On Mar 10, 7:57*pm, Roving rabbit wrote:
B,O,N,Z,O wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
.. .
B,O,N,Z,O wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
.. .
O_N_Z_O_B wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
...
O_N_Z_O_B wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
. nl...
O_N_Z_O_B wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
l.nl...
And the real fun still has to start, because you haven't seen yet
the
total financial effort to get rid of excessive GHG emissions.
viz: A totally pointless waste of money!
One of the consequences of global warming is the occurrence of more
extreme events such as heat waves.
Forget something?

Disclaimer

* The projections are based on results from computer models that
involve
simplifications of real physical processes that are not fully
understood.
It is not a projection, it is a reconstruction. The summer heat wave
of
2003 was deadly for elderly.

Q
And what about the record-breaking cold winter the northern hemisphere
is
currently enduring?

Or the massive rainfalls and floods in SE Australia?

Both are the exact opposite of your " reconstruction".
Also this is what they call extreme weather events, they are partly
natural, but the point I'm trying to make is that their occurrence
increases as GW kicks in.

So the massive rainfalls and floods plus the cold winter are also linked
to this GW.

Queensland's biggest flood ever was in 1890.
Now tell me that that was due to global warming as well!
It is the rate of occurrence that matters.

ROTFLMAO
So far has not been repeated!

Keep on laughing, but you will get soaked by global warming.

For curiosity I checked our local data, beyond doubt the conclusion is
that rainfall has significantly increased over a century.

All months have become wetter, and if you read Dutch then you should try
to take a look at:

http://staff.science.uva.nl/~jboxel/...a/NLnatter.htm

Now, the question is what sort of economic damage you will get from a 10
to 20% increase in the rainfall, including a larger increase in a short
bursts of rainfall, because they cause the floods.


For most countries, increasing heat + rainfall + CO2 will increases
food production and not be economic damage at all.
Why don't you take your AGW alarmist blinkers off and THINK about it?

Flaps_50! wrote:
On Mar 10, 7:57 pm, Roving rabbit wrote:
B,O,N,Z,O wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
...
B,O,N,Z,O wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
...
O_N_Z_O_B wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
...
O_N_Z_O_B wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
...
O_N_Z_O_B wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
...
And the real fun still has to start, because you haven't seen yet
the
total financial effort to get rid of excessive GHG emissions.
viz: A totally pointless waste of money!
One of the consequences of global warming is the occurrence of more
extreme events such as heat waves.
Forget something?
Disclaimer
The projections are based on results from computer models that
involve
simplifications of real physical processes that are not fully
understood.
It is not a projection, it is a reconstruction. The summer heat wave
of
2003 was deadly for elderly.
Q
And what about the record-breaking cold winter the northern hemisphere
is
currently enduring?
Or the massive rainfalls and floods in SE Australia?
Both are the exact opposite of your " reconstruction".
Also this is what they call extreme weather events, they are partly
natural, but the point I'm trying to make is that their occurrence
increases as GW kicks in.
So the massive rainfalls and floods plus the cold winter are also linked
to this GW.
Queensland's biggest flood ever was in 1890.
Now tell me that that was due to global warming as well!
It is the rate of occurrence that matters.
ROTFLMAO
So far has not been repeated!
Keep on laughing, but you will get soaked by global warming.

For curiosity I checked our local data, beyond doubt the conclusion is
that rainfall has significantly increased over a century.

All months have become wetter, and if you read Dutch then you should try
to take a look at:

http://staff.science.uva.nl/~jboxel/...a/NLnatter.htm

Now, the question is what sort of economic damage you will get from a 10
to 20% increase in the rainfall, including a larger increase in a short
bursts of rainfall, because they cause the floods.


For most countries, increasing heat + rainfall + CO2 will increases
food production and not be economic damage at all.
Why don't you take your AGW alarmist blinkers off and THINK about it?


More rainfall was maybe not such a good sign for those affected in the
recent Australian flooding.

Q

--
Who is general failure and why does he need my attention?

