On Mar 26, 10:41Â*pm, TUKA wrote:


As usual, a red herring from the AGW crowd. If your issue is plant
growth change or even ocean acidification, take it there. This
is a thread about

Â* Â* Â* Â* Catastrophic.
Â* Â* Â* Â* Anthropogenic.
Â* Â* Â* Â* Global.
Â* Â* Â* Â* Warming.

Admit that CO2 doesn't do that, then take your arguments somewhere
else when you find someone who cares.

ø TUKA– I just digested the paper cited above
and the conclusion that they do not have a clue
permeates the air.

1- The available data sucks wind
2- Whatever they do is based on "doubled CO2
caused by human sources".

ø The issue is really irrelevant.
Nobody can control the wind
Nobody can control the rain or snow
Nobody (collectively) can control climate.
Global temps are within natural variations
Oceans heating are a prelude to glaciation


 Get used to it!!

— —
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the skeptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural causes