sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 31st 10, 04:09 PM posted to talk.origins,sci.geo.meteorology,sci.environment
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2008
Posts: 178
Default It is sublime

On Mar 31, 10:26*am, John Stockwell wrote:
On Mar 30, 12:24*am, Bill Ward wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:09:59 -0700, Kleuskes & Moos wrote:


I'm not sure if you would recognize an "argument from ignorance" if it
sat on your lap and smacked you in the face.


They don't need to. *They just need to contain the words,"The time
resolution of thePETMis not sufficiently fine to resolve an 800 lead or
lag, but there does not seem to be any other likely cause for thePETM".


ø Bill: How about nature?

Actually, no. The only plausible cause for the PETM is the CO2
increase.


ø NONSENSE

The
volcanic eruptions are known from the geologic record. The cessation
of the
volcanism is concurrent with the return of CO2 levels to normal, and
the temperature
also.
In the examples were CO2 is shown to lag warming, the warming is
concurrent
with trends that are are consistent with the Milankovich cycles. So,
in those cases,
as well, CO2 is reinforcing the warming effect that starts with
increased insolation
of the northern hemisphere.


ø More irrelevant nonsense.

ø Here is a brief quiz:

1- Can you control the wind in any way? Yes - No

2- Can you control the rain or the snow? Yes - No

3- Can you control the climate in any way? Yes = No

Those who say yes to one or more must describe how.
Those who fail to answer should stay out of these groups.

— —
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the skeptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural causes




  #2   Report Post  
Old April 1st 10, 05:00 PM posted to talk.origins, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.environment
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
Default It is sublime



" wrote in message
:

On Mar 31, 10:26*am, John Stockwell wrote:
On Mar 30, 12:24*am, Bill Ward wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:09:59 -0700, Kleuskes & Moos wrote:


I'm not sure if you would recognize an "argument from ignorance" if it
sat on your lap and smacked you in the face.


They don't need to. *They just need to contain the words,"The time
resolution of thePETMis not sufficiently fine to resolve an 800 lead or
lag, but there does not seem to be any other likely cause for thePETM".


ø Bill: How about nature?

Actually, no. The only plausible cause for the PETM is the CO2
increase.


ø NONSENSE

The
volcanic eruptions are known from the geologic record. The cessation
of the
volcanism is concurrent with the return of CO2 levels to normal, and
the temperature
also.
In the examples were CO2 is shown to lag warming, the warming is
concurrent
with trends that are are consistent with the Milankovich cycles. So,
in those cases,
as well, CO2 is reinforcing the warming effect that starts with
increased insolation
of the northern hemisphere.


ø More irrelevant nonsense.

ø Here is a brief quiz:

1- Can you control the wind in any way? Yes - No


Wind is weather, not climate.



2- Can you control the rain or the snow? Yes - No


Rainstorms and snowstorms are weather, not climate.


3- Can you control the climate in any way? Yes = No


Nuclear winter.
Anthropogenic global warming.



-- Steven L.



  #3   Report Post  
Old April 1st 10, 10:53 PM posted to talk.origins,sci.geo.meteorology,sci.environment
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 735
Default It is sublime

In article ,
says...

3- Can you control the climate in any way? Yes = No


Nuclear winter.
Anthropogenic global warming.


That's not control, that's affect, but don't worry, leo can't tell the
difference.

--
Alan LeHun

  #4   Report Post  
Old April 4th 10, 12:56 AM posted to talk.origins, sci.geo.meteorology, sci.environment
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
Default It is sublime



"Alan LeHun" wrote in message
:

In article ,
says...

3- Can you control the climate in any way? Yes = No


Nuclear winter.
Anthropogenic global warming.


That's not control, that's affect, but don't worry, leo can't tell the
difference.


Those two effects would balance each other out, enabling good control.



-- Steven L.



  #5   Report Post  
Old April 5th 10, 09:45 AM posted to talk.origins,sci.geo.meteorology,sci.environment
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Apr 2010
Posts: 1
Default It is sublime

In message , Steven L.
writes


"Alan LeHun" wrote in message
:

In article ,
says...

3- Can you control the climate in any way? Yes = No

Nuclear winter.
Anthropogenic global warming.


That's not control, that's affect, but don't worry, leo can't tell the
difference.


Those two effects would balance each other out, enabling good control.

We've already explained to you, several times, why your fantasy of
suppressing climate change by albedo modification by nuclear explosions
doesn't work.
--
alias Ernest Major



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
It is sublime Last Post sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 March 30th 10 11:59 PM
It is sublime??? Last Post sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 1 March 30th 10 11:41 PM
It is sublime??? [email protected] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 3 March 28th 10 04:50 PM
It is sublime??? [email protected] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 March 27th 10 02:04 AM
From the almost sublime to the almost ridiculous Trevor Harley uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 July 18th 07 06:34 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017