On Mar 13, 4:44*pm, Roving rabbit wrote:
Flaps_50! wrote:
On Mar 10, 7:57 pm, Roving rabbit wrote:
B,O,N,Z,O wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
.. .
B,O,N,Z,O wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
...
O_N_Z_O_B wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
. nl...
O_N_Z_O_B wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
l.nl...
O_N_Z_O_B wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
all.nl...
And the real fun still has to start, because you haven't seen yet
the
total financial effort to get rid of excessive GHG emissions..
viz: A totally pointless waste of money!
One of the consequences of global warming is the occurrence of more
extreme events such as heat waves.
Forget something?
Disclaimer
* The projections are based on results from computer models that
involve
simplifications of real physical processes that are not fully
understood.
It is not a projection, it is a reconstruction. The summer heat wave
of
2003 was deadly for elderly.
Q
And what about the record-breaking cold winter the northern hemisphere
is
currently enduring?
Or the massive rainfalls and floods in SE Australia?
Both are the exact opposite of your " reconstruction".
Also this is what they call extreme weather events, they are partly
natural, but the point I'm trying to make is that their occurrence
increases as GW kicks in.
So the massive rainfalls and floods plus the cold winter are also linked
to this GW.
Queensland's biggest flood ever was in 1890.
Now tell me that that was due to global warming as well!
It is the rate of occurrence that matters.
ROTFLMAO
So far has not been repeated!
Keep on laughing, but you will get soaked by global warming.

For curiosity I checked our local data, beyond doubt the conclusion is
that rainfall has significantly increased over a century.

All months have become wetter, and if you read Dutch then you should try
to take a look at:

http://staff.science.uva.nl/~jboxel/...a/NLnatter.htm

Now, the question is what sort of economic damage you will get from a 10
to 20% increase in the rainfall, including a larger increase in a short
bursts of rainfall, because they cause the floods.

For most countries, increasing heat + rainfall + CO2 will increases
food production and not be economic damage at all.
Why don't you take your AGW alarmist blinkers off and THINK about it?

More rainfall was maybe not such a good sign for those affected in the
recent Australian flooding.


Short term pain only.
Cheer

Flaps_50! wrote:
On Mar 13, 4:44 pm, Roving rabbit wrote:
Flaps_50! wrote:
On Mar 10, 7:57 pm, Roving rabbit wrote:
B,O,N,Z,O wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
...
B,O,N,Z,O wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
...
O_N_Z_O_B wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
...
O_N_Z_O_B wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
...
O_N_Z_O_B wrote:
"Roving rabbit" wrote in message
...
And the real fun still has to start, because you haven't seen yet
the
total financial effort to get rid of excessive GHG emissions..
viz: A totally pointless waste of money!
One of the consequences of global warming is the occurrence of more
extreme events such as heat waves.
Forget something?
Disclaimer
The projections are based on results from computer models that
involve
simplifications of real physical processes that are not fully
understood.
It is not a projection, it is a reconstruction. The summer heat wave
of
2003 was deadly for elderly.
Q
And what about the record-breaking cold winter the northern hemisphere
is
currently enduring?
Or the massive rainfalls and floods in SE Australia?
Both are the exact opposite of your " reconstruction".
Also this is what they call extreme weather events, they are partly
natural, but the point I'm trying to make is that their occurrence
increases as GW kicks in.
So the massive rainfalls and floods plus the cold winter are also linked
to this GW.
Queensland's biggest flood ever was in 1890.
Now tell me that that was due to global warming as well!
It is the rate of occurrence that matters.
ROTFLMAO
So far has not been repeated!
Keep on laughing, but you will get soaked by global warming.
For curiosity I checked our local data, beyond doubt the conclusion is
that rainfall has significantly increased over a century.
All months have become wetter, and if you read Dutch then you should try
to take a look at:
http://staff.science.uva.nl/~jboxel/...a/NLnatter.htm
Now, the question is what sort of economic damage you will get from a 10
to 20% increase in the rainfall, including a larger increase in a short
bursts of rainfall, because they cause the floods.
For most countries, increasing heat + rainfall + CO2 will increases
food production and not be economic damage at all.
Why don't you take your AGW alarmist blinkers off and THINK about it?
More rainfall was maybe not such a good sign for those affected in the
recent Australian flooding.


Short term pain only.
Cheer

Be honest now, how many deaths are there is Australia due to this
flooding, and how large is the economic damage?

--
Who is general failure and why does he need my attention?