On Apr 22, 5:30*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
Climate Change and Anthropogenic Greenhouse Warming: A Selection of
Key Articles, 1824-1995, with Interpretive Essays

by Dr. James R. Fleming.
Introduction

Anyone seeking to understand climate change and anthropogenic
greenhouse warming is well advised to read not only the current
literature, but also the key scientific papers of earlier eras.

No duh.

History is particularly relevant since, over timescales of decades and
centuries, ideas about the climate have been changing faster than the
physical climate system. Thus, students of climate dynamics should
also be well read in science dynamics—the change of scientific ideas
and practices over time.

Please see:

http://wiki.nsdl.org/index.php/PALE:.../GlobalWarming

So, Roger, you're trying to impress us that you can read?

Claudius Denk wrote:
On Apr 22, 5:30 pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
Climate Change and Anthropogenic Greenhouse Warming: A Selection of
Key Articles, 1824-1995, with Interpretive Essays

by Dr. James R. Fleming.
Introduction

Anyone seeking to understand climate change and anthropogenic
greenhouse warming is well advised to read not only the current
literature, but also the key scientific papers of earlier eras.

No duh.

History is particularly relevant since, over timescales of decades and
centuries, ideas about the climate have been changing faster than the
physical climate system. Thus, students of climate dynamics should
also be well read in science dynamics—the change of scientific ideas
and practices over time.

Please see:

http://wiki.nsdl.org/index.php/PALE:.../GlobalWarming

So, Roger, you're trying to impress us that you can read?

And you are trying to impress us with the fact that you can neither read
nor understand?

Tom P wrote in
:

Claudius Denk wrote:
On Apr 22, 5:30 pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
Climate Change and Anthropogenic Greenhouse Warming: A Selection
of Key Articles, 1824-1995, with Interpretive Essays

by Dr. James R. Fleming.
Introduction

Anyone seeking to understand climate change and anthropogenic
greenhouse warming is well advised to read not only the current
literature, but also the key scientific papers of earlier eras.

No duh.

History is particularly relevant since, over timescales of decades
and centuries, ideas about the climate have been changing faster
than the physical climate system. Thus, students of climate
dynamics should also be well read in science dynamics—the change
of scientific ideas and practices over time.

Please see:

http://wiki.nsdl.org/index.php/PALE:.../GlobalWarming

So, Roger, you're trying to impress us that you can read?

And you are trying to impress us with the fact that you can neither
read nor understand?


he's doing a good job so far...



--

XO

On Apr 23, 3:22*am, Claudius Denk wrote:
On Apr 22, 5:30*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:

Climate Change and Anthropogenic Greenhouse Warming: A Selection of
Key Articles, 1824-1995, with Interpretive Essays

by Dr. James R. Fleming.
Introduction

Anyone seeking to understand climate change and anthropogenic
greenhouse warming is well advised to read not only the current
literature, but also the key scientific papers of earlier eras.

No duh.

History is particularly relevant since, over timescales of decades and
centuries, ideas about the climate have been changing faster than the
physical climate system. Thus, students of climate dynamics should
also be well read in science dynamics—the change of scientific ideas
and practices over time.

Please see:

http://wiki.nsdl.org/index.php/PALE:.../GlobalWarming

So, Roger, you're trying to impress us that you can read?

No, he's saying read them, and you will learn. Really, it is possible.

On Apr 23, 4:32*am, Dawlish wrote:
On Apr 23, 3:22*am, Claudius Denk wrote:





On Apr 22, 5:30*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:

Climate Change and Anthropogenic Greenhouse Warming: A Selection of
Key Articles, 1824-1995, with Interpretive Essays

by Dr. James R. Fleming.
Introduction

Anyone seeking to understand climate change and anthropogenic
greenhouse warming is well advised to read not only the current
literature, but also the key scientific papers of earlier eras.

No duh.

History is particularly relevant since, over timescales of decades and
centuries, ideas about the climate have been changing faster than the
physical climate system. Thus, students of climate dynamics should
also be well read in science dynamics—the change of scientific ideas
and practices over time.

Please see:

http://wiki.nsdl.org/index.php/PALE:.../GlobalWarming

So, Roger, you're trying to impress us that you can read?

No, he's saying read them, and you will learn. Really, it is possible.- Hide quoted text -

Reading without critical thinking will only leave you confused.

On Apr 23, 2:25*pm, Claudius Denk wrote:
On Apr 23, 4:32*am, Dawlish wrote:





On Apr 23, 3:22*am, Claudius Denk wrote:

On Apr 22, 5:30*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:

Climate Change and Anthropogenic Greenhouse Warming: A Selection of
Key Articles, 1824-1995, with Interpretive Essays

by Dr. James R. Fleming.
Introduction

Anyone seeking to understand climate change and anthropogenic
greenhouse warming is well advised to read not only the current
literature, but also the key scientific papers of earlier eras.

No duh.

History is particularly relevant since, over timescales of decades and
centuries, ideas about the climate have been changing faster than the
physical climate system. Thus, students of climate dynamics should
also be well read in science dynamics—the change of scientific ideas
and practices over time.

Please see:

http://wiki.nsdl.org/index.php/PALE:.../GlobalWarming

So, Roger, you're trying to impress us that you can read?

No, he's saying read them, and you will learn. Really, it is possible.- Hide quoted text -

Reading without critical thinking will only leave you confused.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I see. I must remember to read with a crical eye then.

Try reading this with a critical eye and tell me what you think.......

http://www.drroyspencer.com/Lindzen-...i-GRL-2009.pdf

and this:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/

On Apr 23, 6:35*am, Dawlish wrote:
On Apr 23, 2:25*pm, Claudius Denk wrote:





On Apr 23, 4:32*am, Dawlish wrote:

On Apr 23, 3:22*am, Claudius Denk wrote:

On Apr 22, 5:30*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:

Climate Change and Anthropogenic Greenhouse Warming: A Selection of
Key Articles, 1824-1995, with Interpretive Essays

by Dr. James R. Fleming.
Introduction

Anyone seeking to understand climate change and anthropogenic
greenhouse warming is well advised to read not only the current
literature, but also the key scientific papers of earlier eras.

No duh.

History is particularly relevant since, over timescales of decades and
centuries, ideas about the climate have been changing faster than the
physical climate system. Thus, students of climate dynamics should
also be well read in science dynamics—the change of scientific ideas
and practices over time.

Please see:

http://wiki.nsdl.org/index.php/PALE:.../GlobalWarming

So, Roger, you're trying to impress us that you can read?

No, he's saying read them, and you will learn. Really, it is possible..- Hide quoted text -

Reading without critical thinking will only leave you confused.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I see. I must remember to read with a crical eye then.

Try reading this with a critical eye and tell me what you think.......

http://www.drroyspencer.com/Lindzen-...i-GRL-2009.pdf

and this:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/

Okay, I think you have no dispute with any of this. Am I right?
(C,mon, be honest.)