sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 5th 10, 06:11 AM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,uk.sci.weather,alt.global-warming,sci.environment
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2008
Posts: 7
Default More on why the cosmic ray/cloud cover connection is more important than greenhouse gases

On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:22:28 -0700 (PDT), in uk.sci.weather, Meteorologist
wrote:

On Apr 4, 1:03*am, richp wrote:
...
The world is so large that any idiot can find at least 4 crackpots
for any bunk.


Do you know any climate science?

David Christainsen


I realise that this will lead to your making more personal attacks on me,
but you have claimed elsewhere in the last few days to be a practicing
meteorologist.
You may have audited a course on meteorology decades ago at MIT, you may
have been a systems integrator, you may know lots about statistics, but
you have never shown any evidence that you have ever passed even one
course on meteorology. It's obviously a hobby of yours but some people
might think from your statements and username that you are more than a
hobbyist but are actually working as a meteorologist.

Doug Weller
--
Doug Weller --
A Director and Moderator of The Hall of Ma'at http://www.hallofmaat.com
Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk
Amun - co-owner/co-moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Amun/


  #2   Report Post  
Old April 5th 10, 06:26 AM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,uk.sci.weather,alt.global-warming,sci.environment
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2010
Posts: 9
Default More on why the cosmic ray/cloud cover connection is more importantthan greenhouse gases

On 4/5/2010 12:11 AM, Doug Weller wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:22:28 -0700 (PDT), in uk.sci.weather, Meteorologist
wrote:

On Apr 4, 1:03 am, wrote:
...
The world is so large that any idiot can find at least 4 crackpots
for any bunk.


Do you know any climate science?

David Christainsen


I realise that this will lead to your making more personal attacks on me,
but you have claimed elsewhere in the last few days to be a practicing
meteorologist.
You may have audited a course on meteorology decades ago at MIT, you may
have been a systems integrator, you may know lots about statistics, but
you have never shown any evidence that you have ever passed even one
course on meteorology. It's obviously a hobby of yours but some people
might think from your statements and username that you are more than a
hobbyist but are actually working as a meteorologist.

Doug Weller


Don't take him seriously. The guy is some kind of damaged nutjob, has
spammed many newsgroups. He's not a "practicing" anything. His only
objective is to elicit your response. Therefore affirms his existence.

Don't feed the troll.

  #3   Report Post  
Old April 5th 10, 02:16 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,uk.sci.weather,alt.global-warming,sci.environment
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2010
Posts: 81
Default More on why the cosmic ray/cloud cover connection is moreimportant than greenhouse gases

On Apr 5, 1:11*am, Doug Weller
wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:22:28 -0700 (PDT), in uk.sci.weather, Meteorologist
wrote:

On Apr 4, 1:03*am, richp wrote:
...
The world is so large that any idiot can find at least 4 crackpots
for any bunk.


Do you know any climate science?


David Christainsen


I realise that this will lead to your making more personal attacks on me,


You realize no such thing.

but you have claimed elsewhere in the last few days to be a practicing
meteorologist.


I was not claiming; I was stating a fact. Further,
I am currently writing some sections on climate
science etc. for a book on natural and sane theology
for the modern world with an ordained Christian
minister, who lives in Cambridge, Mass. USA.

Like me, this Christian minister has extensive
training in psychology etc...

You may have audited a course on meteorology decades ago at MIT, you may
have been a systems integrator, you may know lots about statistics, but
you have never shown any evidence that you have ever passed even one
course on meteorology.


For the usenet in the semi-distant past, I
deliberately withheld "any evidence" that
I "ever passed even one course on meteorology",

JUST BECAUSE OF DOUG WELLER. LOL

It's obviously a hobby of yours


Purest bunk here from Doug Weller. So, my over-all
topic of cosmic rays and climate, is no place for
amateurs like Doug Weller. This is not an attack
on Doug Weller!

but some people
might think from your statements and username that you are more than a
hobbyist but are actually working as a meteorologist.

Doug Weller
...


So, currently, I am actually working as a meteorologist...

David Christainsen
  #4   Report Post  
Old April 5th 10, 03:08 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,uk.sci.weather,alt.global-warming,sci.environment
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2008
Posts: 7
Default More on why the cosmic ray/cloud cover connection is more important than greenhouse gases

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:26:54 -0500, in uk.sci.weather, Unum wrote:

On 4/5/2010 12:11 AM, Doug Weller wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:22:28 -0700 (PDT), in uk.sci.weather, Meteorologist
wrote:

On Apr 4, 1:03 am, wrote:
...
The world is so large that any idiot can find at least 4 crackpots
for any bunk.

Do you know any climate science?

David Christainsen


I realise that this will lead to your making more personal attacks on me,
but you have claimed elsewhere in the last few days to be a practicing
meteorologist.
You may have audited a course on meteorology decades ago at MIT, you may
have been a systems integrator, you may know lots about statistics, but
you have never shown any evidence that you have ever passed even one
course on meteorology. It's obviously a hobby of yours but some people
might think from your statements and username that you are more than a
hobbyist but are actually working as a meteorologist.

Doug Weller


Don't take him seriously. The guy is some kind of damaged nutjob, has
spammed many newsgroups. He's not a "practicing" anything. His only
objective is to elicit your response. Therefore affirms his existence.

Don't feed the troll.


You're probably right, in fact I rarely get involved with any thread he's
in. Most of the editors who I've seen respond to him over the last few
years in quite a few newsgroups have said more or less the same thing
about him as you've said above.

Doug
--
Doug Weller --
A Director and Moderator of The Hall of Ma'at http://www.hallofmaat.com
Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk
Amun - co-owner/co-moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Amun/

  #5   Report Post  
Old April 5th 10, 10:11 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,uk.sci.weather,alt.global-warming,sci.environment
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: May 2009
Posts: 243
Default More on why the cosmic ray/cloud cover connection is more importantthan greenhouse gases

On 4/5/2010 8:16 AM, Meteorologist wrote:
On Apr 5, 1:11 am, Doug
wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:22:28 -0700 (PDT), in uk.sci.weather, Meteorologist
wrote:

On Apr 4, 1:03 am, wrote:
...
The world is so large that any idiot can find at least 4 crackpots
for any bunk.


Do you know any climate science?


David Christainsen


I realise that this will lead to your making more personal attacks on me,


You realize no such thing.

but you have claimed elsewhere in the last few days to be a practicing
meteorologist.


I was not claiming; I was stating a fact.


Prove it.

(Davey runs away)


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Preliminary results for the CERN CLOUD cosmic ray experiment Meteorologist[_2_] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 December 16th 10 06:35 PM
More on why the cosmic ray/cloud cover connection is more important than greenhouse gases Doug Weller[_2_] uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 4 April 5th 10 10:11 PM
Suggestion - future climate research involving cosmic ray cloud coverconnection Meteorologist[_2_] uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 March 21st 10 11:49 PM
ANOTHER NAIL IN THE COSMIC RAY COFFIN! Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 23 February 20th 07 12:50 PM
Cosmic ray flux and climate Waghorn uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 4 August 20th 03 07:26 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017