wrote in message
...
On Mar 12, 12:22 am, "klunk" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Electric utilities are constructing expensive and
inefficient solar plants because of subsidies and
mandates from federal and state governments.

Expensive Solar Power Continues to Be Built in the U.S.: Why?

because it's a relatively new source of power which has made incredible
strides in the last decade alone and within a short period of time as
production continues to ramp up while it becomes even more efficient,
will
eventually become a literally free, renewable and environmentally
friendly
source of power that will revolutionize the entire world....

ø Klunkhead is an idiot without a clue.

ø 1- Many active solar, wind and thermal
projects are crumbling already

cite...?...


2- All wind and solar plants are a- very
expensive to build, b- worse to operate,
c- grossly inefficient, d- electricity bills will
skyrocket.

cite...?...


3- All of those construction subsidies are
coming right out of the taxpayers pockets.

so...?... so do subsidies to the oil and gas industry...


ø There will not be even one solar generating
station in operation 10 years after it goes online.

cite...?...


ø Crude oil and natural gas are cheap and efficient
fuels and are infinitely available. So is coal

nope... they are neither cheap nor efficient nor infinite... they are only
prevalent and mature... and well on their way to hitting their expiration
date... and considering their and coal's environmental damage, along with
their political and economic implications, they're looking less attractive
by the day....


ø The issue is really irrelevant.
Nobody can control the wind
Nobody can control the rain or snow
Nobody (collectively) can control climate.
Global temps are within natural variations
Oceans heating are a prelude to glaciation

? Get used to it!!

oh... we ARE used to your brainless stupidity... even more so because you
function as a useful idiot for destructive dinosaurs of industry without any
compensation for your idiot loyalty....


- -
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the skeptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural causes

prove this true or prove yourself an idiot... it's your choice... ;-)