On Mar 30, 10:30Â*am, Claudius Denk wrote:
On Mar 30, 6:55Â*am, Ognjen wrote:

On Mar 29, 3:57Â*am, Claudius Denk wrote:


I'm not going to assume responsibility for explaining your delusions.

Yet you demand that others explain your delusions without you doing
any actual work?

In science the burden of proof is on the shoulders of those making
extraordinary claims.

You can **** and moan all you want, you're not going to change this
fact. Â*AGW is supposed to be a scientific concept. Â*The fact that none
of its proponents treat it as so doesn't mean that we are obligated to
pretend we don't notice.

ø The issue is really irrelevant.
Nobody can control the wind
Nobody can control the rain or snow
Nobody (collectively) can control climate.
Global temps are within natural variations
Oceans heating are a prelude to glaciation.


 Get used to it!!

— —
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the skeptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural causes

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:57:30 -0700 (PDT), Last Post
wrote in talk.origins:

On Mar 30, 10:30*am, Claudius Denk wrote:
On Mar 30, 6:55*am, Ognjen wrote:

On Mar 29, 3:57*am, Claudius Denk wrote:


I'm not going to assume responsibility for explaining your delusions.

Yet you demand that others explain your delusions without you doing
any actual work?

In science the burden of proof is on the shoulders of those making
extraordinary claims.

You can **** and moan all you want, you're not going to change this
fact. *AGW is supposed to be a scientific concept. *The fact that none
of its proponents treat it as so doesn't mean that we are obligated to
pretend we don't notice.

ø The issue is really irrelevant.
Nobody can control the wind
Nobody can control the rain or snow
Nobody (collectively) can control climate.
Global temps are within natural variations
Oceans heating are a prelude to glaciation.

? Get used to it!!

No.

You got it wrong.

— —
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the skeptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural causes