sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 20th 10, 05:38 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.geo.meteorology,sci.environment,sci.geo.oceanography
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2009
Posts: 205
Default Five Small Problems with AGW "science"

On 2/19/10 11:26 PM, Last Post wrote:
1- Gravity does not permit CO2 to rise above
the earth


We'd all be dead if you were right!

  #2   Report Post  
Old February 20th 10, 05:56 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.geo.meteorology,sci.environment,sci.geo.oceanography
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2009
Posts: 185
Default Five Small Problems with AGW "science"

On Feb 20, 12:38*am, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 2/19/10 11:26 PM, Last Post wrote:

* * 1- Gravity does not permit CO2 to rise above
* * the earth


ø Hey worm, are you saying that Newton was wrong?


We'd all be dead if you were right!


ø Not so you idiot. If you read the article you
would see where you are dead wrong. I
phrased it so that simpletons like you might
understand it. You can't tell science from
propaganda like on NPR

ø The issue is really irrelevant.
Nobody can control the wind
Nobody can control the rain or snow
Nobody (collectively) can control climate.
Global temps are within natural variations
Oceans heating are a prelude to glaciation
Get used to it!!

— —
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural phenomena
  #3   Report Post  
Old February 20th 10, 06:13 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.geo.meteorology,sci.environment,sci.geo.oceanography
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2009
Posts: 205
Default Five Small Problems with AGW "science"

On 2/19/10 11:56 PM, Last Post wrote:
ø Not so you idiot. If you read the article you
would see where you are dead wrong. I
phrased it so that simpletons like you might
understand it.


All you succeeded in was screwing it up.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Five Small Problems with AGW science. Sam Wormley[_2_] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 3 February 21st 10 03:32 PM
Five Small Problems with AGW science. Sam Wormley[_2_] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 February 20th 10 06:58 PM
Five Small Problems with AGW science. Last Post sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 1 February 20th 10 06:52 PM
Five Small Problems with AGW science. Last Post sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 February 20th 10 05:35 PM
Five Small Problems with AGW science. Androcles[_10_] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 February 20th 10 03:12 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017