these images. *These
*are maps similar to the University of AIRS map of CO2
*for December 2009 posted a while back. *Here we have GOSAT
*maps plotted by the Japanese. * There are four maps: *April,
*July, and November 2009; and January 2010.

*These maps contain only partial data. *Vast areas of the earth
*are not mapped at all, and they are left white. *The north and
*south polar regions are cut off, and the cut off varies from
*month to month. *There is often no data above 45 degrees North
*or below 55 degrees south. *This makes it difficult to compare
*with my observation of elevated CO2 regions in the University
*of Colorado plots that lay along the "ring of fire" extending
*from Japan through the Aleutian Islands into Alaska. *Also
*missing is the region from Bulgaria through
*Kazakhstan to Mongolia. *

*Coverage in the Southern Hemisphere is particularly
*disappointing. *Except for Australia there is nothing
*but a few passes of the polar satellite that look like
*NASA weekly data. *Antarctica is completely unmeasured,
*so the location of the CO2 hot spot near Dome Fuji is
*never covered.

*It is much easier to show high CO2 levels over western
*countries when you do not plot data for the rest of
*the world.

*I do not think the plots shown in the gallery section are
*intended to provide full coverage, but only to illustrate
*what the satellite does.

*compare

*http://www.gosat.nies.go.jp/eng/gallery/
* *FTS_L2_SWIR_CO2_gallery.htm
*(please cut and paste to fix line wrap)

*http://airs.jpl.nasa.gov/AIRS_CO2_Data/

so i recently gave you a suggestion to aid you in your research, but
you did not respond in a positive manner. Once again, you can check
the so2 images, and correlate that to the co2 images, and you will
find your assertions dont hold water.

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:56:54 -0800 (PST)
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote:

so i recently gave you a suggestion to aid you in your research, but
you did not respond in a positive manner. Once again, you can check
the so2 images, and correlate that to the co2 images, and you will
find your assertions dont hold water.

The plots for CO2 show no data for the regions of interest.

On Feb 19, 4:43*am, Trawley Trash wrote:
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:56:54 -0800 (PST)
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote:

so i recently gave you a suggestion to aid you in your research, but
you did not respond in a positive manner. *Once again, you can check
the so2 images, and correlate that to the co2 images, and you will
find your assertions dont hold water.

*The plots for CO2 show no data for the regions of interest.

you can use the AIRS data (just like we discussed in the other thread)
and you will find your assertions dont hold water.