Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 5:30*am, Dave Typinski wrote:
As such, I stand behind all efforts and expenses incurred with moving the global population inland and increasing energy efficiency. ø There is not reason to move population inland. The seas are not rising, and are not likely to rise at all for a hundred thousand years or more. ø The most efficient energy source is petroleum. That is crude oil, natural gas and coal. Those simply make good sense given the undisputed facts: ø Your "facts" are false — definitely "disputed" the Earth's climate is warming up ø You do not have any proof of that. and primary sources of energy are in ever shorter supply. ø The primary sources of energy, crude oil and natural gas supplies are infinite. *However, I firmly resist any notion that we should try to legislate a change in the environment. -- Dave Typinski |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Five Small Problems with AGW science. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Five Small Problems with AGW science. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Five Small Problems with AGW science. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Five Small Problems with AGW science. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Five Small Problems with AGW "science" | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |