On Feb 21, 12:10 pm, Tim Balls wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.g...ac509606e5786c


On Feb 21, 9:55 am, RayLopez99 wrote:

Climate science: Credibility at risk, scientists say
By Janet Raloff


Trust only Lord Moncton for your knowledge needs. Non scientists can
only be trusted these days.


Scientists are leftists and must be discredited at all costs.


Bush was right to censor science because it was undermining our
ideology.


So as normal, a BELIEVER in the psuedo religion must relegate
specifics into meaningless generalities in order to ignore the facts.

So tell your lies to Obama. He will surely appreciate this as he sits
in prison waiting to die of old age and face full reckoning for acting
on because of believing in your lies and false science.

If AGW was based on real science, instead of the fabricated distorted
and incomplete bull**** that it is, the 'scientists' would be more
than willing to provide a complete and accurate display of their basic
science, data and methodology.

It is becoming tiresome to listen to the rants of how important the
scaremongering is for saving the earth and humanity from impending
disaster, and then for the 'scientists' to be unwilling to show their
basic data and methodology. Their privacy concerns are more
important?

Only chronic liars and entirely inept idiots would accept the
unsupported conclusions and statements repeated and put forth by these
charlatans and allow the label of science on completely theoretical
and invalid surmise.

In real science, methodology must be outlined in order that others may
repeat the procedure and obtain empiral evidence for the conclusions
and establishment of facts. Modern climatology wishes to replace this
with the demand to accept their conclusions without scientific
methodology, and name calling and intimidation for those who do not
accept their unsupported statements and conclusions.

Any scientific organization which accepts AGW as science is subject to
complete loss of scientific accreditation.


KD

wrote

So as normal, a BELIEVER in the psuedo religion must relegate

Say Kent, the sex offenders of Oklahoma are having a convention and I see
by the published list that you are on it. Are you going?

Besides, you're no scientist. You're a convicted sex offender and a
laborer. A ****ing Hillbilly. Why bat above your league here when you
can join the perverts at the convention? There's a badge waiting for
you at the door!

See! Here's your name right here!

Oklahoma Sex and Violent Crime Offender Registry

1 - 3 of 3

ODOC# 231316 Kent Jay Deatherage 1009 Shamrock Road, Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma 73131 Oklahoma Verified (White Male

Wow! They even have 2 pretty pictures of you!

http://docapp8.doc.state.ok.us/servl...&_dad=portal30
&_schema=PORTAL30&offender_id=2848&first_name=k ent

Y'all like having sex with women against their will there Kent?

Or was it little boys?


Filthy criminal.